Review of Preliminary Assessment: Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (aka UFOs).
CRITIQUE OF REPORT - JULY 2, 2021
On June 25, 2021 the United States took its first step towards disclosing the truth about UFOs, or about the newest name for what has been hidden from us, UAPs which stands for Unidentified Aerial Phenomena. While Deep State/Fourth Reich Press did much to down play what was released because it never specifically mentioned aliens or extraterrestrials and because the news was released on a Friday afternoon to limit impact, the report actually made some critical revelations. The problem is that the reader has to know enough history (real history) to appreciate what clues have been put out. The people who kept the truth from us before, in many cases, likely committed crimes. Wherever that has happened, assuming it did, the motivation for their covering up of the truth most likely has more to do with them wanted to stay out of prison than it does protecting our national security. With full knowledge that Uncle Sam can oull the plug on this site whenever they desire, what I will present below will be the report they issues (in black fonts) and warning plus my commentary. I use red fonts to show what I think is willful disinformation, bordering on perjury. Brown fonts will be use to indicate what I think they have written to hide the full truth without directly lying to us. For example, the report covers the period between November 2004 and March 2021. But the famous Roswell Incident was in July, 1947 and in 1942 we fired about 1,500 shells at dozens of UFOs over Los Angeles and Long Beach. Supposedly the Army shot down one and the Navy shot down another. So this threat is not new. In fact, I will argue that it is not possible to understand U.S. or world history after World War 2 without knowing the role played by UFOs.
My commentaries and supporting evidence will be added to the article in blue right after the end of the report. This will be done after I have color-coded sections that challenge sections that are designed to mislead the public. I commend Senator Rubio (R, FL) for getting the report as it now exists done. I think he has succeeded in giving us enough rope to hang the guilty, but he is up against enormous corruption. That corruption is centered in the White House and Congress. The battle to take back our country will not be an easy one but Rubio has given us a good start.
SCOPE AND ASSUMPTIONS
This preliminary report is provided by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) in response to the provision in Senate Report 116-233, accompanying the Intelligence Authorization Act (IAA) for Fiscal Year 2021, that the DNI, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense (SECDEF), is to submit an intelligence assessment of the threat posed by unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP) and the progress the Department of Defense Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force (UAPTF) has made in understanding this threat. This report provides a n overview for policymakers of the challenges associated with characterizing the potential threat posed by UAP while also providing a means to develop relevant processes, policies, technologies, and training for the U.S. military and other U.S. Government (USG) personnel if and when they encounter UAP, so as to enhance the Intelligence Community’s (IC) ability to understand the threat. The Director, UAPTF, is the accountable official for ensuring the timely collection and consolidation of data on UAP. The dataset described in this report is currently limited primarily to U.S. Government reporting of incidents occurring from November 2004 to March 2021. Data continues to be collected and analyzed. ODNI prepared this report for the Congressional Intelligence and Armed Services Committees. UAPTF and the ODNI National Intelligence Manager for Aviation drafted this report, with input from USD(I&S), DIA, FBI, NRO, NGA, NSA, Air Force, Army, Navy, Navy/ONI, DARPA, FAA, NOAA, NGA, ODNI/NIM-Emerging and Disruptive Technology, ODNI/National Counterintelligence and Security Center, and ODNI/National Intelligence Council.
Various forms of sensors that register UAP generally operate correctly and capture enough real data to allow initial assessments, but some UAP may be attributable to sensor anomalies.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. The limited amount of high-quality reporting on unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP) hampers our ability to draw firm conclusions about the nature or intent of UAP. The Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force (UAPTF) considered a range of information on UAP described in U.S. military and IC (Intelligence Community) reporting, but because the reporting lacked sufficient specificity, ultimately recognized that a unique, tailored reporting process was required to provide sufficient data for analysis of UAP events. •As a result, the UAPTF concentrated its review on reports that occurred between 2004 and 2021, the majority of which are a result of this new tailored process to better capture UAP events through formalized reporting. •Most of the UAP reported probably do represent physical objects given that a majority of UAP were registered across multiple sensors, to include radar, infrared, electro-optical, weapon seekers, and visual observation. In a limited number of incidents, UAP reportedly appeared to exhibit unusual flight characteristics. These observations could be the result of sensor errors, spoofing, or observer misperception and require additional rigorous analysis. There are probably multiple types of UAP requiring different explanations based on the range of appearances and behaviors described in the available reporting. Our analysis of the data supports the construct that if and when individual UAP incidents are resolved they will fall into one of five potential explanatory categories: airborne clutter, natural atmospheric phenomena, USG or U.S. industry developmental programs, foreign adversary systems, and a catchall “other” bin. UAP clearly pose a safety of flight issue and may pose a challenge to U.S. national security. Safety concerns primarily center on aviators contending with an increasingly cluttered air domain. UAP would also represent a national security challenge if they are foreign adversary collection platforms or provide evidence a potential adversary has developed either a breakthrough or disruptive technology. Consistent consolidation of reports from across the federal government, standardized reporting, increased collection and analysis, and a streamlined process for screening all such reports against a broad range of relevant USG data will allow for a more sophisticated analysis of UAP that is likely to deepen our understanding. Some of these steps are resource-intensive and would require additional investment.
