FOX NEWS AND TORAH DISCUSS: IS OBAMA OUR ENEMY?
As with his parting from Reverand Wright, when Obama does take action, it's only based on his political needs. Updated 9/14/2014
On September 4, 2014 Bill O’Reilly, a Fox News talk show host, had as his guest another Fox News commentator, Andrea Tantaros. The show was about whether President Obama could be seen as an enemy of the United States. The essential 2 minute 35 second section of the show may (and should) be watched here. At about 32 seconds into the interview Tantaros states that, "Obama has a world view that is very anti-American." This certainly sounds like she is saying Obama is our enemy. At around 54 seconds O'Reilley asks her if she buys into the hard right view that President Obama wants to harm America. At first she answers, "No." Of course, she knows that if she says "yes" she will be branded as a racist, a nut, and will likely be fired - fast. But after her initial answer she goes on to say of Obama that, "he is unable to protect the West because he has distain for the West. So, I put the question of Obama to the Torah Code. Does it see Obama as our enemy? Figure 1 seems to answer that question with a resounding YES.
Figure 1 above. The axis term is OUR ENEMY. OBAMA is found at the same absolute skip. QATAR at skip +1 touches OBAMA.
On Figure 1 the 9-letter axis term is OUR ENEMY. Four of its 9 letters shown with yellow form the word pronounced nasi. It means PRESIDENT. But maybe it’s just a coincidence, because not every President is our enemy. We need to know which President is our enemy. When I research a matrix about Obama, I like to see his name come up (with standard spelling used in the press) at the absolute skip of the axis term. Bingo. OUR ENEMY is at skip -24,196 in wrapped Torah (which requires more than one computer pass for CodeFinder software to see) and OBAMA is at skip 24,196. Obama’s first name, BARACK, is found at the special case skip of -1. It starts inside OBAMA at the letter bet in his name.
What is astounding, but only found a-posteriori (and therefore not subject to a statistical analysis later), is the fact that BARACK is found in the open text verse that warns Jews about a false prophet. The verse says, “If there arises in the midst of you a prophet, or a dreamer of dreams--and he gives you a sign or a wonder.” There is a disagreement between various translations as to whether the verse is Deuteronomy 13:1 or 13:2, but it the 13th chapter of Deuteronomy has Moses tells the Jews that even if the prophet” can make accurate predictions via his dreams, or do wonders, we should not follow him if he asks us to go after gods that we have not known. We should not fear him. Capital punishment was the solution. This instruction is basically repeated in the 18th chapter of Deuteronomy. As will be discussed later, on a Christian web site, retired U.S. Air Force Lt. General Thomas McInerney and retired U.S. Army General Paul Vallely came very close to calling for that when they implied that the solution to Obama might be "an Act of God" (Jewish readers will want to skip introductory remarks that proselytize Christian theology - the interview is of great interest once the generals start to speak).
Many people in the hard right (and many in the more moderate right) think Obama was born in Kenya. I discuss this and present evidence to support this allegation elsewhere on my site at Obama Birth, but here I just checked to see if KENYA was on the matrix. It is, but not at a special case skip (+/- 1 or the absolute skip of the term). I noticed that a transliteration of the nation of QATAR is at a special case skip of +1, touching and immediately above OBAMA. QATAR a primary source of funding for the terrorist group Hamas that Israel has fought again in the summer of 2014. In fairness to Qatar, it is also home to a U.S. military base. But a lot of the money it gets from America (and from oil) goes to pay for Hamas, its rockets, and Gaza.
STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF THE FIGURE 1. As per my standard protocol, no statistical significance is assigned to the axis term, here OUR ENEMY (THE ENEMY OF US) at its lowest skip in wrapped Torah. The a-priori key word of greatest significance is obviously OBAMA at same absolute skip of OUR ENEMY. Sometimes it is argued that statistics can be used to prove anything. That's true when experimental protocols are either not specified or dishonestly applied. So let me be very specific about how the figures obtained on the spreadsheet were derived, where they are subject to debate and where they are more conservative than the apparent beauty of this matrix really deserves. With OBAMA the spelling shown (alef vav bet mem hey) is the spelling used in the Israeli press. It is therefore the preferred spelling. It is always the first spelling that I seek for him. When I find it on a matrix, it is the only spelling that I use when checking on frequency of the name at the skips of interest. It is never found in Torah at special case skips +/- 1, and therefore when it appears at a special case skip, it must be at the absolute skip of the axis term. Here OUR ENEMY is at skip -24,196 and OBAMA is at skip +24,196. So they are parallel to each other, but they run in the opposite direction. At skip +24,196 OBAMA is found once in (wrapped) Torah where the computer makes more than one pass through the 304,805 letters in Torah (but never in unwrapped Torah with a single pass) and 4 times at skip -24,196 in wrapped Torah (but only twice in unwrapped Torah). I work with wrapped Torah, so I use a combined frequency of 5 (1+4) on my spreadsheet, and that results in finding the special case skip of the President's name against odds of about 241 to 1 on a 253-letter matrix.
