WHAT'S KILLING THE SANITY & INTELLIGENCE OF DEMOCRATS?
We may be seeing the results of a virus, the corrupt media or something in the electromagnetic spectrum (likely microwave) that is attacking human logic. This page updated on 10/11/2018.
I'd love the chance to drive Hillary Clinton crazy the way Democrats are trying to drive Republicans like Sarah Huckabee Sanders and Senator Cruz nuts when they try to dine a restaurants in Washington. But it's not possible to drive Hillary nuts, because as the matrix above indicates, she already is insane.
This article will again look at the issue of why so many in the American electorate still fail to see what should be obvious to anyone sane. On Monday, October 8, 2018 Trump blamed "evil" people for putting Kavanaugh in a "disgraceful situation" during his confirmation process. I have voted in 12 presidential elections during my life. Six times I voted for a Democrat and six times I voted for a Republican. But the Democrat Party of today doesn't in any way resemble the one that I voted for before. It has, as President Trump indicated, morphed into a purely evil institution. It doesn't appear like many of them can be swayed by logic but those of us who are sane have got to try. If we fail, if we turn over Congress to the likes of Nancy Pelosi and Maxine Waters, they will either help our enemies destroy our nation, or, if they succeed in impeaching our President and Justice Kavanaugh, they will likely lead us into a civil war.
FIGURE 1 - STATISTICAL AND POLITICAL SIGNIFICANCE. Figure 1 shows the best match between DEMOCRAT and INSANE at a special case skip (+/- 1 or the absolute skip of the axis term which is DEMOCRAT). The most significant odds against this find (about 201 to 1) occur when these words are shown in a 1,035-letter box with CLINTON at skip -1 and DONKEY, like INSANE also at the skip of the axis term. One problem with the matrix is that the axis term is only 6 letters long. Normally I prefer 8, but 6 letters is the dictionary spelling and this results in a large number of potential matches. It was not until the 86th lowest ELS of DEMOCRAT that I got a special case skip match with INSANE, but this requires dividing the odds by 86 (the ELS rank of the axis term). If this match in 154 letters between DEMOCRAT and INSANE had occurred at the lowest skip of DEMOCRAT (-1,482) it would have been against odds of about 1,979 to 1. But at the 86th lowest skip the odds I offer are only 1,979/96 = ~23 to 1.
Calculation for the statistical significance of Figure 1.
As for political significance of the Figure 1 match between DEMOCRAT and INSANE, see the insane remark of Hillary Clinton (encouraging violence) on October 9, 2018: "You cannot be civil with a political party that wants to destroy what you stand for, what you care about," Clinton told CNN's Christiane Amanpour. "That's why I believe, if we are fortunate enough to win back the House and or the Senate, that's when civility can start again."
Figure 2 is a bit more statistically significant.
Figure 2 - Pairing of DEMOCRAT with STUPID, JUDGES and DONKY/DONKIES.
FIGURE 2 - STATISTICAL AND POLITICAL SIGNIFICANCE. Figure 2 above pairs DEMOCRAT with STUPID at the same skip. It is much more significant than Figure 1 because it is also paired with three references to the Democrat mascot - the DONKEY plus a reference to THE JUDGES. Before factoring the still high ELS rank 82 of the axis term (DEMOCRAT again), STUPID was found at a special case skip against odds of about 398 to 1. JUDGE/JUDGES was sought because of the Democrat position that a Judge nominated to the Supreme Court is guilty until proven innocent. They don't care about the lack of a single bit of evidence to corroborate allegations of criminal behavior 36 years ago. This is frankly stupid and against all traditions in American law. JUDGES was found in the open text against odds of about 15 to 1. The odds against finding one of two synonyms sought for DONKEY in the open text were about 13 to 1, but I found both terms in the open text. The first term for DONKIES was in Genesis 24:35. The second term (for DONKEY) is shown twice in Numbers 23:23. The first DONKEY (in Numbers 23:23) actually touches DEMOCRAT. So it only takes 36 letters (6 rows by 6 columns) to show these two terms together. Odds against a match this close (with the understanding that STUPID must also be on the matrix at a special case skip) are about 282 to 1. No extra value is assigned for the extra donkies. Overall Figure 2 was found against odds of about 992 to 1.
