THE OBAMAS, THE WALL, AND THE COMING CIVIL WAR

       It took me two days to find it, but there is apparently a CIVIL WAR encoded. It will be caused by B. OBAMA (who is at skip -1) touching PRESIDENT, his wife MICHELLE (who is at skip +1 sharing a letter yud with the axis term) and the WALL (at the absolute skip of the axis term). SCHUMER also shares a letter resh with the axis term. Unlike most matrices that I find, this one may be viewed as actionable. There are legal sensitivities to this subject - especially with respect to how this war will likely be fought (target list, financial planning, etc.). The matrix shows the possibility that Michelle Obama will change her mind and run for President in 2020. She ranks relatively high for this in the Las Vegas odds shown on Figure 1, however it's not certain that if she wins the nomination she will also win the election. This matrix was found against odds of about 6,520,453 to 1 but be careful before betting the farm on this one. The Code may exist to facilitate Intelligence, but I see no evidence that its purpose is to aid gamblers.

       WILL MICHELLE OBAMA RUN FOR PRESIDENT IN 2020? Her last answer in October, 2018 was no, but Las Vegas isn't so sure. She ranks high on the list of potential winners. Here are the odds as of November 28, 2018 at Bovada. Note that she is twice as likely to win the election as Hillary Clinton is.

       After conducting a homosexual marriage, comedian Joan Rivers made an accusation on TV that  President Obama ia a homosexual, and Michelle Obama is transgender. Apparently the president on at least one occasion referred to his wife as Michael rather than Michelle. I did not take any of this seriously, but I was asked by a reader to see of there was anything encoded about it. The request came with a link to a video that purports Michelle to really be a Michael, with emphasis on the length of the fingers, ratio of height (5'11") to head size, presence of an Adam's Apple, and ratio of head to shoulder size, plus an apparent bulge where a woman should not have one. A few pictures looked like they might have been photo-shopped. The link is at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gvuulZPbfBg. While it will take far more than the matrix below to prove this sort of thing, I did find a matrix with MICHELLE OBAMA as the axis term. Her name was directly crossed in the open text by THE MEN WHO WERE WITH HIM.  At the same absolute skip as the name, but opposite direction, is HOMO. BARACK is at skip -1, and directly below it is PRESIDENT at skip +1. Odds against this matrix occurring by chance alone are about 36,804 to 1. While I don't think that Michelle's true sexual status is enough to start a civil war, the overall portrait of liberal leaders wanting to do away with our borders, discrimination against white men and mocking Biblical moral values might push the right past the breaking point. All it would take to light the fuse would be an impeachment that has a serious chance to succeed.

WOULD A NEW CIVIL WAR BE LIMITED IN SCOPE, OR LIKE THE ONE FROM 1861 to 1865? The first Civil War was easier to organize because there were clear state borders that marked vast areas of territory as being North or South. However what has evolved in recent times are political divisions that are based on population densities (see Figure 4). In just about all states urban areas are seemingly overwhelmed by liberal values and Democratic voters. Once you reach the rural areas values tend to shift to traditional religious ones that are best aligned with the Republican Party. It's hard to imagine rural fighters banding together to attack the cities, or cities going out to burn the farms that provide everyone with food. Therefore, it's more likely that attacks will largely focus on powerful individuals that play prominent roles in leading both sides (plus the Press and the mysterious Establishment).

       Marshall Law would be the Order of the Day. Such a war would one of mass assassinations. It's likely that the U.S. Capitol Building would have to close, or at least be a weapons-free zone that wouldn’t allow tourists to visit. Politicians would require massive security details to move about. President Trump has often bragged that he's not a politician. That may be wise, but it isn't believed by the Left. He does have the best of security, but 435 Representatives and 100 Senators and all our governors and mayors do not. It seems probable that when the carnage grows too prevalent, those in Congress will be forced to leave extreme positions and return to Centrist policies. If the war is not contained in the early days then we need to look at which political party is most armed (see Figure 5 - by far it's the Republicans) and which foreign nations might take advantage of the chaos to invade us. For starters, Mexico might want to try to take back lands that we conquered from them in the 1800’s, and Russia might try to take Alaska.

IF THERE WILL BE A CIVIL WAR, WHICH SIDE WOULD THE GUN OWNERS AND MILITARY SUPPORT? As is shown on Figure 5, by more than a 2 to 1 margin, gun owners in America are Republican. Likewise, by a similar margin, the military preferred Trump over Clinton in 2016. On May 9, 2016 the Military Times wrote the following:

In a new survey of American military personnel, Donald Trump emerged as active-duty service members' preference to become the next U.S. president, topping Hillary Clinton by more than a 2-to-1 margin. However, in the latest Military Times election survey, more than one in five troops said they’d rather not vote in November if they have to choose between just those two candidates.

But given only those choices, 21 percent of the service members surveyed said they would abstain from voting. More than 54 percent of the 951 troops Military Times surveyed said they would vote for Trump, the presumed Republican presidential nominee, over Clinton, the Democratic front-runner. Only about 25 percent said they would vote for Clinton in that matchup.