AVAILABLE REPORTING LARGELY INCONCLUSIVE
Limited Data Leaves Most UAP Unexplained...Limited data and inconsistency in reporting are key challenges to evaluating UAP. No standardized reporting mechanism existed until the Navy established one in March 2019. The Air Force subsequently adopted that mechanism in November 2020, but it remains limited to USG reporting. The UAPTF regularly heard anecdotally during its research about other observations that occurred but which were never captured in formal or informal reporting by those observers. After carefully considering this information, the UAPTF focused on reports that involved UAP largely witnessed firsthand by military aviators and that were collected from systems we considered to be reliable. These reports describe incidents that occurred between 2004 and 2021, with the majority coming in the last two years as the new reporting mechanism became better known to the military aviation community. We were able to identify one reported UAP with high confidence. In that case, we identified the object as a large, deflating balloon. The others remain unexplained. •144 reports originated from USG sources. Of these, 80 reports involved observation with multiple sensors. Most reports described UAP as objects that interrupted pre-planned training or other military activity. UAP Collection Challenges Sociocultural stigmas and sensor limitations remain obstacles to collecting data on UAP. Although some technical challenges—such as how to appropriately filter out radar clutter to ensure safety of flight for military and civilian aircraft—are longstanding in the aviation community, while others are unique to the UAP problem set. •Narratives from aviators in the operational community and analysts from the military and IC describe disparagement associated with observing UAP, reporting it, or attempting to discuss it with colleagues. Although the effects of these stigmas have lessened as senior members of the scientific, policy, military, and intelligence communities engage on the topic seriously in public, reputational risk may keep many observers silent, complicating scientific pursuit of the topic.•The sensors mounted on U.S. military platforms are typically designed to fulfill specific missions. As a result, those sensors are not generally suited for identifying UAP. •Sensor vantage points and the numbers of sensors concurrently observing an object play substantial roles in distinguishing UAP from known objects and determining whether a UAP demonstrates breakthrough aerospace capabilities. Optical sensors have the benefit of providing some insight into relative size, shape, and structure. Radiofrequency sensors provide more accurate velocity and range information.
But Some Potential Patterns Do Emerge. Although there was wide variability in the reports and the dataset is currently too limited to allow for detailed trend or pattern analysis, there was some clustering of UAP observations regarding shape, size, and, particularly, propulsion. UAP sightings also tended to cluster around U.S. training and testing grounds, but we assess that this may result from a collection bias as a result of focused attention, greater numbers of latest-generation sensors operating in those areas, unit expectations, and guidance to report anomalies. And a Handful of UAP Appear to Demonstrate Advanced Technology In 18 incidents, described in 21 reports, observers reported unusual UAP movement patterns or flight characteristics. Some UAP appeared to remain stationary in winds aloft, move against the wind, maneuver abruptly, or move at considerable speed, without discernable means of propulsion. In a small number of cases, military aircraft systems processed radio frequency (RF) energy associated with UAP sightings. The UAPTF holds a small amount of data that appear to show UAP demonstrating acceleration or a degree of signature management. Additional rigorous analysis are necessary by multiple teams or groups of technical experts to determine the nature and validity of these data. We are conducting further analysis to determine if breakthrough technologies were demonstrated.
UAP PROBABLY LACK A SINGLE EXPLANATION
The UAP documented in this limited dataset demonstrate an array of aerial behaviors, reinforcing the possibility there are multiple types of UAP requiring different explanations. Our analysis of the data supports the construct that if and when individual UAP incidents are resolved they will fall into one of five potential explanatory categories: airborne clutter, natural atmospheric phenomena, USG or industry developmental programs, foreign adversary systems, and a catchall “other” bin. With the exception of the one instance where we determined with high confidence that the reported UAP w as airborne clutter, specifically a deflating balloon, we currently lack sufficient information in our dataset to attribute incidents to specific explanations.
