REPORT CARD FOR JOHN BOLTON AND PRESIDENT TRUMP
This page posted on 9/12/2019.
On April 8, 2018 I posted my article about John Bolton. I am a Bolton fan, so when I heard he was fired or retired on September 10, 2019 I was sad to see him go, but based on how he behaved with the Venezuela/Maduro situation and his Libyan model for disarming North Korea, I wasn't surprised by it. What I'm going to do below is repost what I wrote in 2018, and then comment on lessons learned both with the Torah Code and with political actions taken over the last 17 months. Along the way I'll assign some report card grades for our President and for his now former National Security Advisor.
Figure 1 - John Bolton is encoded with war against (North) Korea, Iran and the Chinese, but has not succeeded in causing another war. Now that he's out of office it will be interesting to see if the President can safely improve relations with them. The spreadsheet for Figure 1 is given below.
MY 4/8/2018 ARTICLE: JOHN BOLTON, WAR AND KOREA - IS HE JUST BLUFFING?
He is strongly encoded with the word BLUFF, but it would still likely be a fatal mistake under underestimate him or our President.
I really wanted John Bolton to serve as President Trump's Secretary of State or Secretary of Defense. He is one of a handful of people in Washington now that I trust - the others being our President, our Vice President, and probably Secretary of Defense Mattis and Army Chief of Staff General Mark A. Milley. One advantage of his choice for National Security Advisor is that he doesn't have to be approved by the Senate which is run by traitors controlled by the Establishment. On Figure 1 the axis term is JOHN BOLTON (shown at the lowest skip and with a row split of 2). Kim Jong-un is terrified of him, and he has called him ugly. KIM touches JOHN BOLTON as do the CHINESE. Running vertically through CHINESE is one of four transliterations checked for KOREA. WAR is in the open text. All this is in only 180 letters against odds of about 98,261 to 1.When the matrix is expanded to 945 letters we pick up BLUFF at skip +1, PRESIDENT at skip +1 and an ELS of IRAN touching BLUFF. Although this devalues the terms discussed earlier, mostly on the back of the term BLUFF the full matrix is found against odds of about 577,377 to 1. The most significant term wasBLUFF which was found on the full matrix against odds of about 323 to 1. Note that because BLUFF touches IRAN, it may refer to Iran's threats being bluffs rather than Bolton's threats.
2019 REMARKS. Of the handful of people that I trusted General Mattis was a disappointment. His resignation is discussed here. With respect to grades, I'd would give the President an A (but not an A+). I think he should have settled the tariff issues with the Chinese before trying to disarm North Korea. Bolton was against the meetings with Kim Jung-un. Bolton correctly sensed that Kim could not be trusted and when the President got tough with China on trade the Chinese pressured Kim to stop playing ball with our President. Bolton's reservations about trusting Kim gets him an A- rating on this issue, but there is value obtained from the meetings so long as North Korea does not test any more nuclear weapons or ICBMs.
An Axios report in July suggested that, from Trump’s perspective, Bolton’s aggression was the main reason to keep him around. The matrix had WAR in the open text. Trump is said to have joked about Bolton’s bloodlust with foreign leaders, saying things like, “John has never seen a war he doesn’t like.” Such lines signaled that if people didn’t like Trump’s methods, they might have to deal with bad cop Bolton. Clearly, the encoded CHINESE and KIM in KOREA feared him. This was largely because of the mistake he made that played a role in getting him fired. On nuclear disarmament he said that he favored the Libyan model for North Korea. That model of the U.S. removing everything in Khadafy's nuclear program was eventually followed by Khadafy getting a bullet in his head - not exactly an attractive prospect for Kim Jung-un. Give Bolton a D or an F for his headwork on dealing with Kim on the how to disarm issue.
IRAN is also on Figure 1. We came within minutes of bombing them when the President called off the strike. In this sense Figure 1 gets an A because BLUFF touches IRAN. The President was seen as bluffing. Bolton's insistence on bombing was a point of contention with Trump. His name is not on the matrix, but PRESIDENT is at skip +1.