CONVERSATION WITH MY (DEMOCRAT) COUSIN. While I was writing this article (on the morning of October 9, 2018) I had a conversation with my cousin who I will simple refer to in this article as "M." He is a Conservative Jew who admits that at the age 75 he has still never once voted Republican for the presidency. While I was reluctant to bring the subject up first, he beat me to the punch by stating his belief that our nation is headed for a civil war - which he believes is to be entirely blamed on the Republican Party. Before addressing his concerns, a little background is required here.
I have loved M like a brother all my life. He taught me how to ride a bike, how to play chess, and how to reach the Franklin Institute by bus and subway when I was ten years old. I always looked up to him because when we were young he knew more Hebrew than I did, he went to an Ivy League School, and he has a master's degree in physics and a doctorate in something else (management, I think). When I wrote books, he would help edit them. When I needed math assistance for my Torah Codes or Mars research, he freely offered it. We both traveled great distances to be with each other for family events like bar mitzvahs, weddings or funerals. We now share the belief that we are headed for a bloody resolution of the split in our nation, but to my horror, if it happens we will support opposing armies.
The first point of disagreement in our conversation was about the presumption of innocence. Never once in my 71 years of life have I heard an American state that a man was presumed guilty until proven innocent - until Justice Kavanaugh had to defend himself from spurious charges about his sexual behavior 36 years ago. Yet the Democrat senators who persecuted him repeatedly alleged that no presumption of innocence was required here because it was "a job interview and not a court." While I agree that it was, in a sense, a job interview before the sexual charges were brought forth, the moment that Kavanaugh had to defend himself against (false) criminal charges (like gang rape) it became in reality a court trial on live TV. In a job interview the worst that can happen to an applicant is failure to get the job. But here Kavanaugh was confronted with extreme and unjustified defamation of character, destruction of his career, loss of the ability to teach or coach and an issue that could have theoretically led to a divorce and loss of custody of children, and even depression leading to suicide. While it should be patently obvious that the Democrat senators were way off base in forcing him into such a position with what turned out to be zero supporting evidence, I find it astounding that so many people in this nation, M included, would puppet the presumption of guilt on a matter that could destroy a person falsely accused.
I pointed out how dangerous the new philosophy is that the Democrats are espousing. Let's take the presumption of guilt over to field of education. If you tell every female American student that a woman is always assumed to be right and her accused is always presumed to be guilty, every female who is unhappy with her grades can feel free to accuse her male teachers of rape or sexual harassment. The same is true of women who actually want to have sex with their teachers, but who are rebuffed by them. In fact, that's pretty much the Genesis story of Joseph encountering Potiphar’s wife. She tried to seduce him, he rebuffed her repeatedly, she got angry, told her husband and he threw Joseph into prison (Genesis 39:1-20). If we allow this logic into education we would at a minimum have to outlaw male teachers for female students. But in reality, since an unhappy male student could also make false homosexual accusations against male teachers we'd really need to outlaw human instructors and replace them all with computer or robot/AI instructors. But this would likely be O.K. with Democrat politicians. A state where all citizens owe their living to state-granted unemployment payments is one in which the politicians have complete control of their electorate. It expands their power infinitely. This appears to be one of their ultimate goals. The only good news is that 99% of top liberal arts professors campaign donations go to Democrats. Firing them all would mean that they are no longer free to brainwash students and harass conservatives. The computers that would replace them aren't likely to be as inspiring.
Democrats have used the excuse that Justice Kavanaugh has a drinking problem as reason to oppose or try to remove him from office. Here again they have zero evidence. First of all, the Justice is now 53 years old. Any drinking that we have heard about or he admitted to (while stressing that he was never drunk enough to pass out) was when he was a high school or college student three decades ago and it was legal. But there is no proof of any intoxication. What would constitute proof would be a test taken by a police officer if Kavanaugh had been stopped for drunk driving. No such incident ever occurred, nor is it even alleged to have occurred. There is no evidence to show that he ever had to take a blood alcohol test. There simply is no data to support any concern here.
