Why is President Barack Obama withdrawing U.S. troops from Iraq by the end of 2011? Possibly to set the stage for an attack on Iran and Syria. On November 1, 2011, an article appeared in HaAretz entitled ISRAEL WARNS WEST: WINDOW OF OPPORTUNITY TO THWART IRAN NUCLEAR PROGRAM IS CLOSING. On November 2, 2011, and article appeared in HaAretz entitled NETANYAHU TRYING TO PERSUADE CABINET TO SUPPORT ATTACK ON IRAN. On the matrix below the axis term is ATTACK IRAN. A-priori key words parallel to each other and all at the same skip are PRESIDENT, OBAMA, and ASSHUR (SYRIA). In the open text is the a-posteriori phrase LET HIM RETURN TO HIS HOUSE LEST HE DIE IN WAR (however WAR was found a-priori) This may refer to getting our troops out of harm’s way on the ground before the attack begins in time to help Obama's reelection. Also at skip +1 are a-priori terms ISRAEL and MOON (which may relate to timing the attack). This will be discussed later. There is an ELS of BARAK/BARACK which may refer to either Israeli Minister of Defense Ehud Barak or Barack Obama.
TIMING. The November 2 HaAretz article states that, "According to Western experts' analyses, an attack on Iran in winter is almost impossible, because the thick clouds would obstruct the Israel Air Force's performance." However, the attack could be carried out by missiles (including nuclear tipped missiles). This war, after all, would be about stopping Iran from using the missiles (which might be nuclear tipped) against Israel. This is not a war that would be fought by Israel with one hand tied behind its back. On the matrix, while I only highlighted part of the expression in gray, running through the third letter of OBAMA in the open text at Genesis 7:11 is "in the second month, on the seventeenth day of the month, on that day all the fountains of the great deep burst forth, and the windows of the heavens were opened." An attack on Iran would likely involve missiles burst forth from submarines that are deep, and bombs falling from the heavens. The timing given in Genesis 7:11 is relative to Noah's life, not the present Jewish calendar. Since the U.S. expects to be out of Iraq by the end of December 2011, an attack might be suggested for February 17, 2012. On that morning, the moon is not expected to rise in Tehran, Iran until 3:14 A.M. It will be only 23.7% lit. So much of the early morning would be perfect for an aerial assault. If the attack is the evening of February 17, 2011, the moon will not rise until the following morning (February 18) at 4:05 A.M. and it will only be 14.8% lit then. This is not by any means meant to be a prediction for when the attack will occur, but if any planners are reading this, it is a suggestion for how to plan the attack. By February 17, 2011, equipment and personnel that were withdrawn from Iraq could be prepositioned at other sites as needed. The new moon in February 2012 occurs on the night of 30 Shevat which is February 23. There is a match between that date at skip +1 and IRAN TO NUKE.
STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF THE MATRIX. As per my standard protocol, no statistical significance is attached to the axis term, here the somewhat unusually long 10-letter ELS for ATTACK IRAN. PRESIDENT, OBAMA, and ASSHUR (SYRIA) are all parallel to each other and at the same skip, but it's only half the skip of the axis term. Normally, to have one key word at half the skip of the axis term, even though the two are parallel, the key word is not considered a special case skip and its frequency is found only in accordance with the Roffman Skip Formula. This usually leads to a high frequency and low significance, especially for words of 5-letter length (like OBAMA) or 4-letter length (like PRESIDENT or ASSHUR/SYRIA). Here I stick to that rule for OBAMA and find that there was about 1 chance in 6 for an ELS of his name to be somewhere on the 567-letter matrix. However, part of what I try to express for odds on a matrix deals with the structure of the matrix.
Here I want to give credit for the fact that PRESIDENT and ASSHUR/SYRIA are at the same skip as OBAMA. So what is the frequency to use for my calculation? I would have been just as happy (really more so) if I had found PRESIDENT and ASSHUR/SYRIA at the same skip as ATTACK IRAN. In that case, I would not have used the Roffman Skip Formula. Instead I would have used the frequency of those terms in Torah at skips +1, -1, and +/-N, the skip of ATTACK IRAN which was -136,664. I still use that frequency here, but to the totals I add the frequency of PRESIDENT and ASSHUR/SYRIA at skips +/- 68332, the skip of OBAMA. So basically I wind up with figures that express the odds for having PRESIDENT and ASSHUR/SYRIA at the skip of either ATTACK IRAN or OBAMA. Under these rules, the odds against PRESIDENT being at special case skip were about 6 to 1, and the odds against ASSHUR/SYRIA being at special case skip were about 11 to 1. While the full phrase LET HIM RETURN TO HIS HOUSE LEST HE DIE IN WAR was found a-posteriori, though with more forethought I might have found it a-priori because the focus of the matrix search was to see if Obama would attack Iran after pulling our troops out of Iraq, the word WAR was found a-priori. The odds against finding it on the matrix at skip +1 were about 15 to 1. ISRAEL rarely has much statistical significance because it is so high frequency, occurring 591 times in the open text in Torah. There were about 2 chances in 3 that it would be on this matrix. MOON was an a-priori word because military attacks often come at night when the moon has not yet risen. Obviously a full moon makes it easy for anti-aircraft guns to find their targets. MOON was on the matrix at skip +1 against odds of about 17 to 1. Finally, the name BARAK/BARACK was found, but not at a special case skip. It was easier to find this term than to call a coin toss correctly. Using the rules cited above, the combined odds against finding all the a-priori terms on the matrix were about 264,560 to 1 (p = 3.67 E-6).
This matrix is one of an ever growing series of matrices that have Obama parallel to, and often at the same absolute skip as the axis term. He seems to be encoded too often at the focal point of an extremely important moment in history. A few other matrices that fit the parallel requirement for the axis term with Obama follow:
WILL THE U.S. ATTACK IRAN OR WILL IT BE ISRAEL? The spreadsheet below shows that the matrix seems to be highly significant, but, of course, in reality it is only if there is such an attack. Of note is that Obama does not have to carry out the attack himself for the matrix to be validated. It may be that his withdrawal from Iraq will allow ISRAEL to carry out the attack by itself as soon as the troops of its key ally (the U.S.) are out of harm's way.