JUDGE ROY MOORE, LEIGH CORFMAN AND ACCUSATIONS
The facts do not yet suffiently support allegations against Judge Moore. Updated on 11/21/2017.
Normally in America people are considered innocent until proven guilty. In fact, this assumption is true for everyone except for Republican candidates who do not comply with the Establishment, which is in part headed by “Republicans” like Senators McConnell and McCain. In fact, there are at least 29 Republican Senators who are happy to bow to traitors in the Senate that call themselves Democrats. Many of these say that Judge Roy Moore should withdraw if guilty even though the accusations against him are denied, unproven and relate to events that allegedly occurred almost 40 years ago. On Figure 1 the axis term is made of two words in sequence. The first one man either SEX or MINIMIZED, the second is HARASSMENT. For now, consider the term to be SEX HARASSMENT. It takes 11 columns and 11 rows to show this term with ROY MOORE. This match is against odds of about 420 to 1. But does the full matrix imply innocence or guilt? It definitely has bearing on the verdict. I’ll discuss tricky aspects of it further below.
On the first line of the matrix we have the word INNOCENT at skip +1 followed by the word SACRIFICE at skip +1. It is apparent that Mitch McConnell is prepared to SACRIFICE a potentially INNOCENT man so long as it ensures McConnell’s retention of his Senate Majority Leader position. If I could look past the issue of basic judicial rights for Moore, I might sympathize with McConnell, but since he has shown no ability to move President Trump’s agenda forward, I don’t. In fact, I support Moore’s echo of the President’s call to drain the swamp in Washington. That should begin with removing McConnell, Schumer, Ryan and Pelosi from office. None of them really care about anything other than their own power.
The first accuser is a woman named LEIGH CORFMAN There is an ELS of LEIGH at the same skip as SEX HARASSMENT four columns left of it. There is also an ELS of CORFMAN on the full matrix, but it's not at a special case skip (+/- 1 or the absolute skip of the axis term).
A critical piece of evidence from a second accuser (also shown on Figure1 - Beverly Nelson) is a high school year book, in which Moore supposedly wrote in December 1977, "To a sweeter more beautiful girl, I could not say, 'Merry Christmas.'" Of course, in America today, it can be dangerous to say or write Merry Christmas. I taught mostly high school science for 30 years. At the end of each year I'd get almost a hundred year books to sign. I probably wrote some items like that of Judge Moore, though not Merry Christmas because I was asked to sign them around May every year. But perhaps back in 1977 there were midyear graduations, and so the time is not necessarily a problem. Undoubtedly at some point I let some girls know or at least I implied that they were good looking. It never went beyond that, but today, sadly, a complement is suddenly interpreted as harassment. If nothing else, perhaps it would be seen as discrimination against girls who are not attractive. But frankly, when you get 15 yearbooks shoved in your face and all you want to do is start the class lest someone be tempted to start hurling spitballs, you sign with the first thing that comes into your mind. For pretty girls that was easy. For average or ugly girls with a lousy academic record, the yearbook hurtle can be challenging. I don't know how the yearbook would reach a non-teacher who is a D.A. for a signature, but assuming he was not in her class as a teacher, substitute or guest speaker, it would seem that she had to exhert some effort to obtain it. More likely, the judge is correct is declaring that he did not sign it, and in asking for a handwriting expert to evaluate the yearbook. Moore's lawyer, Phillip L. Jauregui, demanded that Nelson and her lawyer should release the yearbook to a neutral party for examination. So far Nelson has not complied. Her strategy seems to be to drag out the investigation in an effort to destroy Moore's campaign for Alabama's U.S. Senate seat. Meanwhile, on Figure1, at skip +1, is BOOK. We need the yearbook.
On the bottom line of Figure 1, touching SEX HARASSMENT, is Deuteronomy 22:14. It deals with sexual accusations against women, touching SEX HARASSMENT with BAD NAME. The sections starts:
13. If a man marries a wife, and comes to hate her,
14. and he makes a wanton accusation against her, spreading a BAD NAME against her, and he said, "I married this woman, and I came near to her and I did not find signs of virginity in her
It goes on to state in Deuteronomy 22:19 that if the girl's father can prove that she was indeed a virgin, the husband cannot divorce her all his days. In reference to this, Judge Moore signed divorced papers for Beverly Nelson. This means that she had access to a copy of his signature. Exactly how he ruled on her case needs to come out, but if she didn't like the ruling she had both motive to attack him later, and the signature to do so.
We are innocent in America until proven guilty. Judge Moore has not yet been shown to be guilty. The level of hatred on the part of Democrats towards Republicans is insanely high, and there is no reason to trust anyone who suddenly makes unsupported accusations in the final days of an election campaign that can determine the balance of power in the Senate.
