NICK CRUZ IS ENCODED AS A SHOOTER. But why is Obama here?

When I heard about the latest sickening mass shooting in Parkland, Florida I initially sought information in the Codes that might shed some light on what was behind it. I found a lot, as is shown on Figure 1, but it seemed baffling at first. There was not much surprise when I found NICK CRUZ at the same skip as SHOOTER. That the two terms were connected by an open text declaration HE HAS BEEN GUILTY was interesting, but an a posteriori find that's not included in my probability calculation. That doesn't mean that it's unimportant, it only means that I didn't guess it would be there before conducting the experiment. I checked for four spellings for Trump, but only found a poor 4-letter spelling that required expansion of the matrix to 1,196 letters to show it. What was absolutely shocking was that, almost as an afterthought, I found a transliteration of OBAMA at the same skip as NICK CRUZ and in the column just left of NICK CRUZ and touching his name! It only took 22 letters to show OBAMA with NICK CRUZ, and just 98 letters to show OBAMA, NICK CRUZ, and SHOOTER all at the same absolute skip. I asked, "Why is Obama here?" And then I remembered what I had written before about mass shootings, and about a book named LIBERTY'S LAST STAND (2016) by Stephen Coonts (discussed below). But there is more. In the open text running into and sharing the first letter (nun) with his name is YOU SHALL NOT AFFLICT THE ORPHAN. Cruz was adopted at birth. This 168-letter matrix again illustrates that future events were sent back in time to Moses.

STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF FIGURE 1.  As per my usual protocol, no statistical significance was assigned to the axis term, here the 3rd lowest skip of NICK CRUZ in unwrapped or wrapped Torah. The most significant a priori key word found was a transliteration of OBAMA.  We look at three issues on the spreadsheet above. First, what were the odds against finding one of two transliterations of OBAMA in 22 letters with NICK CRUZ?  Note that on the spreadsheet I use an area of 11 letters rather than 22. Why? Because in the column with NICK CRUZ there too many letters that conflict with OBAMA, no way to fit in his name with the killer, and thus to get Obama in with Nick Cruz in 22 letters we are forced to use only the 11 letters in the adjoining column. When ELS rank 3 of the axis term is factored in, the match was found against odds of about 1,539 to 1. It is thus a truly noteworthy match. The Author of the Codes may be trying to alert us that Obama and his allies will use the event to try to undo our Second Amendment rights (see Obama's tweet on the bottom of Figure 1), or He may be implying a deeper problem. I don't have direct evidence of the second possibility, but a full investigation should bear it in mind.

       The second calculation above shows that OBAMA and SHOOTER are both in 98 letters at the same absolute skip as NICK CRUZ against odds of about 7,760 to 1.

       The third calculation is for OBAMA and SHOOTER at the same absolute skip as NICK CRUZ plus  FATHERLESS/ORPHAN in the open text on a 168-letter matrix against odds of about 372,716 to 1. Note: There was a slight variation to my normal protocol here. Normally for a word at skip +1 or in the open text I use the frequency at skip +1 for the calculation. This word occurs 20 times at skip +1. But on looking for the words FATHERLESS and ORPHAN in the English, they only occurred 13 times. The 7 other ELS at skip +1 will be made of up other words or combinations of words that have nothing to do with being fatherless. Had I used the frequency of 20 rather than 13 then I would say that the matrix occurred against odds of about 242,732 to 1. But the need here to to emphasize what means fatherless, because not only did this apply to NICK CRUZ, it also applies to another evil man with psychological problems - the one who chose to use this incident for political purposes as is shown with the Tweet below the matrix. I speak of Obama, whose father also abandoned him at birth too.

       Now, I mentioned LIBERTY'S LAST STAND above. It's one of the best novels that I've read in recent years. I've previously highlighted the book in my article about the Las Vegas shooter, Stephen Paddock, and in my article about Natalia Veselnitskaya.

       Publisher's Weekly sums up the book as follows:

President Barry Soetoro, the villain of bestseller Coonts's provocative thriller, is due to leave office in five months when he uses a convenient terrorist attack to declare martial law, adjourn Congress, suspend the Constitution and the Bill of Rights (especially the first and second ammendments), and become the dictator of the United States. He fires CIA director Jake Grafton and throws him in a federal detention center in West Virginia along with hundreds of conservative politicians and political commentators. Grafton's ex-CIA pal, decides he's going to bust his old boss out of jail. Meanwhile, Texas secedes from the union and begins seizing U.S. military bases. Soetoro's opponents have a long list of gripes: he's a "self-proclaimed black messiah," "Soetorocare" is a disaster, and EPA regulations are "designed to save the climate at the expense of the working men and women of Texas." Coonts's excellent action scenes, which shift between Tommy's jailbreak scheme and the civil war with Texas, grind to a halt as characters stop to give fervent speeches about freedom. Those who don't care for Obama or his policies will find a lot to like.