Airborne Clutter: These objects include birds, balloons, recreational unmanned aerial vehicles(UAV), or airborne debris like plastic bags that muddle a scene and affect an operator’s ability to identify true targets, such as enemy aircraft. Natural Atmospheric Phenomena: Natural atmospheric phenomena includes ice crystals, moisture, and thermal fluctuations that may register on some infrared and radar systems. USG or Industry Developmental Programs: Some UAP observations could be attributable to developments and classified programs by U.S. entities. We were unable to confirm, however, that these systems accounted for any of the UAP reports we collected. Foreign Adversary Systems: Some UAP may be technologies deployed by China, Russia, another nation, or a non-governmental entity.
Other: Although most of the UAP described in our dataset probably remain unidentified due to limited data or challenges to collection processing or analysis, we may require additional scientific knowledge to successfully collect on, analyze and characterize some of them. We would group such objects in this category pending scientific advances that allowed us to better understand them. The UAPTF intends to focus additional analysis on the small number of cases where a UAP appeared to display unusual flight characteristics or signature management. UAP THREATEN FLIGHT SAFETY AND, POSSIBLY, NATIONAL SECURITY UAP pose a hazard to safety of flight and could pose a broader danger if some instances represent sophisticated collection against U.S. military activities by a foreign government or demonstrate a breakthrough aerospace technology by a potential adversary. Ongoing Airspace Concerns When aviators encounter safety hazards, they are required to report these concerns. Depending on the location, volume, and behavior of hazards during incursions on ranges, pilots may cease their tests and/or training and land their aircraft, which has a deterrent effect on reporting.
- The UAPTF has 11 reports of documented instances in which pilots reported near misses with a UAP. Potential National Security Challenges We currently lack data to indicate any UAP are part of a foreign collection program or indicative of a major technological advancement by a potential adversary. We continue to monitor for evidence of such programs given the counter intelligence challenge they would pose, particularly as some UAP have been detected near military facilities or by aircraft carrying the USG’s most advanced sensor systems.
EXPLAINING UAP WILL REQUIRE ANALYTIC, COLLECTION AND RESOURCE INVESTMENT
Standardize the Reporting, Consolidate the Data, and Deepen the Analysis In line with the provisions of Senate Report 116-233, accompanying the IAA for FY 2021, the UAPTF’s long-term goal is to widen the scope of its work to include additional UAP events documented by a broader swath of USG personnel and technical systems in its analysis. As the dataset increases, the UAPTF’s ability to employ data analytics to detect trends will also improve. The initial focus will be to employ artificial intelligence/machine learning algorithms to cluster and recognize similarities and patterns in features of the data points. As the database accumulates information from known aerial objects such as weather balloons, high-altitude or super-pressure balloons, and wildlife, machine learning can add efficiency by pre-assessing UAP reports to see if those records match similar events already in the database.
- The UAPTF has begun to develop interagency analytical and processing workflows to ensure both collection and analysis will be well informed and coordinated.
The majority of UAP data is from U.S. Navy reporting, but efforts are underway to standardize incident reporting across U.S. military services and other government agencies to ensure all relevant data is captured with respect to particular incidents and any U.S. activities that might be relevant. The UAPTF is currently working to acquire additional reporting, including from the U.S. Air Force (USAF), and has begun receiving data from the Federal Aviation Administration(FAA).
- Although USAF data collection has been limited historically the USAF began a six-month pilot program in November 2020 to collect in the most likely areas to encounter UAP and is evaluating how to normalize future collection, reporting, and analysis across the entire Air Force
.•The FAA captures data related to UAP during the normal course of managing air traffic operations. The FAA generally ingests this data when pilots and other airspace users report unusual or unexpected events to the FAA’s Air Traffic Organization.
- In addition, the FAA continuously monitors its systems for anomalies, generating additional information that may be of use to the UAPTF. The FAA is able to isolate data of interest to the UAPTF and make it available. The FAA has a robust and effective outreach program that can help the UAPTF reach members of the aviation community to highlight the importance of reporting UAP.
The UAPTF is looking for novel ways to increase collection of UAP cluster areas when U.S . forces are not present as a way to baseline “standard” UAP activity and mitigate the collection bias in the dataset. One proposal is to use advanced algorithms to search historical data captured and stored by radars. The UAPTF also plans to update its current interagency UAP collection strategy in order bring to bear relevant collection platforms and methods from the DoD and the IC.