What about claims that some people saw him drunk when he was a student? Well, some people thought they saw me drunk too. Was I ever drunk (or stoned) in my life? No, not even close. The truth is that when I was young and at a party (which was pretty rare) there might have been two or three times when I pretended to be drunk because it allowed me to look funny. So how much did I drink back then? Never more than a quarter of a can of beer (about 3 ounces) - if that. I simply didn't like the taste of any alcohol back then, but I wanted to look sociable. It wasn't until I was over 30 that I acquired a taste for beer accompanied by certain foods (like a stew called cholent) for a Sabbath meal. I don't drive on the Sabbath, so I would drink a full can or bottle with my meal, but that wasn't enough to get me drunk, nor did I pretend to get drunk then because I was either sleeping over at a synagogue or at home and there were no goofy kids that I wanted to fool. Bottom line - without results from a blood alcohol test there is no evidence that the Judge was an alcoholic back then and I have heard no evidence that he has acted drunk in the last 30 years. And yet, M used the accusation that Kavanaugh was a drunk to oppose him. Why? Because M doesn't watch Fox News and all the other major news networks in America are, as the President rightly reminds us at each of his rallies - FAKE News controlled by the Democrats. Garbage in - garbage out. If you only watch CNN, NBC, CBS, and ABC News, you get a very distorted picture of reality. We need to get back to what we had in the days of Walter Cronkite - News without opinions offered. Figure 3 shows a matrix about him.
Figure 3 - Walter Cronkite was the opposite of Fake News.
I didn't tell my cousin, M, that I think he's lost his mind - or at least an important part of it that relates to free will. I just tried to reason with him, but I've known for years that he's not willing to consider that truth might at least sometimes been found beyond the bounds of the Democrat Party. It's not that M is stupid. His math skills are well beyond mine, but he seems to have a mental block on specific issues that are related to politics (or UFOs - this is discussed elsewhere on this site).
M has previously admitted that he never voted for president for anyone that's not a Democrat, though he says he has voted for some Republicans for local races. On our October 9, 2018 discussion he accused me of always voting Republican. The accusation was surprising because I have often told him before that this is far from true. I vote (at least until I began to believe that the Democrat Party has morphed into a Socialist or Communist Party) according to how I evaluate the candidate. I'm now 71. I’ve voted in 12 of 13 presidential elections (in 1996 I didn't vote because I couldn’t stand Bill Clinton or Bob Dole). I voted for the Democrat in 1968, 1976, 1984, 1992, 2000, and 2004. I voted for the Republican in 1972, 1980, 1988, 2008, 2012 and 2016. That's six Democrats and six Republicans. It was only with the election of Obama that I realized the Democrats had lost their way. I was not alone in noticing the change. On August 14, 2018 USA published an article entitled Democrats have a more positive view of socialism than capitalism, poll finds. The article states that,
According to a Gallup poll published Monday, a majority of Democrats no longer hold a positive view of capitalism, while nearly 60 percent of them feel good about socialism. More than 70 percent of Republicans, on the other hand, see capitalism positively, while only 16 percent of them have a positive view of socialism.
The positive view of socialism among Democrats, and those who lean Democrat, actually dropped a point from 58 percent in 2016. But in those same two years, positive feelings about capitalism plummeted from 56 to 47 percent.
Faith in the invisible hand of the market weakened most among young Americans. While 57 percent of those between ages 18 and 29 viewed capitalism positively in 2016, only 45 percent felt the same way in 2018.
Gallup's results reflect what many analysts and pundits have identified as a shift toward socialism within the Democratic Party. The success of self-identified socialist Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., in the 2016 Democratic presidential primary, and the upset victory of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez – a member of the Democratic Socialists of America – over incumbent Rep. Joe Crowley, R-N.Y., are often cited as evidence of that shift.
Perhaps most of these people have never heard that the economic crisis in Venezuela caused by socialism is so severe that 75 per cent of the country’s population has lost an average of 19 pounds in weight. But I'm sure Bernie Sanders knows about it. Yet he still wants us all to become socialists like him. How can so many Democrats not understand the danger that this man represents to America? Perhaps there is a physical cause. So let's start our search for an answer here with the so-called stupidity virus. Remember that viruses can be manufactured.