There is an alternate transliteration for OBAMA that I sometimes show on matrices about him. It is (alef vav bet mem alef), but when I use it I also use the frequency for both spellings at special case skip and add 1 because once this spelling is found at the special case skip of -1. When it is found at that skip the Hebrew letter before it is always bet, therefore it appears as B. OBAMA. If I had used both spellings on the spreadsheet, then the combined frequency would have been 8, and the odds against the President's name being there would have been altered from about 241 to 1 down to about 151 to 1. So using both spellings automatically means reducing the significance of the find. Having spelled out my protocol, I feel justified in using the more significant odds here. However I opt for a very conservative protocol with the a-priori key word PRESIDENT.
Obviously there is an intrinsic beauty in having PRESIDENT be found inside the axis term OUR ENEMY. I didn't realize it would be there until I had CodeFinder software search for it and it appeared there on my computer screen. But, on realizing that whether by coincidence or design, it would always be in the axis term I also realized that it is at twice the absolute skip of the axis term (thus its letters appear on every other line). This is not a special case skip, which means that it gets no special weight, and its frequency is subject to the Roffman Skip Formula and Skip Tables. That leads to a high frequency of 301, but even here I am more conservative than my standard protocol allows for. This is because when I usually see the word on a matrix, it is at skip +1. The words also means PRINCE or CHIEF, and in the open text it usually is used in conjunction with the leaders of the tribes of Israel. It occurs 68 times at skip +1 in Torah, so I add that to the 301 figure to attain a frequency 369. With this frequency it appears somewhere on the 253-letter matrix against odds of about 3.8 to 1.
BARACK, is found at the special case skip of -1. It starts inside OBAMA at the letter bet in his name, but I do not assign extra statistical value to that, so I can say that it appears at a special case skip against odds of about 4 to 1. KENYA appeared at a non-special case against odds of about 5.7 to 1, however it is obvious that it is debatable as to whether it is a proper a-priori word. It is if in fact Obama was born in Mombasa. but it is not if he was born in Hawaii. Birth certificates exist to support both contentions.
Finally, QATAR is at a special case skip of +1, but it was not found a-priori, and therefore no odds are quoted for it. The same is true for the warning about a false prophet (which perhaps suggests man who occupies the White House illegally if he was indeed born in Kenya). Overall, the combined odds against finding the matrix are computed as 22,039 to 1. However, it is important to remember that these odds only reflect what I was able to correctly guess would be found close to the axis term. They completey overlook the fact that the Author may have had much more in mind when He created the Torah. Thus what I disregard because they were only found by me in an a-posteriori manner may in fact have been key points in the original encoding process. While there are two possible spellings for QATAR, there is a definite link between it, the U.S. Government, and terrorism. When John Kerry wanted to negotiate with Hamas to end the war in Gaza in the summer of 2014, he had to go to QATAR to do so, and they directly fund Hamas. So when QATAR touches OBAMA, we should not overlook that fact.
Figure 2 below - The axis term is OBAMA IS HAMAS. The word ISLAM is encoded through and shares a letter samech with HAMAS.
STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF THE FIGURE 2. Again, as per my standard protocol, no statistical significance is assigned to the axis term, here OBAMA (is) HAMAS at its only ELS in wrapped Torah. The word is is never written in Hebrew. It is implied and included on a translation where appropriate. One a-priori word, shown in the part of the matrix with the blue background (189-letter area) is quite significant - ISLAM. It appeared on the 189-letter matrix against odds of about 231 to 1. HUMA is also there, touching OBAMA. However she had a better than even chance of being on that part of the matrix, though the chance of her being so close to OBAMA (in a 50-letter box) was about 1 in 20 if we do not consider the issue of conflicting letters in the two names (which means that it was a little more significant in getting her name so close to him). On the full matrix (1,275 letters) HUMA was virtually certain to be there due to the common letters in her name. ISLAM had about 1 chance in 9 to be on the full matrix. We pick up QATAR art skip +1, but that find it had about 1 chance in 4.6 to be there, so it wasn't worth the decrease in significance of ISLAM to pick up this term. BROTHERHOOD had about 1 chance in 2 to be on the large matrix. So it also wasn’t worth the expansion. Overall, the part of the matrix with the blue background was found against odds of about 403 to 1, but the full matrix was only found against odds of about 168 to 1. The matrices on Figure 2 represent a shifting of focus to the left from what was shown elsewhere on my site about the same axis term. That matrix starts with OBAMA (is) HAMAS and work only the right of it.