MILITARY ACTIONS AND THE U.S. CONSTITUTION. I served in the Naval Reserve for 10 years and the Coast Guard Reserve for 24 years. Of these about 15 years were on active duty. As such there were many times that I raised my right hand to swear allegiance to the Constitution. The U.S. is not Nazi Germany. The military there, of course, swore allegiance to their Führer - Hitler. However, if there is a Civil War while Trump is President, it's easy to use the excuse that the President is at the top of our military chain of command, and to therefore to follow all legal orders that he gives. Of interest here is that while I once wrote civil disobedience plans for the Coast Guard, they were all Unclassified (For Official Use Only). However the main plan I referenced (Garden Plot) was top secret. While I referred to it often, I only had a secret clearance, and I therefore never got a chance to read it. Our role wasn't much beyond protecting Coast Guard bases or providing water-borne transport - nothing sinister. However, Garden Plot plans are the source of widespread speculation on the Internet.

      A real question here is how our military should respond if there is a civil war that occurs in response to a Democrat in the White House. Here I will preference my remarks by confessing that over my lifetime, I have voted for the Republican candidate for president on 6 occasions (update: 7 times counting 2020), but I voted for the Democrat in six other national elections, including some when I was on active duty. Before Obama was elected I looked at the relative merits of each candidate. Obama marked a turning point. I read his book, Dreams of My Father, and I quickly came to realize that he was an anti-Semitic, white-hating Muslim Communist. When he was elected I thought, "Well, maybe we should give him a chance. Maybe he will improve relations between the races, and inspire young blacks to feel better about America." But it quickly became apparent that these hopes would be unfulfilled dreams. When he gave Iran $150,000,000,000 and entered into an accord that would guarantee Iran's ability to acquire unlimited nuclear weapons after 10 years, I knew that he was an enemy of the United States. If push comes to shove I would advise our military leaders to disobey any illegal orders from his wife if she is elected or from any other Communist-leaning Democrat like Bernie Sanders. What would constitute an illegal order? For starters, sending $1.7 billion in cash to Iran to help them fund terrorism.  Just think about it - the Democrats gave $151.7 billion to Iran, but won't spend $5 billion to build a wall needed for our security.

       The Obamas and their liberal cohorts have either been so out of touch with reality, or so treasonous that I have often wondered about the possibility that they are brainwashed, implanted, or suffering from a virus. The latter possibility is covered in my article entitled An Alien Virus May Explain Mass Political Stupidity. There is a so called stupidity virus - ATCV-1. Taken to an extreme, fighting such people calls to mind something out of a Zombie Apocalypse-type movie.

WHY IS THE WALL WORTH FIGHTING FOR? WOULD OTHER SECURITY MEASURES BE MORE EFFECTIVE AT A LOWER PRICE? The wall is needed to preserve our sovereignty. Devices like drones, radar or the use of more border guards all become effective, if at all, only in finding people who cross our border. Once they are here they can game our legal system. We need the wall to bring this gaming to an end. Nothing else, short of bombing them as they approach our border, will work. But reality is that it's not just illegal aliens who want to game our system. They are the servants of the Democrat Party. How so and why? Because once these people get in they may manage to vote. In fact, Democrats are working hard to make that happen - something backed by 54% of Democrat voters. When they do they tend to back the Democrats who helped to get them across the border, even if they are criminals who were deported before. Democrats welcome them with open arms in sanctuary cities and states - even when it means that real Americans wind up getting raped, robbed, or murdered. It's this disregard for security that breeds hatred in true Conservatives towards the liberals - pushing us ever closer to a civil war. That should be easy to understand for Democrats, but judging by the 2018 results in the House of Representatives - it's over their heads. And so, when Nancy Pelosi became Speaker of the House on January 2, 2019 - she became second in line (behind Vice President Pence) to become President of the United States if something bad happens to our President. If the President is impeached and convicted, Pelosi moves up to a heart beat away from the Presidency. God help us.

     Pelosi has said that, "Walls are immoral." But without them there would be no real limit to the world's poor rushing our borders. America would quickly vanish as a nation. The threat in Figure 1 is clear enough. Our military must understand the existential threat that liberals back at their own peril. Until or unless reason returns to the Democrat Party, our military leaders must be alert to this danger. Our pledge is to defend our nation against all threats, foreign and domestic. Our military needs to plan for and be prepared for the day it becomes clear that a domestic enemy has taken over or is about to take control of our nation - and they need to help us take it back.