SO WHAT'S CAUSING UNCIVIL BEHAVIOR AMONG DEMOCRATS? I've been looking at and writing about this subject for while now. I'm smart enough to know that my observations are not appreciated by Democrats. Surely these articles don't increase the popularity of this site among liberals, however I don't write to win any popularity contests. I am also aware that the Department of Defense (DoD) in general and in particular Fort Huachuca accounts for at least half of my traffic almost every day here and at the two other sites that I maintain or heavily contribute to - marscorrect.com and davidaroffman.com. As such I write this article with the intent of stimulating research in the DoD/Intel community into whether there is a threat that has not been previously detected. That includes possible activities by rogue personnel that we previously thought were on our side.
THE STUPIDITY VIRUS HYPOTHESIS.
In 2014 there was a virus found that can cause stupidity. Excerpts of the October 31, 2014 Newsweek article entitled "American Researchers Discover Stupidity Virus" are given below." My comments are shown in blue bold fonts.
American scientists have located a virus that attacks human DNA, which may cause those infected to be less intelligent, impairing brain activity, learning and memory.
Researchers from Johns Hopkins School of Medicine and the University of Nebraska have identified traces of an algal virus, known as ATCV-1, in throat swabs drawn from healthy volunteers which appeared to lessen their mental capacity.
The researchers had originally been working on an unrelated study into throat microbes when they unexpectedly located traces of ATCV-1 in human DNA samples. At first the research team, led by Dr Robert Yolken of Johns Hopkins, didn’t know what ATCV-1 was, and had to carry out a database search to find out more about the unknown virus.
ATCV-1 typically infects a species of green algae found in lakes and rivers, and has not previously been known to infect humans. However, when Yolken’s team screened a group of 92 healthy volunteers who were taking part in a study on cognitive function, the virus was found to be present in 43.5% of them.
MY COMMENT: Compare the 43.5% of affected humans with the 2016 Presidential Election vote where Clinton got 48% of the vote and Trump won 46% of the vote, though he won the electoral college by 304 to 227 votes.
According to the study, those infected with the virus performed around 10% worse on tests analysing visual processing speeds. In one test, infected volunteers were slower to draw a line connecting a sequence of numbers randomly distributed on a page than their uninfected counterparts.
The researchers found that the presence of the virus was linked to lower attention spans and decreased spatial awareness, and a “statistically significant decrease in the performance on cognitive assessments of visual processing and visual motor speed”. Researchers found no connection between slower brain function and variables such as differences in sex, education level, income, race, and even cigarette smoking.
The team carried out further tests, in which they injected uninfected and infected green algae into the mouths of mice and put them through a series of lab tests. The results revealed that infected animals took 10% longer to find their way out of mazes and spent 20% less time exploring new objects than uninfected mice, conforming to the findings amongst human volunteers. According to the study, the virus appeared to impair the “learning, memory formation, and the immune response to viral exposure” of the mice.
Professor James L. Van Etten of the University of Nebraska, who was a member of the research team, told Newsweek that little is currently known about how the virus could be transmitted to humans in such abundance, but that they had “no reason to believe that [the viruses] are contagious among people or animals”.
Van Etten said that the team has yet to identify any potential indicators of the virus’s presence in humans. “My best guess is that these viruses may infect another microorganism besides the algae that we have been studying... This other microorganism may be the way that the virus gets into the throat,” he added.
Figure 4 shows two maps that help to make clear the correlation between population density and political affiliation. In general, the higher the population density, the more likely that voters will be Democrats. However, the concern here is that if a pathogen is involved, the higher the population density the more likely a pathogen like a virus is to spread. Again, as was shown above, there is at least one virus that can cause stupidity. The problem with this hypothesis is that the virus has to produce extremely specific results. So, for example, it has to affect my cousin's brain in such a way as to cloud his political judgment, but not his mathematical ability.