THE OBAMA - MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD CONNECTION. This article is being expanded with great reference to a short booklet entitled The Muslim Brotherhood in the Obama Administration (2012) by David Horowitz. One of the people to be discussed is Huma Abedin. HUMA is shown encoded next to OBAMA IS HAMAS below on Figure 2. Five U.S. House Representatives (Michelle Bachmann, Trent Franks, Louie Gohmert, Tom Rooney and Lynn Westmoreland) asked five federal inspectors to determine if people affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood were using their access to the Obama Administration to influence its policies toward the Brotherhood (especially in Egypt) and the Islamist agenda in this country and elsewhere. The five members of Congress were primarily worried about Huma Abedin, although her family is also strongly tied to the Muslim Brotherhood (Ilhwan in Arabic). Horowitz gives a long account of her and her family, but after showing how organizations she was associated were linked to terrorism, he states:
During her time as a student at George Washington University in the late 1990s, she was on the Executive Board of the school’s chapter of the Muslim Students Association. The MSA was the original Brotherhood front in the United States, according to documents captured by the FBI. Furthermore, Huma was listed from 1996 to 2008 as an Assistant Editor of the journal published by her mother‘s Institute of Muslim Minority Affairs (IMMA). Her name appeared for seven of those years alongside that of Abdullah Omar Naseef, the Brotherhood’s (and al Qaeda’s) financier who served on the IMMA Advisory Editorial Board from 1979 until 2003, when his name was finally removed after he was designated by the U.S. government as a sponsor of terrorism. It was during these years when she was publicly associated with a Muslim Brotherhood-sponsored front that Huma first worked as an intern and then as a paid staffer in the Clinton White House where she was assigned to the First Lady’s office. She subsequently became a “senior advisor” to Mrs. Clinton during her Senate tenure and served as a “traveling chief of staff” to Candidate Hillary Clinton during the 2008 presidential campaign.
Her duties involved much more than ensuring that the candidate was well groomed and on time. During the 2008 campaign, the New York Observer published a profile of Huma Abedin describing her as “a trusted advisor to Mrs. Clinton, especially on issues pertaining to the Middle East, according to a number of Clinton associates. At meetings on the region, they say, Ms. Abedin’s perspective is always sought out.” Huma Abedin was appointed to the position of Deputy Chief of Staff for the Secretary of State when Mrs. Clinton joined the Obama administration in 2009. Her name was removed from the Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs about that time. Secretary Clinton made a point of visiting Huma’s mother, Saleha, at her university in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia in 2010. In a public comment on that occasion, Clinton praised her aide and described Huma’s position as “very important and sensitive.”
Security Matters:
Raising the question of whether a person with Huma Abedin’s familial and personal associations with fronts of the Muslim Brotherhood is, given the crucial position she now occupies, both legitimate and necessary —as much as it was to raise the question of Soviet agent Alger Hiss’s presence at Yalta in 1944 as part of President Roosevelt’s foreign policy staff, although those inquiries, too, were defamed by the liberal establishment of the 1950s as “McCarthyism,” the Cold War equivalent in terms of invoking cloture on sensitive security issues of today’s “Islamophobia.” In an August 8, 2012 speech at the National Press Club, former Chief Assistant U.S. Attorney Andrew McCarthy observed: Access to classified information is a privilege, not a right. You need not have done anything wrong to be deemed unfit for these privileges. It is not a question of your patriotism or your trustworthiness. It is about whether you would be burdened by such obvious conflicts of interest that you would be tempted to act on those interests, rather than in the best interests of the United States.... It is about whether there’s a reasonable chance you could be compromised — not whether you have been compromised. The question of whether this standard has been applied in the case Huma Abedin is what the five members of the House of Representatives sought to have clarified by the State Department Inspector General. To date, no answers have been forthcoming, although they are needed now more than ever in light of deeply problematic policies touching upon the Muslim Brotherhood which have been adopted at the State Department under Hillary Clinton:
2010: Secretary Clinton approves a visa for the Muslim Brotherhood chief theorist Tariq Ramadan.
2010: State Department officials begin “engaging” with Muslim Brotherhood representatives shortly before the “Arab Spring.”
2011: State Department official trains Muslim Brotherhood operatives on how to win elections as part of a course in “democracy theories” following
the fall of Hosni Mubarak.
2011: The State Department collaborates with the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, a bloc of governments heavily influenced by the Brotherhood, in seeking to restrict American free-speech rights in deference to Sharia prohibitions against the critical examination of Islam.
2011: The State Department declares that the Obama administration would be “satisfied” with the election of a Muslim Brotherhood–dominated government in Egypt.
2011: Secretary Clinton announces establishment of formal relations with the Muslim Brotherhood.
2011: The State Department excludes Israel, the world’s leading target of terrorism, from its “Global Counterterrorism Forum.” At the forum’s
kickoff, Secretary Clinton decries various terrorist attacks and terrorist groups; but she does not mention Muslim Brotherhood franchise Hamas or its
attacks against Israel.