I see that Judge Moore's wife is 14 years younger than he is. My wife (Kathy) is also 14 years younger than me. When I met Kathy I was 34 and she was 20. We have now been very happily married for 34 years. I notice that the judge did not deny dating girls that were 18 when he was 32. While not everyone will approve of it, it is legal. Sometimes girls will state that they are 18, but are really 17. My younger son ran into that with a girl he dated in Europe when he 20. She lied about her age. So it's likewise possible that this happened to the judge at some point to. Overall, from a moral point of view it's much better for a 32-year old man to date or marry an 18 year-old girl than for a man to date or marry another man. Judge Moore opposes gay marriage, which is one reason why so many Democrats want to destroy him.
Based on the facts brought out so far, and the matrix above, unless there is more hard evidence than a Merry Christmas in a yearbook and a signature with love on it (which I believe was often included with my signatures for girls whereas the guys got a good luck or best wishes), my advice to the good people of Alabama is to ignore the entire issue of sex abuse charges and to vote for Moore. A vote for the Democratic agenda is clearly a vote to destroy America spiritually as with Obama's pro-gay and pro-marijuana deals, and to destroy us physically as with his transfer of $151.7 billion to Iran to fund their nuclear and missile programs. This does not mean that I approve of sexual harassment, or of rapists or adulterers (Like President Clinton). But it does mean that I understand that we all make silly mistakes at times, and that 40 years is a bit too long for people to wait before complaining about them.
Note: I put up the above opinion on November 20, 2017. Despite harsh words about Roy Morre from Ivanka Trump, on November 21, 2017 President Trump agreed with me. As FoxNews.Com wrote:
President Trump minimized allegations of sexual misconduct against Alabama Republican Senate candidate Roy Moore Tuesday, telling voters not to support Moore's Democratic opponent.
"I can tell you one thing for sure," Trump told reporters as he left the White House for a Thanksgiving break at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Palm Beach, Fla. "We don't need a liberal person in there, a Democrat [Doug] Jones ... We do not need somebody that's going to be bad on crime, bad on borders, bad with the military, bad for the Second Amendment."
When pressed on the allegations against Moore, some of which date back 40 years, Trump said, "Look, he denies it ... He says it didn't happen, and you know, you have to listen to him also."
STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF FIGURE 1. As per my usual protocol, no statistical significance was assigned to the axis term, here the lowest ELS of SEX HARASSMENT in unwrapped Torah. While odds against finding ROY MOORE in 121 letters with SEX HARASSMENT are about 420 to 1, on the full 1,188-letter matrix they are reduced to about 14.7 to 1. The most significant terms on the full matrix were INNOCENT SACRIFICE and BAD NAME. Each of them was found against odds of about 64.6 to 1. LEIGH was found at a special case skip, but the name is only three letters in Hebrew and it had about an 85% chance to be found this way (not significant). CORFMAN, however, was found against odds of about 17.6 to 1. I debated about using the word VIRGIN as an a priori term, but the entire crisis is about the Judge going after innocent young girls, though it is not certain that when a teenage girl gets into a car with an adult making romantic moves she has no idea that he will try to kiss her (none of the accusers claim to have had intercourse with him). VIRGIN was found in the open text against odds of about 20.2 to 1. BOOK was found in the open text against odds of about 3 to 1. Overall the full matrix was found against odds of about 77,434,881 to 1, however so far I have not yet sought all the names of other accusers (Nelson is not on this matrix).
If you're wondering why I didn't choose ROY MOORE as the axis term the answer is simple. In Hebrew his name is only 6 letters long. I prefer 8, but sometimes come down to 7. The longer the axis term the better. The maximum skips that I examined for an axis term are from -152,402 to +152,403. The absolute total of these numbers = 304,805. That's the number of letters in Torah. Between these skips there are 5,420 ELSs of Roy Moore in unwrapped Torah (1 computer pass through the 304,805 letters of Torah). If I allow for wrapped searches (more than 1 pass) this number grows to 28,040. Dividing combined probabilities by numbers that large generally leads to no or very little statistical significance. It's much better to work with an axis term like SEX HARASSMENT which has 8 letters in Hebrew (normally the minimum length goal) and an ELS rank of 1 (that is, the lowest skip for the term).
I see that the axis term can also be translated as MINIMIZED HARASSMENT. That's O.K. If the Judge was foolish enough to be kissing minors, that's not exactly the same as raping them. It would be MINIMIZED HARASSMENT if it were against their will. While it brings into question his wisdom at the age of 32, most men have matured enough by the age of 70 that it should no longer be an issue.