HOW WILL MACRON FALL? WILL MERKEL BE INVOLVED?
Macron is no friend of the U.S., but we should protect him from the worst possibility. Posted on 12/9/2018.
On the evening of December 6, 2018 there was a broadcast of a radio show entitled Night Shadows with Stewart Best and Larry Taylor. While I have often been a guest on their show before, I wasn't on the program this time, but it opened with a long discussion (starting at one minute into the show) about my Torah Codes research. Larry correctly summed up much of what I had found at his request about French President Emmanuel Macron, but Stewart, who had not spoken to me before about the matrix presented below as Figure 1, kind of went astray at 6:30 where I noted that the matrix raised questions about Macron's wife (Macron is 40, his wife is 65). So this article will set the record straight about that and related problems that threaten to bring Macron down from power. A major correction up front is that the axis term which was presented as MARCON TO DIE, PRESIDENT could also be translated as MACRON TO BE DISABLED, PRESIDENT. The term was first found by Fabrice Bect in France. While everyone will eventually die, Macron has not yet done so, but the riots in France have forced Macron to pull back on new gas taxes and they threaten to bring down his presidency. In fact, they have already disabled much of his program, so the second translation for now appears to be better than the first.
STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF FIGURE 1. As per my standard protocol, no statistical significance is assigned to the axis term, which is MARCON TO DIE, PRESIDENT or MACRON TO BE DISABLED, PRESIDENT at its only ELS in wrapped Torah. The analysis here will be in two parts. First we will look at only two terms in 84 letters (6 columns by 14 rows) with the axis term: MERKEL and ARAB. Two spellings were used for MERKEL and one of them was found at skip +1 against odds of about 191 to 1. ARAB was at a non-special case skip in this box against odds of about 65 to 1. Odds against both being in the box were about 12,503 to 1.
The second way of analyzing the terms found is by looking at the full 1,218-letter matrix. The main a priori term of interest here is EXECUTIONER which is at the absolute skip of the axis term. Once I saw this word I began to worry that there was a need to transmit what I found to my Intel friends that was greater than my normal protocol of not publishing matrices that appeared to predict the death of allies. The last thing that I want to do is encourage some nut who wants to full prophecy, however in this case it's possible that the axis term only predicts the disabling of the Macron Government which, as of December 8, 2018, appears to be somewhat underway. EXECUTIONER is not very close to the axis term, but odds against it being at a special case skip (+/- 1 or the absolute skip of the axis term) on the full matrix were about 125 to 1. Seeing this word caused me to look for names on the matrix, or speculate about who such an executioner might be. I first looked for ARAB, which as I mentioned above was at a non-special case skip in this box against odds of about 65 to 1 on the small matrix. However in the full matrix ARAB had a 99.95% chance to be there - which means it isn't significant. Yes, SHOOTER is at the same absolute skip as ARAB however it had was what essentially a 100% chance to be on a matrix that size which means that (1) it is also not significant and (2) the correct interpretation of the axis term may be MACRON TO BE DISABLED, PRESIDENT. That seems to be the goal of Frenchmen who rioted against him on 12/8/2018. It seems like President Trump backed their opposition to Macron. He Tweeted:
The Paris Agreement isn’t working out so well for Paris. Protests and riots all over France. People do not want to pay large sums of money, much to third world countries (that are questionably run), in order to maybe protect the environment. Chanting “We Want Trump!” Love France.
I looked for names in the open text just to see if there was anyone that might be an executioner. The name SARAH was there but it had a 65.7% chance to be at skip +1. I sought Muhammad, but he wasn't there, so with ARAB in mind I sought ISHMAEL and found him at skip +1 against odds of about 25.5 to 1. There was no Islam, Obama, and no Trump, so I sought MERKEL. As I noted above I found her in the small 84-letter box against odds of about 191 to 1, but these odds shrink to only 13.67 on the full matrix.
With respect to cause of the current unrest, EURO shares at letter yud with SHOOTER, but it had a 100% to be there. ECONOMY at skip -6 touches the axis term but it had a 28.2% chance to be on the full matrix.
The major a posteriori find is Genesis 3:15 had only 1 chance in 250 to be on the matrix (as an a priori term, which it wasn't). It states:
And I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your offspring and hers.
