CIA'S MIKE POMPEO HAS REAL ATOMIC THREAT CONCERNS
He is encoded with Intelligence, Agency, Atomic and Threat. Let's pray that he serves us all well. Updated on 1/31/2017
President Trump chose Mike Pompeo as his Director of the Central Intelligence Agency. It was, perhaps, a divinely inspired choice. On the matrix below the axis term is MIKE POMPEO. At the same skip is INTELLIGENCE. AGENCY is at skip -1. ATOMIC is at exactly the twice the skip of the axis term and THREAT is at the same skip as ATOMIC Does the matrix give us any hint about the nature of the threat? Perhaps. The word MAIL touches ATOMIC A word for DIRT (or dust) shares a letter with POMPEO and a verb for TO DIRTY is also on the matrix. Thus the matrix may warn Pompeo that someone will attempt to mail a dirty radioactive bomb or bombs into the U.S. ISRAEL is in the open text, touching ATOMIC, so they may be threatened this way too. EGYPT is elsewhere in the open text.
STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF THE MATRIX. As per my usual protocol, no statistical significance was assigned to the axis term, here the lowest skip for a 9-letter transliteration of MIKE POMPEO in unwrapped or wrapped Torah. On the full 775-letter matrix the most significant a priori term was AGENCY. It was found at a special case skip (+/- 1 or the absolute skip of the axis term) against odds of about 39.8 to 1. The second most significant term was AGENCY which was found against odds of about 13.2 to 1. ATOMIC is parallel to the axis term but at twice the skip of ATOMIC. Under my protocol that does not qualify as a special case skip. One of two synonyms sough for INTELLIGENCE was found at a special case skip against odds of about 7.4 to 1. Because it's easier for an enemy to develop a "dirty bomb" with radioactive contaminants than a fission fusion weapon, I looked for DIRT and DIRTY. An ELS of DIRT crossed and shared a letter peh with POMPEO, but it was not at a special case skip. With no extra value placed on it for its location, there was a 54.7% chance to find it somewhere on the full matrix. The verb DIRTY was found on the matrix against odds of about 11 to 1, but again it was not at a special case skip. MAIL was not statistically significant by itself, but the fact that it touches ATOMIC may be (I also sought airplane, truck and train as delivery means, but did not find them by standard methods - although train means came up with a separate experiment described in part elsewhere on my site). Again, ISRAEL is not statistically significant by itself, but the fact that it also touches ATOMIC may be. An ELS ofTHREAT is almost certain to be found on a 775-letter matrix, but thisTHREAT is at the same skip as ATOMIC and only two columns to the right of it.
I don't add statistical value for term location, but for my military intel buddies who read my findings, I think location is worthy of note. With no value allowed for EGYPT, I rate the large matrix as found against odds of about 120,480 to 1, but I think it's more reasonable to just focus on the 408 letters with the white background. That matrix excludes AGENCY, DIRT, and DIRTY. Odds against it were 1,830 to 1. That's not as significant as the full matrix, but again these odds do not place emphasis on term locations, and I think that a protocol could be developed that would incorporate this important information.
ON MIKE POMPEO AS TRUMP'S CHOICE FOR CIA DIRECTOR. The fact that Director Pompeo finished first in his class at West Point places him in a Superman category. It was therefore only natural that he would go on to acquire his Doctorate in law at Harvard. Pompeo founded Thayer Aerospace and Private Security. Because he has an aerospace background I checked to see if terms related to aliens or UFOs were significantly encoded with his name. They were not. In glancing through his positions I find that I agree with almost all of them except for his advocacy of executing Edward Snowden. My web sites are monitored on a near daily basis by U.S. military intelligence and frankly I'm really happy that they are here so often. I try hard to make my findings useful to them. But I am not in favor of a Big Brother-type Government. I think Snowden did us a favor by letting us know about significant threats to our privacy. I choose to lead a very non-private life, but unless individuals are shown to be threats to our security I think that in general privacy is a precious right that we should strive to protect. If you want to know about Pompeo's other positions see Wikipedia's article about him.