VERSE PERMUTATION EXPERIMENT FOR ELS MAP 1 START

HOME PAGE Buy ARK CODE CONTENTS SLIDE SHOW Photos & Maps 251.565 MAPS Photos&Maps 2 Talmud&Names IRS Attack CHILE TSUNAMI SUPER BOWL EXODUS ROUTE Mt. Sinai Pics Ron Wyatt END of NASA UFO Onion-Drive HAITI RAHM EMANUEL Gaza Iron Wall Rabbi Glazerson CHEMICAL ALI Airline Miracle Repulsine Drive Robson&Jupiter END of All Life 2012 & END Ark to Mars TIME MACHINE & EZEKIEL CODE BASICS CODES ON TV SUPERCOLLIDER OCT 3, 2015 Time & Boson Life on Mars MARS MONOLITH SHALIT DEAL Attack Iran? Netanyahu&UN Clark McClelland OBAMA BIRTH Obama Nobel BARACK OBAMA ROMAN RAHM Past Presidents UFO DISCLOSURE VATICAN RULE CHRISTMAS ALTERING TIME Define ELS-Map ELS MAP 1 ELS MAP 2 ELS MAP 3 ELS MAP 4 ELS MAP 5 ELS MAP 11 ELS MAP 12 ELS MAP 13 ELS MAP 14 ELS MAP 15 ELS MAP 16 Compare Maps ARK HISTORY EXPEDITIONS End of Days AIR FRANCE TR-3B UFO WORMHOLES Hal Puthoff No Alien gods! H Bomb Test Time Odds Edgar Mitchell ANTIGRAVITY Jeff Savage Potter's UFO Gravitics&Time E. PODKLETNOV NIKOLA TESLA PALIN RESIGNS NETANYAHU Vatican&Hitler CFR BrzezinskI Mike Huckabee FORT HOOD Michael Jackson IRAN WAR Mousavvi Gaza Invasion ZECHARIAH ARMAGEDDON Statistics Permutation Control Text Obama&Islam Obama's School FOR MUSLIMS Obama's Safety 2008 Election PALIN IN 2012? Madoff Thief Clintons Nuclear War? Baal Zephon B. Zephon&Ark Implications Orbital View JEREMIAH Ethiopia&Ark Vendyl Jones In Jerusalem? Ark Destroyed? Titus/Rome Knights Templar Mt. Nebo/Ireland? ELIYAHU RIPS CHABAD MESSIAH NOW? Book Samples Philadelphi Rt. Sotomayor Feiglin & 2012? Dinosaurs Alien Giants Hawass&Permits Religious Tests Other Texts? Mayan Calendar Museum Killer Google&Privacy Nasrallah Olmert Livni & War Haniyeh & Gaza PALIN in 2008 Obama&McCain No Holocaust? DEFINE ELS Snooping Skip Tables Term Positions RABIN MURDER YASIR ARAFAT Moshe Feiglin Livni Math Hurricanes Walter K. York Gibraltar Odds Chem Ali Odds LINKS Get Involved ROFFMAN BIO BLOG

To verse permute the control, or not. To wrap the text, or not....these are the questions.

On July 19, 2009, after a decade old request by me for a control text in CodeFinder that was based not on the existing letter-permuted text, but rather on a verse-permuted Torah text, Dr. Robert Haralick finally sent me 10 such control texts. Why is this important? It is important because the commercially available control scrambles the Torah so thoroughly that the file is useless for matching axis terms to words in the open text of Torah. For example, in the Torah the word Israel appears 591 times at skip +1. Egypt appears 365 times in like manner But in the existing control at the same +1 skip Israel appears just once, and Egypt does not appear at all. In the new verse-permuted control files by Dr. Haralick, Israel again appears 591 times, and Egypt is there 365 times again. Thus, although axis terms will appear at different ELSs than in the real Torah, when using a verse-permuted Torah text as a control, we are just as likely to get matches of an axis term (generally appearing vertically) running through an open text term (or verse) as in the Torah. Unlike the letter-permuted Torah text which is pure nonsense to the reader, we are given a legitimate chance to explore the value of matches, especially where course angles between terms are of interest. Tables below will show how the 10 new files stacked up with comparison to the Torah and original letter-permuted files currently available on CodeFinder. This exploration is conducted based on key terms on ELS Map 1, which I believe points the way to where the Ark of the Covenant will be found.