Increase Investment in Research and Development
The UAPTF has indicated that additional funding for research and development could further the future study of the topics laid out in this report. Such investments should be guided by a UAP Collection Strategy, UAP R&D Technical Roadmap, and a UAP Program Plan.
APPENDIX A - Definition of Key TermsThis report and UAPTF databases use the following defining terms:Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP): Airborne objects not immediately identifiable. The acronym UAP represents the broadest category of airborne objects reviewed for analysis.
UAP Event: A holistic description of an occurrence during which a pilot or aircrew witnessed (or detected) a UAP.UAP Incident: A specific part of the event.UAP Report: Documentation of a UAP event, to include verified chains of custody and basic information such as the time, date, location, and description of the UAP. UAP reports include Range Fouler
1 reports and other reporting.1 U.S. Navy aviators define a “range fouler” as an activity or object that interrupts pre-planned training or other military activity in a military operating area or restricted airspace.
APPENDIX B – Senate Report Accompanying the Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021Senate Report 116-233, accompanying the Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021, provides that the DNI, in consultation with the SECDEF and other relevant heads of USG Agencies, is to submit an intelligence assessment of the threat posed by UAP and the progress the UAPTF has made to understand this threat.
The Senate Report specifically requested that the report include:
1.A detailed analysis of UAP data and intelligence reporting collected or held by the Office of Naval Intelligence, including data and intelligence reporting held by the UAPTF;
2.A detailed analysis of unidentified phenomena data collected by:
a. Geospatial Intelligence
b. Signals Intelligence;
c. Human Intelligence; and
d. Measurement and Signatures Intelligence
3.A detailed analysis of data of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, which was derived from investigations of intrusions of UAP data over restricted U.S. airspace;
4.A detailed description of an interagency process for ensuring timely data collection and centralized analysis of all UAP reporting for the Federal Government, regardless of which service or agency acquired the information;
5.Identification of an official accountable for the process described in paragraph 4;
6.Identification of potential aerospace or other threats posed by the UAP to national security, and an assessment of whether this UAP activity may be attributed to one or more foreign adversaries;
7.Identification of any incidents or patterns that indicate a potential adversary, have achieved breakthrough aerospace capabilities that could put U.S. strategic or conventional forces at risk; and
8.Recommendations regarding increased collection of data, enhanced research and development, additional funding, and other resources.
ROFFMAN COMMENTARY. REPORT PAGE 1. WORD IN QUESTION: UNCLASSIFIED. There is a classified version. How much more it offers is not yet known to me but if there are not alien spacecraft here our Government ought to be able to clearly say that. If ET is here we need to know what he's doing here. The report indicates that we are indeed seeing objects that have extraordinary speed and maneuverability capabilities. Are these capabilities matched by abductions and an explanation for missing people? An estimated 8 million children are said to go missing each year, worldwide. Around 800,000 are from the U.S., 40,000 each year in Brazil, 50,500 in Canada, 39,000 in France, 100,000 in Germany, 45,000 in Mexico, and an estimated 230,000 go missing in the United Kingdom every year. The autopsy results of the Kennedy Assassination are also not completely unclassified at this time. This feeds the conspiracy theorists. President Trump wanted to release all information about it is 2018, but put off the more important information until at least October, 2021. The Kennedy assassination is mentioned here because there is a wide body of literature linking it and UFOs. Dr. Michael E. Salla's book, Kennedy's Last Stand: Eisenhower, UFOs, MJ-12 & JFK's Assassination concludes as follows on pages 228-229:
James Jesus Angleton acted as the official gatekeeper for the CIA's UFO secrets. He had an extensive international network for learning about UFO extraterrestrial activity anywhere on the planet. Anyone with knowledge would be monitored by Angleton's CI division. The MJ-12 Group's assassination directive gave Angelton a license to kill. If anyone threatened to reveal classified UFO secrets, they would be eliminated by using any of the CIA's well trained assassins. This had been the fates of James Forrestal and Marilyn Monroe; it now became the fate of President John F. Kennedy.
The Assassination Directive was known Project Environment. Angleton (December 9, 1917 – May 11, 1987) was chief of counterintelligence for the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) from 1954 to 1975. His official position within the organization was Associate Deputy Director of Operations for Counterintelligence (ADDOCI). Forrestal was the (likely murdered) Secretary of the Navy and first Secretary of Defense. In the past I have not included Angleton's name because the reality of UFOs was not confirmed even though I saw one on my 10th birthday in 1957 (see Figure 3). However, now that the Government admits that UFOs/UAPS are real it's time to review all claims about encounters with them and the impact on people who knew the truth.