RECOMMENDATION FOR ALL - READ LIBERTY'S LAST STAND BY STEPHEN COONTS.  When President Trump summoned Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi to the White House on December 11, 2018 to discuss the need for a wall in front of live cameras (that the Democrats protested), he mentioned that recently ten terrorists were caught crossing the border. In refusing to fund the wall, Democrats are encouraging terrorists to attack. One of the best novels that I've read in recent years deals with exactly this threat. It is LIBERTY'S LAST STAND by Stephen Coonts (2016). The book should be required reading for all military planners (really, for all patriotic Americans). Publisher's Weekly sums up the work as follows:

President Barry Soetoro, the villain of bestseller Coonts's provocative thriller, is due to leave office in five months when he uses a convenient terrorist attack to declare martial law, adjourn Congress, suspend the Constitution and the Bill of Rights (especially the first and second amendments), and become the dictator of the United States. He fires CIA director Jake Grafton and throws him in a federal detention center in West Virginia along with hundreds of conservative politicians and political commentators. Grafton's ex-CIA pal, decides he's going to bust his old boss out of jail. Meanwhile, Texas secedes from the union and begins seizing U.S. military bases. Soetoro's opponents have a long list of gripes: he's a "self-proclaimed black messiah," "Soetorocare" is a disaster, and EPA regulations are "designed to save the climate at the expense of the working men and women of Texas." Coonts's excellent action scenes, which shift between Tommy's jailbreak scheme and the civil war with Texas, grind to a halt as characters stop to give fervent speeches about freedom. Those who don't care for Obama or his policies will find a lot to like.

       What didn't the above summary tell us? Actually, it amazes me that so few people in America know this. When Obama lived in Indonesia his legal name was Barry Soetoro. Maybe you thought that the Obama years are behind us. But waiting in the wings to restore power to the greatest enemies of America is Michelle Obama, which is why I was so astounded when I saw MICHELLE at skip +1 (best case scenario) cross and share a letter with CIVIL of CIVIL WAR. The warning could not be clearer. MICHELLE at skip +1 six times in the 304,805 letters of Torah. Without considering conflicting letters, the odds against MICHELLE at skip +1 being in 6 rows by 4 columns with the axis term are about 2,117 to 1. This message is not a fluke. It is exactly the kind of intelligence that I have been seeking for years to present to DoD.

       Is DoD getting the message? In checking my traffic today I see from midnight (MST) up to 20:32 MST there were 21 hits by DoD at Fort Huachuca, 6 hits by other DoD sites, and 23 hits by Level-3 Communications - who work for DoD and who track everything that I write about moving signals back in time. That's 50 hits so far today out of the 82 people who read this article. So the answer is yes, DoD is getting the message. But the decision of what do about it is beyond my pay grade.  Although there are likely more DoD readers among the 32 people not initially classified as DoD or Level-3, there are other patriotic Americans who want to plan for what's coming. My best regards to all of you. There is a storm coming.  Be ready.

STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF FIGURE 1. As per my standard protocol, no statistical significance is assigned to the axis term, here CIVIL at its 169th lowest skip ELS in wrapped Torah. Normally such a rank for a 6-letter word would not qualify for a spot on my site, but there really was a secondardy requirement attached here that isn't in my standard bag of protocol tricks. I required a really close match with WAR in the open text. The split was necessary to gain insight into civil wars because the full term CIVIL WAR doesn't occur in the Codes at any ELS. The closest matches of the two words require 30 letters - 6 rows for CIVIL as axis term and 5 columns to display WAR in the open text. There were a few matches with 30 letters, but I didn't find enough of interest with respect to the current crisis. I could get SCHUMER at the same same skip as the axis term, but not much more at special case skips of +/- 1 or the absolute skip of the axis term. So I expanded the search slightly and found that there was an extraordinary story waiting with 6 rows for CIVIL as axis term and 7 columns to display WAR in the open text for a total area of 42 letters. This  base also included the word ARMY just before WAR, but that didn't make it onto the probability calculation because it was only found a posteriori.

        I had to make a decision about how to rank the axis term. The rank of 169 pays no attention to the requirement for WAR close by in the open text. One possibility was to starting ranking with the smallest 30-letter matches, but this was an obvious great departure from my normal protocol. So, despite the high ELS rank that would at the end require me to divide combined significance of terms by 169, for purposes of consistency I went with standard protocol. As such the first term of statistical interest then became B. OBAMA (at skip -1). There were no other special case skips of this term in Torah, so the odds against finding it were about 1,303 to 1 before considering axis term ELS rank. On the full 234-letter matrix MICHELLE is at skip +1 against odds of about 217 to 1. That allows no value for the fact that she crosses and shares a letter yud with the axis term, however as noted earlier odds against that were about 2,117 to 1. When I discovered her name where I found it I knew that I had found what I wanted, and I immediately published the matrix and sent out alerts. While it was a requirement, the calculation adds no value for CIVIL as axis term, but it requires a frequency check and calculation for WAR in the open text. It is only the full matrix against odds of about 36 to 1. WALL is at a special case skip against odds of about 13.5 to 1. What remains are two words not at a special case skip - PRESIDENT and SCHUMER. Overlooking the fact that PRESIDENT touches B. OBAMA and SCHUMER shares a letter resh with CIVIL, PRESIDENT had about a 32.5% chance to be on the matrix. For it was about a 39.2% chance. Overall, after dividing combined odds against the matrix (1,101,956,702) by 169 (the ELS rank of CIVIL), the matrix was found against combined odds of about 6,520,453 to 1.