This raised a question about Macron's wife. When Macron was only 15 years old he began an affair with his married teacher who was almost 40. Now that he is 40, married to her, and she is 65 he might feel that he has license to have an affair and she might get jealous. There are such rumors on the web, However, if any of them are true, particularly the more nasty ones, she may be a threat that French Intel folks might want to follow. One of her middle names, MARIE, shares a letter yud with the axis term, but I couldn't find her first name. MARIE wasn't significant. She had a 100% chance to be on the matrix. However, Genesis 3:15 also could have meaning with respect to MERKEL. There are press reports that indicate that the relationship between her and Macron has soured. The Economist notes that:
Flashes of irritation now mark the relationship between the two leaders, particularly over euro-zone reform. Allies of both Mr. Macron and Mrs. Merkel let it be known that their bosses are bridling at each other. The former considers the latter plodding and overcautious, the latter regards the former as rash and unreasonable.
At heart are two different understandings of the Merkron project. Mr. Macron believes in the need for big-bang reform of the EU, with an overhaul of the currency union at its core... he called for a euro-zone finance minister, a large common budget, and later for full banking union and a European Monetary Fund (EMF). The French president assumed that competitiveness-boosting reforms in France would increase Paris’s negotiating power.
By contrast Mrs. Merkel gives priority to an array of less-contentious subjects, including better border controls, greater co-ordination of defense and more co-operation on education and research. For the chancellor, Mr. Macron’s calls for euro-zone reform command no particular urgency. Berlin is willing to contemplate change to the currency union only on the condition that risk reduction (getting dodgy debts off balance-sheets) comes before any additional solidarity (mutualisation of risk). Mrs. Merkel is loth to test the patience of the Bundestag, where her “grand coalition” has only a modest majority.
It isn't clear that Merkel's concerns are great enough for her to put out an assassination order against Macron, but her name sits between the woman of Genesis 3:15 and the axis term. So what I'm asking my DoD Intel buddies to do is to be discreetly alert for any hints of such a threat. While, from what I have read about Macron and Merkel, I don't like either of them (see my recent article about Merkel) we don't need rash actions leading to another war between Germany and France (in which Russia might be the victor - although neither Russia nor Putin is on the matrix). If the worst interpretation of the axis term turns out to be true, and it appears that an Arab carried it out, then care should be taken to ensure that the possibility of an order or payment by German interests isn't overlooked. The dispute described above is about euro-zone reform, which is why I sought EURO on the matrix, but it to had a 100% chance to be there.
So what do I claim about the overall odds against the full matrix? Surprise - nothing (yet, anyway). You can see the spreadsheet for it below, but in researching an issue like that at hand I am mixing a priori terms with a posteriori ones. Whenever I do this I do not combine overall odds. For example, even if SARAH added great statistical value, I have no reason to suspect a Sarah. Then I why mention it? Because this article is directed at our Intel community. They have classified information that I'm not privy too. IF there is a Sarah on the list (even as a Code name or acronym) then it becomes a legitimate term. So what is my relationship to our Intel forces? Well, as I update these words at 8:54 pm on 12/9/2018 I see that a DoD and Fort Huachuca have been here at least 32 times today (the last time was at 09/Dec/2018:20:39:17 EST). Huachuca probably noticed an Arab visitor today at IP 188.8.131.52 - unless they are hiding behind this number - but it isn't one of the series of numbers that DoD generally uses. The Fort has never talked to me (except once in a mind-blowing interview in the parking lot of the Cape Canaveral Public Library on August 1, 2016).
I'd like to think my relationship to our Intel community is similar to that of the Coast Guard Auxiliary to the Coast Guard or the Civil Air Patrol to the Air Force. If I owed a boat I'd joint the Coast Guard Auxiliary and let them use the boat for port security exercises, etc. But since I only own this computer and some unique Code processing skills, I direct my voluntary efforts to aiding our Intelligence infrastructure. Since I retired from active duty (where I wrote war plans) over 11 years ago when I was 60, this is as close to active duty as I can get. Frankly, I miss it, but perhaps General Mark A. Milley, who has read my Mars research, can do something to alter my civilian/retired military status when he takes over as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff on October 1, 2019. General - if you're reading this - Semper Paratus and congratulations on your terrific promotion. Please don't overlook the fact that the day after President Trump won the White House I formally applied for a position there as a science advisor. I would also be pleased to work for you there, Sir.