ROFFMAN COMMENTARY. REPORT PAGE 2. REMARK IN QUESTION: "The dataset described in this report is currently limited primarily to U.S. Government reporting of incidents occurring from November 2004 to March 2021." This restriction paints an innaccurate portrait about how long our military has been confronting UAPs and the intensity of its response. Even 5 years before the famous Roswell Incident there was the spectacular Los Angeles Air Raid on the night of February 24, 1942 and on into early February 25, 1942. About 25 unidentified targets were picked up on radar 120 mies west of Los Angeles. Antiaircraft batteries were alterted at 0215. At 0221 a blackout was ordered. At 0243 planes were reported near Long Beach. At 0306 a red flare was seen over Santa Monica and four batteries of anti-aircraft open fired with 1,440 rounds of antiarcraft ammunition. Residents along a 40 mile arc at the coast watched the show of big gun fire and searchlights.
TBD: DISCUSSION OF OPERATION HIGHJUMP OFF ANTARCTICA IN 1947. For Antarctica in the Codes see http://arkcode.com/images/antarctica.png.
ROFFMAN COMMENTARY. REPORT PAGE 3. REMARK IN QUESTION: The limited amount of high-quality reporting on unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP) hampers our ability to draw firm conclusions about the nature or intent of UAP. This is a huge lie. We have all the data needed. We have been back engineering alien craft ever since we recovered them in the 1940s. In fact, by 1960 my father's brother, Eugene Roffman, was deeply involved in analyzing them via nondestructive testing, and he was doing it in conjunction with not only NATO, but even with the Soviet Union and its Warsaw Pact (communist) Polish allies. He gave me the list of involved scientists and nations involved. It follows as Figure 1.
My Uncle was not the only person in our family who had immediate access to information about UFOs. His nephew, Stan Gross, told me on December 24, 1997 that he had been shown the Roswell craft. Stan was a Test Launch Director at the Kennedy Space Center. As Figure 2 will show, Stan played a major role in getting a lunar rover to the moon on Apollo 15. He was the Rover Manager. One of the two astronauts on the moon for that mission was Edwin Irwin. Clark McClelland was a ground test astronaut for the space shuttle fleet. He worked personally with all our astronauts up through about 1991. Clark told me that when he met up with Irwin by chance at the Philadelphia International Airport, Irwin told him that he had seen multiple buildings and UFOs while he was on the moon. The ignorance that NASA pretends to have in their disclosure report would be comical until you understand crimes committed by those directing the cover-up. The smartest thing that NASA leadership can do now is to retract the report with its minor concessions and half-truths that are easy to see through, and publish something much closer to the actual truth. The facts that relate to who has what kind of spacecraft will be relatively easy to put out. The information about actions taken by the Deep State/Fourth Reich will be much harder and more dangerous to publish.
When it comes to drawing conclusions about the nature or intent of UAP the report is woefully short of being fair. All emphasis is placed on photographic or other sensor analysis of the craft seen. However there is zero emphasis on claims of abduction. An abduction is a kidnapping. It is a felony. For those who claimed to be abductees, the report is like a case where after a lifetime of damage caused by abductions and dispersion placed on the character the abductees, who in many cases may have lost their jobs based on their claims, the "court" finds that yes, there was a car involved in the incident but it can't prove that the car was operated by a person or a natural process. In many cases an examination may yield evidence of biological contact, yet the report is devoid of examination for such evidence or discussion of it. And yet it is clear they were aware of the human element to such encounters. On page 4 the report states:
UAP Collection Challenges Sociocultural stigmas and sensor limitations remain obstacles to collecting data on UAP...
Narratives from aviators in the operational community and analysts from the military and IC describe disparagement associated with observing UAP, reporting it, or attempting to discuss it with colleagues. Although the effects of these stigmas have lessened as senior members of the scientific, policy, military, and intelligence communities engage on the topic seriously in public, reputational risk may keep many observers silent, complicating scientific pursuit of the topic.