FIGURE 2 - JOHN BOLTON AND IRAN'S PRESIDENT ROUHANI
The only matrix that I could find linking JOHN BOLTON with Iran's President ROUHANI is shown on Figure 2. ROUHANI touches one word meaning ENEMY which is at the same skip as JOHN BOLTON. Rouhani liked to mock Bolton's mustache. MUSTACHE is touched by another word for ENEMY. I looked for SHIP because of late Iran is attacking and seizing oil tankers. Bolton came extremely close to getting his wish to bomb Iran fulfilled, but strangely what goes through Bolton's second name in the open text is I WILL NOT REJECT THEM OR DETEST THEM SO AS TO DESTROY THEM. If President Trump does not want to bomb Iran, Israel may have no choice but to do so, relying on American logistic support but without U.S. participation in the actual combat.
Figure 2 - John Bolton's desire to destroy Rouhani seems to be thwarted by Leviticus 26:44.
STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF FIGURE 2. On Figure 2 the axis term is the fifth lowest ELS of JOHN BOLTON. The most significant a priori term is ROUHANI which was found against odds of about 235 to 1 before factoring in the ELS rank of the axis term. One of two words for ENEMY was found on the matrix at a special case skip against odds of about 9 to 1, but this statistic overlooks the fact that it touches ROUHANI who Bolton's enemy. The Encoder used another easy to find word for ENEMY which had a 98% chance to be on the matrix, but this figure overlooks the fact that it touches an ELS of MUSTACHE. As can be seen on the hostile headline shown on Figure 2, Rouhani attacks Bolton by calling him "The Mustache." SHIP had about a 37% chance to be found. Overall, after dividing combined odds by 5 because of the ELS rank of the axis term, Figure 2 was found against odds of about 1,651 to 1.
Spreadsheet for Figure 2
FIGURE 3 - JOHN BOLTON DIDN'T LIKE IT, BUT TRUMP WANTS TO WITHDRAW FROM AFGHANISTAN. On Figure 3 the axis term is AFGHAN. WITHDRAWAL is at the same skip. A transliteration of TRUMP is at one skip less. PRESIDENT is at skip -1, and WAR is in the open text. If I had expanded the matrix down by 13 rows BIN LADEN would appear at the only ELS of +1 in Torah, but that takes the matrix up to a size that is too large. An expansion down would also have showed BOLTON, but it required the matrix size to exceed 1,000 letters in area which is my usual limit unless I am presenting an ELS map with a priori course angles shown.
Figure 3 - While Bolton did not favor withdrawal from Afghanistan, the Code backs the idea that he will get us out of there. He indicated his desire to do so in the 2019 State of the Union Address.
STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF FIGURE 3. On Figure 3 the axis term is AFGHAN. It's only six letters. The full Afghanistan is never found at an ELS in Torah. Because 6-letter terms occur at an ELS at a much higher frequency it is not uncommon to find a matrix with most of what we're looking for, but the higher the ELS rank of the axis term the higher the divisor gets to be and the lower the (quotient) significance will be. Here the divisor is 64 because that's the ELS rank of AFGHAN. On this matrix the most significant a priori term is WITHDRAWAL which is at the same skip as AFGHAN. I checked for three synonyms for WITHDRAWAL and found one of them against odds of about 127 to 1 before factoring in the ELS rank of the axis term. The transliteration of TRUMP is the second best one for his name, starting with a tav for the T rather than a rare tet. Using the frequency of the combined two spellings, I found one of them against odds of about 14 to 1. PRESIDENT is at a special case skip (-1) against odds of about 4.7 to 1. WAR is in the open text against odds of about 11 to 1. Although at first the matrix appears to be found against odds of about 94,840 to 1, after we divide by 64 to account for the axis term ELS rank, the final odds against finding this matrix are adjusted to about 1,481 to 1.
As far as grades go for all politicians when it comes to Afghanistan, I'd give them all an F. We went to war in Afghanistan in 2001 because Bin Laden attacked America. When we killed him we should have declared victory that day (after displaying his corpse), and gotten the hell out then. We will never change Afghan behavior and every American lost after we killed him is an incalculable loss taken for no valid reason. Yes, we need to monitor what is going on there, and yes there may be threats that merit an operation by special force teams briefly inserted into the country, but we shouldn't have thousands of troops stationed there that serve as perpetual targets for people who hate everything we stand for.
Spreadsheet for Figure 3.