What didn't the above summary tell us? Actually, it amazes me that so few people in America know this. When Obama lived in Indonesia his legal name was Barry Soetoro.

Figure 2 shows that is we just add CLINTON at skip -1 that takes the matrix up to 528 letters in area and alters the odds against it to 133,817 to 1 (using 13 as the frequency of FATHERLESS/ORPHAN  in the KJV). 

FIGURE 3 EXPANDS UPON FIGURE 1 MORE, AND THE EXPANSION IS WORTH IT. While I'm not ready to say that liberals like Obama, Clinton, or other Deep State members took warnings to the F.B.I. about Nicholas Cruz and weaponized them to push their anti-gun agenda to somehow convince Cruz to act on his threats, it is certainly true that liberals like Obama and Senator Nelson of Florida immediately seized on the incident as ammunition for their anti-gun agenda. Nelson's words in the Senate were immediately followed by anti-gun rights advertisements in Florida. FoxNews.com reported the following:

Following the deadly school shooting in Parkland, Florida, Sen. Bill Nelson (D-Fla.) said this could be the "turning point" in the effort to restrict assault weapons.

17 people were killed and 14 were injured when 19-year-old Nikolas Cruz opened fire at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School on Wednesday. Cruz reportedly bought the weapon legally in Florida when he was 18.

"I have hunted all my life. I still hunt with my son. But an AR-15 is not for hunting. It's for killing," Nelson said during an appearance in Parkland Friday morning.

"It is time for us to start a serious effort to try to wear down the opposition that is not letting us bring up common sense legislation," he added.

He pointed out that in recent years, Congress couldn't even pass a bill that would prohibit people on the terrorist watch list from purchasing guns, let alone one that would keep assault weapons out of the hands of "irresponsible people."

"Maybe this will be the turning point. Maybe these students speaking out so boldly as they have on national TV, maybe the parents crying out and speaking so boldly as they have, maybe this will be the turning point because, in fact, enough is enough."

On Figure 3 the most significant a priori term is LIBERAL which was found at a special case skip against odds of about 283 to 1. It was at the same absolute skip as NICK CRUZ, SHOOTER, and OBAMA.  Figure 3 also adds the word for LEFT at skip +1. The terms for ABOMINATION and EACH MAN DYING FOR HIS OWN SIN were not included in the calculation because they were not sought a priori. Overall this matrix was found against odds of about 100,665,397 to 1.

PERSONAL THOUGHTS. As I note on Figure 3, a determined killer can use weapons besides guns to accomplish their plans. Of late we have seen many terrorist attacks brought about my Muslims using rented trucks or other vehicles to mow down pedestrians.  On 9-11 terrorists used box cutter knives to bring down the World Trade Center, 4 airliners and lethal damage at the Pentagon. We cannot outlaw trucks or murderous ingenuity.

       My son and I both own weapons. If there ary liberal readers out there, know for a certainly that we both bought our guns because Obama (and later Clinton) threatened gun ownership in this country. Had President Trump or almost any other Republican been in office, we would not have bought them. But I was disturbed at how easy it was for my son to buy an AR-15. He bought it against my wishes when he was about 21 years old. Not everyone at that age is fully mature. I felt like the knowledge that parents have of their children was seen as an irrelevant issue. Had my son had serious problems, I would have liked to have had veto power. Thankfully my son is fine, but not so for many other young men. I believe the age for purchase of an AR-15 or any similar weapon without parental consent for non-military personnel should be raised to 25.  It's also obvious that the FBI needs to do a better job on following up on tips and much less time (none, in fact) on looking for bogus connections between our President and the Russians.

EVEN A BROKEN CLOCK IS RIGHT TWICE PER DAY. Matrices 1, 2 and 3 cut right to the core of the problem. Although I can't stand CNN Announcer Don Lemmon because he is an anti-White bigot, he said the following: "Just because you can have a baby, it doesn't mean you should," Lemon said. "Especially without planning for one or getting married first. More than 72 percent of children in the African-American community are born out of wedlock. That means absent fathers. And the studies show that lack of a male role model is an express train right to prison and the cycle continues." Nick Cruz was not black, but the truth (really, the Commandment) that runs into his name at Exodus 22:21 is a fitting point to end this article on. YOU SHALL NOT AFFLICT THE FATHERLESS/ORPHAN.

       The high murder rate in black communities is due to the failure of young people there having babies to get married. Blacks can't blame whites for the decisions they make. It's worth noting that the Sign of the Covenant between God and Jews is embedded on the flesh of each Jew's sex organ via circumcision. The primary purpose of that organ is to draw souls down from Heaven and into the flesh. This implies not just a fleeting moment of pleasure, but an awesome responsibility and no small amount of work on the part of the father. If you start the jet engines and release the brakes on the airliner, you better have a mature pilot in the cockpit who can safely guide the plane to its destination. So too when a man impregnates a woman. An unguided child can be just as dangerous as a pilotless plane. Nick Cruz is just the latest example of what Torah warned is about.