In the first Table below we find that the minimum ELS of Ark of the Covenant found in Torah is clearly lower than all of the ELSs of this term in the 10 verse permuted and one letter permuted Torah texts. With CodeFinder with the row skip function disabled, and a maximum window of 80 columns and 80 rows, there were no matches of Ark of the Covenant with Egyptians were burying, the phrase that started my 12 year ( and ongoing) quest to find the Ark via ELS Maps in the Torah Code. This compares to the 104 letters required to put Ark of the Covenant in a box with the minimum ELS of Egyptians were burying in the Torah. When I enabled the row split function, there still were no matches seen in the verse permuted Torah with Egyptians were burying in unwrapped Torah when the computer makes only one pass through Torah. What does this mean? Well, when excluding the open text hits for Ark of the Covenant, there were 45 ELSs of Ark of the Covenant in the 10 verse permuted files, each with 8 verses that ran directly through an ELS of Ark of the Covenant. So we had 45 X 8 = 380 lines where an Egyptians were burying could theoretically appeared in the matrix with Ark of the Covenant. When we hit the row split function, we opened up another 380 lines that might have worked for a match, but with no positive results. Each window seen had 6,400 letters in it. Table 2 below shows what happens when we turn on the wrapped matrix function and allow more than one pass through the verse permuted Torah? That will surely produce many more opportunities to match Ark of the Covenant with Egyptians were burying.

While the Code required only 117 letters to show Ark of the Covenant with Bardawil, the lake the surrounds the suspect site, in the 11 control texts used, the best match (smallest matrix) under the conditions specified in Table 1 required 357 letters.

TABLE 1 - 10 TORAH TEXTS PERMUTATED AT THE VERSE LEVEL, NO ROW SPLIT PERMITTED, SEARCH AREA 80 ROWS BY 8O COLUMNS, NO WRAPPED TORAH ALLOWED (SEARCH RESTRICTED TO ONE PASS THROUGH THE TORAH)

FILE	MINIMUM ELS FOR ARK OF THE COVENANT	NUMBER OF ELS HITS FOR ARK OF THE COVENANT (6 IS THE OPEN TEXT NUMBER FOR THE TORAH FILE AND FOR ALL TORAH VERSE PERMUTED FILES)	ELS OF NON OPEN TEXT HITS FOR ARK OF THE COVENANT	SIZE OF MATRIX REQUIRED FOR AN ELS OF ARK OF THE COVENANT AND *EGYPTIANS WERE BURYING* IN THE OPEN TEXT	SIZE OF MATRIX REQUIRED FOR AN ELS OF ARK OF THE COVENANT AND AND ELS OF BARDAWIL	*SIZE OF MATRIX REQUIRED FOR AN ELS OF ARK OF THE COVENANT, BARDAWIL, AND* *EGYPTIANS WERE BURYING* IN THE OPEN TEXT
TORAH	-306	13	-306 3102 3621 -8752 9698 15677 24926	104 LETTERS	117 LETTERS	225 LETTERS
*VERSE* *PERM* 1	2087	11	2087 -11380 -18626 18897 25661	NO MATCHES	3445	NO DUAL MATCHES
*VERSE* *PERM* 2	-1033	10	-1033 5969 6073 -31877	NO MATCHES	357, 700	NO DUAL MATCHES
*VERSE* *PERM* 3	-2290	10	-2290 3254 9691 34880	NO MATCHES	844	1080
*VERSE* *PERM* 4	5572	10	5572 7671 31416 40805	NO MATCHES	363	NO DUAL MATCHES
*VERSE* *PERM* 5	2110	11	2110 -8599 -16647 -19419 -24829	NO MATCHES	1482	NO DUAL MATCHES
*VERSE* *PERM* 6	-9931	9	-9931 -12563 -17537	NO MATCHES	594	NO DUAL MATCHES
*VERSE* *PERM* 7	13478	9	13478 -14004 27935	NO MATCHES	NO MATCHES	NO DUAL MATCHES
*VERSE* *PERM* 8	12566	9	12566 -23701 -33660	NO MATCHES	NO MATCHES	NO DUAL MATCHES
*VERSE* *PERM* 9	-3513	13	-3513 -9853 -11928 -14326 23438 -31431 36527	NO MATCHES	1443	NO DUAL MATCHES
*VERSE* *PERM* 10	-6319	13	-6319 -6565 10060 17018 -19552 28600 -33037	NO MATCHES	480, 532	NO DUAL MATCHES
*LETTER PERM 1*	-7072	5	-38254	NO MATCHES	NO MATCHES	NO MATCHES