2011: Secretary Clinton advances the Islamists’ in International efforts to curb any expression that offends Islam by defining this not as a suppression of free speech, but merely an effort to curb “incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence.”
2012: Secretary Clinton waives congressional restrictions to transfer $1.5 billion to the Egyptian government after an Islamist-dominated parliament is installed on eve of the election of a Muslim Brotherhood president.
2012: The State Department and the administration host a contingent from Egypt’s newly elected parliament that includes not only Muslim Brotherhood members but a member of the Islamic Group (al-Gama’at al Islamiyya), a jihadist organization headed by the Blind Sheikh (Omar Abdel Rahman), who is serving a life sentence for his leading role in a terrorist campaign against the United States in the early Nineties. Like Hamas, the Islamic Group is designated as a terrorist organization to which it is illegal to provide material support.
2012: Specifically, the State Department authorizes a visa for known terrorist Hani Nour Eldin to open negotiations on the release of the Blind Sheikh; DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano informs Congress that the State Department should be expected to issue more such visas to individuals like Eldin who may have been terrorists but have now joined “the political process” in their native lands.
2012: During a trip to Egypt in July, Secretary Clinton pressures the ruling military junta to hand over power to the newly elected parliament, which is dominated by the Muslim Brotherhood, and to the newly elected president, Mohamed Morsi, who has long been a top Brotherhood official. Secretary Clinton later meets with Morsi, who has also been extended the honor of an invitation to visit the White House in September. All this despite the Muslim Brotherhood’s extensive record of hostility toward the United States, and despite the fact that Morsi, in his first public statement after being elected president, announced that one of his top priorities is to pressure the United States for the release of the Blind Sheikh.
Obviously, when Morsi was overthrown after the Egyptian people got sick of the Muslim Brotherhood burning churches and driving away tourists, the Obama Administration fought hard to reinstate him. His successor, General Al-Sisi was wise to outlaw the Muslim Brotherhood and throw its members into prison. Today President Al-Sisi is a much better friend to Israel than Obama, Clinton or Kerry.
The other people associated with both the Muslim Brotherhood and Obama that author David Horowitz discusses in his booklet are Deputy White House Counsel Rashad Hussain, Suhail Khan, Dalia Mogahed, John Esposito, Pradeep Ramamurthy, and Mohamed Magid. The links just given may not be the best. I suggest that those interested should read the short booklet by Horowitz. Contact and purchase information is as follows:
The Muslim brotherhood in the Obama Administration
Copyright 2012
David Horowitz Freedom Center
PO BOX 55089
Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964
Elizabeth@horowitzfreedomcenter.org
ISBN: 1-886442-92-4
Printed in the United States
$3.00 Each; $1.00 each for orders of 25 or more
Imam Barack Hussein Obama Issues A Fatwa Declaring That The Islamic State In Iraq And Syria (ISIS) Is Not Islamic. Obviously, Obama's claim that religions do not harm innocents is not matches by the history Islam, Christianty, or even ancient Judaism, although the Israelites ran into trouble with God when they failed to carry out instructions from Him to kill all the inhabitants in areas of Israel.
We have never seen any documented proof that Reverend Wright (famous for damning America) converted Obama from Islam (listed as his faith on his school registration in Indonesia) to Christianity, but what gives Obama the ability to define who is Islamic and who is not? It isn't up to him to make the call. ISIS is not a freak exception to Islam. In the Qur'an (8:12-13) and 47:4 Mohammed endorsed beheading people and terrorizing them. I wanted to copy the list of all Islamic terrorist organizations here, but it's far too long - so I will just include a link to these groups as found in Wikipedia (note: the list needs updating and a few organizations on the list are not Islamic).
The main things to understand about Obama's September 10, 2014 speech are that it started with the two lies discussed above, that he points to Somalia and Yemen as examples of what success looks like, that he only made the speech when his approval rating dropped to 38%. and that contrary to normal "boilerplate" presidential speechs that emphasize "all options are on the table," Obama assures our enemy that there will be "no boots on the ground" to actually fight the estimated 31,500 ISIS fighters there now.
Wars cannot be won from the air alone (unless nuclear weapons are dropped). One thing that ISIS might understand: Stop pussyfooting with terrorists held at Guantanamo. Try them, and sentence them to death if found guilty. Then issue a declaration that for each Westerner beheaded, a Gitmo convict will also be executed by the U.S. military. Use beheading. When the executions are complete, make sure that ISIS gets the video. This is the only language that they will understand. In Obama's words, this is a way that he can "manage" the ISIS problem. He will not manage it by recruiting other Arab states to fight. He only has to look to the Iraqi Army to understand that they are not reliable.