How many Americans Claim to have been abducted? Wikipedia cites the Roper Report as follows:
In 1991, Hopkins, Jacobs and sociologist Dr. Ron Westrum commissioned a Roper Poll in order to determine how many Americans might have experienced the abduction phenomenon. Of nearly 6,000 Americans, 119 answered in a way that Hopkins et al. interpreted as supporting their ET interpretation of the abduction phenomenon. Based on this figure, Hopkins estimated that nearly four million Americans might have been abducted by extraterrestrials. The poll results are available at this external link: Abduction by Aliens or Sleep Paralysis
ROFFMAN COMMENTARY. REPORT PAGE 3. REMARK IN QUESTION a catchall “other” bin. Here NASA is repeating the same trick that they employed when they learned that there are large bright lights on the asteroid named CERES. Rather than give us a coherent explanation of what the lights are, they asked the public for our opinion. This may seem OK, however the problem lies with the choices that we were given. On October 19, 2015 the public had voted for ice (backed by 28%), volcano (10%) salt deposit (11%), geyser (6%), rock (6%) and "other" (39%). Why couldn't they simply offer alien life as a choice? That they don't want to go there is reminiscent of the mocking attitude often displayed toward people who report UFOs. It is why when people hear the name NASA they see it as a joke - an abbreviation for NEVER A STRAIGHT ANSWER.
Salla's newest book, published in March, 2021, is SPACE FORCE, OUR STAR TREK FUTURE. In it, while he does not mention the lights of Ceres, he should have. On page 193 of his book Salla states:
According to multiple insiders, for decades outer space has been used by rogue SSPs (Secret Space Programs) and their hidden control groups to manipulate humanity through multiple egregious practices that have escaped public awareness and scrutiny. These practices include genetic experiments conducted with captive humans, false flag operations, off world bases using forced labor to build advanced technologies for interstellar trade, and, most controversial of all, a galactic slave trade. In addition, secret agreements have been reached with a breakaway German-led space program that was first established in Antarctica, but later established bases on Mars, Ceres and elsewhere in our solar system. These agreements have allegedly led to extensive collaboration with a German "Dark Fleet" (aka Nacht Waffen) that uses tens of thousands of highly trained US military personnel and scientists for nefarious missions."
ROFFMAN COMMENTARY. REPORT PAGE 3. REMARK IN QUESTION: may pose a challenge to U.S. national security. I wrote war plans for the Coast Guard and the Navy. I'm more than ready do so for Space Force if asked, but as I'm 74 I doubt that I'll get the chance. A sample description of what I did is in the citation for my Meritorious Service Medal. When writing such a plan the potential enemies are listed and or described in an Appendix to Annex B (Intelligence) - perhaps Essential Elements of Information. The friends go in Annex A (Task Organization). People are named for what they are. There are two potential types of enemies here that need to be named: aliens, be they Nordic, Reptilians and Greys and humans (Germans and Deep State/Fourth Reichers. At a minimum the word aliens should be used in place of others.
ROFFMAN COMMENTARY. REPORT PAGE 5. REMARK IN QUESTION: Some UAP may be technologies deployed by China, Russia, another nation, or a non-governmental entity. Because there are many potential enemies in the Deep State/Fourth Reich that are high in the American Government, a separate/new security clearance will be required to factor in these people without jeopardizing their safety. There is evidence that the enemy is within us. President Eisenhower's final remarks in office on January 17, 1961 were about not trusting the Military Industrial Complex. Some of the people who worked their way up there were German scientists like Wernervon Braun, who built our Apollo 5 moon rocket, but who also was a Nazi war criminal brought here along with 1,600 Germans as part of Operation Paperclip in 1947. Dr. Michael E. Salla interview an American Historian named Harry Cooper who claimed that Hitler himself escaped to South America on U-944 at end of World War 2. Almost 40 years ago I met Cooper and we both came to the same conclusion. Salla went much further than I did on this in elaborating Nazi/alien bases at Antarctica, but in particular he claims that a combined Nazi/alien for attacked our Task Force 68 in 1947, shooting down about 27 of our planes and sinking a few of our surface ships with craft that came out of underwater launching points north of Antarctica. My point here is that the threats from nations on Earth may well be from not just Russia and China, but even from what survived from the Third Reich in Germany... from what now survives as a secret Fourth Reich.
ROFFMAN COMMENTARY. REPORT PAGE 5. REMARK IN QUESTION: Some UAP appeared to remain stationary in winds aloft, move against the wind, maneuver abruptly, or move at considerable speed, without discernable means of propulsion. The report should cite specific g forces and speeds.
Figure 2 - Stan Gross knew more than how to get the lunar rover to the moon on Apollo 15. He was shown the Roswell wreckage and he told me that our Government had a continuing relationship with aliens.
FIGURE 3 - 1952 UFOs and BIRTHDAY UFO IN 1957.
FIGURE 4 - Antarctica and UFO in the Code.