ABOVE: ELS MAP 1

TABLE 2

MATCHES OF ARK OF THE COVENANT

WITH

EGYPTIANS WERE BURING

IN WRAPPED AND UNWRAPPED TORAH AND VERSE PERMUTED TORAH

FILE	MINIMUM ELS FOR ARK OF THE COVENANT	NUMBER OF NON OPEN TEXT ELS HITS FOR ARK OF THE COVENANT WITH WRAPPED SEARCH FUNCTION DISABLED (SKIPS -43544 TO +43544) #	ELSs OF NON OPEN TEXT HITS FOR *ARK OF THE COVENANT* WITH WRAPPED MATRIX FUNCTION ENABLED (SKIPS -152202 TO +152203 SEARCHED) #	MATCHES WITH ELS OF ARK OF THE COVENANT AND *EGYPTIANS WERE BURYING* WITH WRAPPED MATRIX FUNCTION ENABLED	SIZE OF MATRIX IN LETTERS REQUIRED FOR AN ELS OF ARK OF THE COVENANT AND *EGYPTIANS WERE BURYING* IN THE OPEN TEXT
TORAH	-306	7 (-306, 3102 3621 -8752 9698 15677 24926)	35	2	104 LETTERS *@ SKIP -306; 609 LETTERS @ SKIP 133264**
*VERSE* *PERM* 1	2087	5 (2087 -11380 -18626 18897 25661)	39	5	363 LETTERS @ SKIP 29433; 1100 LETTERS @ SKIP-102512 1500 LETTERS @ SKIP 81395; 3016 LETTERS @ SKIP -82555; 972 LETTERS @ SKIP 117500
*VERSE* *PERM* 2	-1033	4 (-1033 5969 6073 -31877)	47	4	1850 LETTERS @ SKIP 82134 3100 LETTERS @ SKIP 30341 812 LETTERS @ SKIP 81268 792 LETTERS @ SKIP -134569
*VERSE* *PERM* 3	-2290	4 (-2290 3254 9691 34880)	46	4	391 LETTERS @ SKIP -40565 2016 LETTERS @SKIP 51432 1476 LETTERS @ SKIP -93843 1160 LETTERS @ SKIP 102344
*VERSE* *PERM* 4	5572	4 (5572 7671 31416 40805)	40	5	578 LETTERS @ SKIP -58552 1530 LETTERS @ SKIP 37565 1260 LETTERS @ SKIP 109588 836 LETTERS @ SKIP 146859 1044 LETTERS @ SKIP 76647
*VERSE* *PERM* 5	2110	5 (2110 -8599 -16647 -19419 -24829)	33	0
*VERSE* *PERM* 6	-9931	3 (-9931 -12563 -17537)	34	4	1568 LETTERS @ SKIP -31984 540 LETTERS @ SKIP 35854; 950 LETTERS @ SKIP 108479 1008 LETTERS @ SKIP 149930
*VERSE* *PERM* 7	13478	3 (13478 -14004 27935)	53	5	363 LETTERS @ SKIP -21087 850 LETTERS @ SKIP 34165 1400 LETTERS @ SKIP -34396 280 LETTERS @ SKIP-113463 1850 LETTERS @ SKIP -141512
*VERSE* *PERM* 8	12566	3 (12566 -23701 -33660)	34	3	1260 LETTERS @ SKIP -74120 3400 LETTERS @ SKIP-144819 1677 LETTERS @ SKIP-94062
*VERSE* *PERM* 9	-3513	7 (-3513 -9853 -11928 -14326 23438 -31431 36527)	45	9	693 LETTERS @ SKIP -23432 1700 LETTERS @ SKIP -34946; 1800 LETTERS @ SKIP -114214; 231 LETTERS @ SKIP 45084; 110 LETTERS @ SKIP 55538 1395 LETTERS @ SKIP 23438 1400 LETTERS @ SKIP -34946 1040 LETTERS @ SKIP 49273 1548 LETTERS @SKIP -110848
*VERSE* *PERM* 10	-6319	7 (-6319 -6565 10060 17018 -19552 28600 -33037)	43	4	1140 LETTERS @ SKIP -6565; 242 LETTERS @ SKIP 114429; 1008 LETTERS @ SKIP 122628; 702 LETTERS @ SKIP 147124