M alleged that I only like Trump because I live in the south. I have thus, he seemed to imply, been contaminated - so I'm now a southern hick. I reminded him that his beloved Pennsylvania, as northern as it is, was won by President Trump in the last election. However, in line with what I wrote above, where the population was high - Philadelphia (his area) and Pittsburgh - the Democrats won. Fortunately, people have been leaving Philly en masse (as I did) for a long time. So as the city population has dropped the importance of the rural areas of Pennsylvania has increased. Trump won all that solidly - and thus all 20 Electoral College votes from the state (270 are necessary to win the presidency).
Figure 4 - Two maps that help to make clear the correlation between population density and political affiliation. In general, the higher the population density, the more likely that voters will be Democrats. However, the concern here is that if a pathogen is involved, the higher the population density the more likely a pathogen like a virus is to spread.
MY FAVORED HYPOTHESIS: USING ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION TO BRAINWASH PEOPLE.
Given the enormous invasions of our brains by massive electromagnetic signals, especially with cells phones attached to so many heads on an almost nonstop basis, my bet is that this will turn out to be the real mechanism on brainwashing. The enormous growth of cell phone and Internet use over the last two decades has provided an ideal way to literally get into our brains. In the last year I have made it a habit that when walking on the beach or swimming in our pool here in Cape Canaveral, Florida, I check for the percent of people around me who have a cell phone in the hand. Results? Anywhere from 35 to 60%. Even when kids are sloshing through the surf I see cell phones in their hands. Around our pool the percent of users at any moment is generally around 50%. It seems like a great many Americans are unable to function without a cell phone in their hand. Here, in particular, I will call attention to the research of Colonel John Alexander.
In 1980 COL Alexander published an article in the U.S. Army’s journal, MILITARY REVIEW, "The New Mental Battlefield," referring to claims that telepathy could be used to interfere with the brain’s electrical activity. This caught the attention of senior Army generals who encouraged him to pursue what they termed "soft option kill" technologies. The colonel and I have a common friend, Commander C. B. Scott Jones, U.S. Navy retired. We have often discussed Alexander's research. You can read what have previously written about CDR/Dr. Jones elsewhere on this site. I also discuss COL Alexander in my article about UFO teleportation.
Scott has told me about a likely mind control experiment done with, of all people, Michael Drosnin as the subject before he wrote THE BIBLE CODE, the very book that lead to all of my Codes research. Evidently Drosnin had heard about experiments in to mind control. He asked Senator Claiborne Pell to help him get an interview with the FBI about it. Pell agreed to do so, but only if Scott accompanied him (Scott was Pell's top aid until three weeks before this incident). The FBI reluctantly agreed, but took them into a basement interrogation room. Drosnin presented a list of people suffering from what Scott thought was a frequency-induced illness. Frankly the incident sounded a lot like (microwave) attacks against the U.S. Embassies in Moscow and Havana. Drosnin was then almost knocked out by what might have been a sample of the weapon. Scott stopped the interview and helped almost carry Drosnin out to the street. Drosnin didn't remember how he got there, and he had subsequent attacks including in his shower - causing him to stop the investigation. He then switched his research to The Bible Code which he published (hardcover) in 1997 (softcover in 1998), setting off my own research into the Bible (really, Torah) Code field. As for COL Alexander, in my teleportation article I wrote the following:
With respect to Colonel John Alexander, although he is a close friend of both Dr. Jones and Dr. Puthoff, I haven’t yet met him, but I have seen him on television. He seems to like to be on TV or radio. The one time that I did see him on TV gave me cause to wonder about him. My son didn’t get to be a college senior at the age of 18 without a lot of nagging on my part. One night I noticed him playing video games after his homework. I demanded that he find something worthy of his brain on TV. We turned it on, and lo and behold – there was Colonel Alexander. I believe that he was talking about how mind control might be achieved from orbit. We all wondered whether the urge to turn on the TV was due to a beamed down suggestion to check him out.
NOTE TO DOD: If Colonel Alexander turns out to be the right thread to follow, you guys know about it. My message to you in this case is simple. Like every other weapon system we develop, it should be used against the enemy, not Americans like Michael Drosnin, and certainly not against the American electorate! Keep your eye on our common prize - the U.S. Constitution.