GAY SCOUT LEADERS - NOT ACCORDING TO TORAH!

On June 12, 2013, the Boy Scouts decided to allow homosexuals into their organization.  About 70% of Boy Scout troops are directly supported by or chartered by churches. All of them include the Torah in their canon. Two specific verses in Leviticus directly oppose homosexuality. The more severe of them, Leviticus 20:13 is shown in Figure 1 which has as its axis term AND THE BOY SCOUTS. Leviticus 20:13 is on the top line, which reads (A MAN WHO) LIES WITH A MAN AS ONE WHO LIES WITH A WOMAN, AN ABOMINATION THEY HAVE DONE. THEY SHALL BOTH DIE. There are much better matches between the axis term and the prohibitions against homosexuality. But this matrix has two lines that very much justify the expansion needed to see the prohibition. A transliteration of B. OBAMA appears on the matrix a skip -1. This is the only time in Torah that the name appears at an absolute skip of 1. More astounding is that on the line below B. OBAMA and touching it is PRESIDENT, also at skip -1. But there is more. In direct sequence with PRESIDENT at skip -1 is THE IMPOSTER. For those who believe that this President was born in Mombasa, Kenya, and not Hawaii, the meaning is clear. Obama, having been born in Kenya, is an imposter. An ELS of KENYA shares a letter hey with THE IMPOSTER.

       In addition to the story how Sodom and Gomorrah were destroyed for homosexual behavior/attempted rape (Genesis 19:5), there are two verses in the Torah that specifically ban homosexual behavior The first is Leviticus 18:22, which states, “You shall not lie with a man as one lies with a woman, it is abomination.” Leviticus 20:13 is stronger.  It states, “A man who lies with a man as one lies with a woman, they have both done an abomination; they shall be put to death, their blood is upon themselves.” Figures 1 and 2 include the stronger prohibition, but Figure 2 has HE IS A MURDERER go directly through THE BOY SCOUTS. The positioning of the latter phrase raises a question, in light of Leviticus 20:13, as to whether there is any guilt to be placed on the young victim of a homosexual rape. The immediate obvious answer, assuming that this matrix is not just due to chance, is “no.” This murderer being referred to must be the adult who has forced himself on the boy.

       In what sense should homosexual rape be seen as equivalent to murder? Several arguments are possible. First, if the rapist transmits AIDS, it may kill the boy. Second, the rape may so disturb the scout as to lead the boy to commit suicide. Third, the rape may warp the sexual development of the scout, leading him into a life of sexual deviancy that may harm future children. Finally, if the incident leads to an AIDS infection, the disease may spread to the scout’s future wife  (or girlfriend), killing her or her children. Thus it must be assumed that any homosexual rape is attempted murder on a grand scale. This does not mean that every scout leader who is gay will attempt to rape his scouts, but there is no critical reason for why a man must be a scout leader, whereas there is a critical reason for why boys must be protected from such scout leaders, priests, or any other homosexual man who is in a position to impose his sexual needs on young boys.

With regard to where Scout packs are found in the U.S., it is well known that the religion with the greatest threat of homosexual rape is the Catholic Church, which has thousands of cases of boys raped by pedophile priests. Catholic parents must be especially careful, because according to 2010 year-end Boy Scouts of America membership information, the Catholic Church in the U.S. has

• 180,286 Cub Scouts in 4,292 packs
• 97,625 Boy Scouts in 3,684 troops
• 8,822 Venturers in 819 crews.

Even as I write this on February 7, 2013, I am watching a PBS special and reading their story today entitled Tale of Abuse in Los Angeles Archdiocese All Too Familiar for Catholic Church. It really isn’t news; it’s what we hear it seems in another city every month. The answer to the Catholic problem is not therapy and transfer of problem priests to new areas where they can continue their abuse. The answer is for the Catholic Church not only to ban or fire homosexual priests, but to change its doctrine to require priests to be married. Catholics also need a pope who never wore a Nazi uniform. Meanwhile, the abundant problem caused by homosexual priests in the Catholic Church provides all the evidence required that homosexuals should not have role in running Boy Scout Organizations. Where errors may be made, it is always best to error on the side of child safety rather than Obama's insane, but politically correct way of corrupting America.