*Note: Skip -306 is minimum for all studies of permuted and non permuted Torah texts, wrapped and unwrapped texts, with row split function enabled and disabled. Likewise, the matrix size is 104 letters is also at minimum area for all these studies.

This match is what inspired 12 years of Code study thus far by this author.

# These numbers do not include the 6 open text mentions of Ark of the Covenant in Torah and in each of the 10 verse permuted Torah texts used.

With the wrapped matrix function enabled there were 414 ELSs of Ark of the Covenant in the 10 verse-permuted Torah texts, and 35 ELSs of Ark of the Covenant in the Torah file (again, the ELS at skip -306 is the lowest skip seen on any of these files). In addition, each of these files includes the 6 open text occurrences of Ark of the Covenant, however these 6 are not germane to the current discussion. So, with the 34 additional ELS of Ark of the Covenant in the Torah, added to the 414 in the verses permuted files, we had 448 ELSs of Ark of the Covenant (with 8 lines for each) in which there might be a match with the one occurrence in each file of Egyptians were burying. How many matches were there? With row splitting adding to the 448*8 or 3,581 lines where we would first look for matches, there were 43 matches in the verse permuted wrapped texts, and one more in wrapped Torah. The smallest matrix after the match in Torah with the -306 ELS was 110 letters (compared to 104 letters needed to show Ark of the Covenant with Egyptians were burying on ELS Map 1). This occurrence was with the 9^th permuted file, at skip 55,538 in wrapped text. Chi square values for matches of Ark of the Covenant with Egyptians were burying were as expected with the permuted files when they were not wrapped (i.e., the computer made one pass through the text), but there were many more matches than expected when the permuted files were allowed to wrap. This might indicate a need for my spreadsheet to factor in number of computer passes through the Torah when computing the significance of matches with wrapped text. If so, the new files by Dr. Haralick are already leading to a better comprehension of what it means to wrap text, especially when matching an axis term with an open text term or phrase. As can by seen by Table 3, the average row split required to match Ark of the Covenant with Egyptians were burying was close to 4. This would indicate an need to downgrade the value of such matches by a factor of 4.

TABLE 3

ROW SPLITS REQUIRED FOR

MATCHES OF ARK OF THE COVENANT

WITH

EGYPTIANS WERE BURING

IN WRAPPED AND UNWRAPPED TORAH AND VERSE PERMUTED TORAH

FILE	ELSs OF NON OPEN TEXT HITS FOR *ARK OF THE COVENANT* WITH WRAPPED MATRIX FUNCTION ENABLED (SKIPS -152202 TO +152203 SEARCHED) #	MATCHES WITH ELS OF ARK OF THE COVENANT AND *EGYPTIANS WERE BURYING*	ROW SPLIT REQUIRED FOR MATCHES WITH ELS OF ARK OF THE COVENANT AND *EGYPTIANS WERE BURYING* (NOTE: A ROW SPLIT OF 1 = NO ROW SPLIT REQUIRED FOR ARK OF THE COVENANT TO SEE EGYPTIANS WERE BURYING).
TORAH	35	2	1 1
*VERSE* *PERM* 1	39	5	3 7 7 7 5
*VERSE* *PERM* 2	47	4	7 1 7 4
*VERSE* *PERM* 3	46	4	1 6 5 4
*VERSE* *PERM* 4	40	5	1 3 5 2 5
*VERSE* *PERM* 5	33	0	N/A
*VERSE* *PERM* 6	34	4	3 5 4 3
*VERSE* *PERM* 7	53	5	7 3 7 7 1
*VERSE* *PERM* 8	34	3	5 1 7
*VERSE* *PERM* 9	45	9	3 5 1 2 7 1 1 5 5
*VERSE* *PERM* 10	43	4	4 1 5 3
AVERAGE ROW SPLIT			178/45= 3.955

# These numbers do not include the 6 open text mentions of Ark of the Covenant in Torah and in each of the 10 verse permuted Torah texts used.

The addition of these 10 verse permuted files to CodeFinder would constitute a tremendous aid for researchers trying to evaluate the significance of ELS terms intersecting open text material, especially when that material is a priori. While Egyptians were burying was not a priori on the night that I tried to find a map in the Torah, the subsequent course angles found as seen in ELS maps 1,2,3,4,5,11,2,13,14, and 15 were certainly a priori in that they were linked to real world maps.

One final note, with Dr. Rips and other Israeli researchers most in mind. Those who do not use software like CodeFinder, and who do not have the tools to explore wrapped matrices where the computer makes more than one pass through the Torah, do a great disservice to the search for a final answer about the reality of encoding. Dr. Rips and company originally focused only on encoding in the Book of Genesis, the first of the 5 Torah books. This might have been acceptable as baby steps in research when computers were infinitely slower and less powerful than what is available today, but such continued research mocks the idea that there is a Single Author of Torah. Likewise, unless there is an argument to be made that Jews should not proceed from the last word of the Torah back to the first word at the holiday of Simchat Torah each fall, there is no reason to treat wrapped matrix research as something strange.

There is a dearth of brilliant findings coming from Israel about the Codes in recent years. Perhaps this contributed to a recent reevaluation statement by Dr. Haralick in which he indicates that there are some findings which appear to be encodings because of individual p-levels, but which do not provide evidence of encodings when the whole experiment with the many key word combination sets taken into account. The evidence of encoding in these cases, if it exists, must be discovered through the p-value relationships of the different key word combination sets via the lattice structure of these sets. If there is no encoding of these kinds of findings, this would then be consistent with Barry Simon's statement, which I paraphrase, that it is possible to find similarly tight clusters of ELSs of slightly different key word sets in monkey texts and this is all that is happening in the Torah text. Put simply, too many people compute p values without accounting for what they have looked for, but not found. This concern was expressed by me on pages 61-62 and 211-212 of my Ark Code 61-62.

Few people have stressed the need to explore for a prior open text phrases that are intersected by axis (initial) search terms, and those Israelis like Dr. Rips who have the most potential to achieve potentially astounding finds are very severely handicapped by the use of archaic software. If the hang up in Israel is that CodeFinder has the New Testament, then Israelis should download the program and simply delete the New Testament files. If the loyalty is to Dr. Alexander Rotenberg and his Sof Sof Torah Version 4.03 software, then he should update his software to remove the handicap of no wrapped Torah capability. None of the Israel researchers are getting any younger. It would be fascinating to see what they could come up with if they can ever have use of adequate software. But, at a minimum, they should have the capability to see the wrapped matrices that I and other Code researchers can find on CodeFinder. Right now they can only ask Dr. Haralick to check these finds on his CodeFinder, or other personally constructed search program. This is not how science should operate. It is obvious that Anyone deliberately constructing a an ELS Code in a text like the Torah has more flexibility is arriving at matches without destroying the meaning of the text if the Encoder has the right to wrap the text. To limit the Encoder, if the Creator, is to attempt to limit the scope of His Creation. This is not to say that it is established that the Creator has so constructed the Torah. But it is to say that it is highly presumptuous to ignore such possibility simply out of loyalty to Rotenberg software.