CODE INDICATES DEMOGRAPHIC PROBLEMS FOR U.S. ELECTIONS

This article examines what the Torah Code reveals about how demographics affect American elections and how lack of attention to them may threaten our existence. The Figure 1 axis term is DEMOGRAPHIC. At the same absolute skip are USA and a short transliteration for TRUMP. In the open text crossing DEMOGRAPHIC and USA is Leviticus 26:33 - and you will I SCATTER AMONG THE NATIONS, ... and YOUR LAND SHALL BE A DESOLATION, AND YOUR CITIES shall be a waste. Also in the open text is WAR and at skip +1 is IMMIGATE. WALL is at skip -1. That's what we need to secure our borders. OBAMA is found at one skip above that of the axis term and RACE is at the same skip as OBAMA. There is a word for WOMEN at skip +1, but it's part of a bigger word for PEOPLE. Figure 1 was found against odds if at least 429 million to 1. In Figure 4 we look at ACTIVE MISSIONS, Soviet bloc/Russian operations based around fake news. Although it was originally a disinformation plan (Operation Infektion) blaming the U.S. for AIDS, Putin ran similar campaigns while in the KGB and he apparently still runs such programs to sow divisions among the races in the U.S., especially with regards to our elections. Figure 4 relates it to the 2016 election.

HOW ARE DEMOCRATS DIFFERENT FROM REPUBLICANS? Let's look at some issues raised by the Washington Post.

1. AGE. On the graph on Figure 1 we find that the younger voters are, the more likely they are to be Democrats. About 67% of those in the 18 to 39 age group voted for the Democrat. For those in the 40 to 49 age group it was about 58%. For 50 to 64 it was down to about 51%. Finally, only about 46% of those who are 65 or older voted for the Democrats. Thus the more mature a voter is the more likely that he or she will be to vote Republican. However while older voters are likely to remember how poorly Communists have done in running nations and economies, or in guaranteeing human rights, many or most younger voters have no idea of what life was and is like in Cuba, or in Venezuela, or China - especially during the Tiananmen Square Massacre in 1989. We might hope that college students will learn some history except there is mild to severe criticism of any professor who is not a liberal. Thus many of America's youth are totally ignorant when it comes to history. So the news here is that the wise folks will likely die out much faster than the ignorant. The (corrupt) Establishment probably banks on the idea that if they wait long enough, they can count on those in the know dying out before the younger people (who seem to be willing to behave like sheep being lead to the slaughter).

2. HOME - LARGELY URBAN AND SUBURBAN FOR DEMOCRATS, RURAL FOR REPUBLICANS. See Figures 2A and 3. With respect to urban voters, The Washington Post writes:

The political divide between rural and urban America is more cultural than it is economic, rooted in rural residents’ deep misgivings about the nation’s rapidly changing demographics, their sense that Christianity is under siege and their perception that the federal government caters most to the needs of people in big cities, according to a wide-ranging poll that examines cultural attitudes across the United States.

The Washington Post-Kaiser Family Foundation survey of nearly 1,700 Americans — including more than 1,000 adults living in rural areas and small towns — finds deep-seated kinship in rural America, coupled with a stark sense of estrangement from people who live in urban areas. Nearly 7 in 10 rural residents say their values differ from those of people who live in big cities, including about 4 in 10 who say their values are “very different.”

The article continues:

The results highlight the growing political divisions between rural and urban Americans. While urban counties favored Hillary Clinton by 32 percentage points in the 2016 election, rural and small-town voters backed Trump by a 26-point margin, significantly wider than GOP nominee Mitt Romney’s 16 points four years earlier.

During election coverage in 2018 I noticed that when liberal news commentators discussed rural voters they tended to exercise noticeable care that they not dismiss rural voters as "country bumpkins." While Democrats appear to look down on farmers who feed them, they are quite anxious to ensure that non citizens vote. FoxNews.Com reports:

Lawyers for the Florida Democratic gubernatorial and Senate candidates objected Friday to the rejection of a provisional ballot cast by a noncitizen, according to a transcript obtained by Fox News.

The incident occurred during a canvassing meeting Friday in Palm Beach County, where provisional ballots were being examined. According to the draft transcript of the meeting, taken by a court reporter hired by the Florida Republican Party, a provisional ballot was ordered excluded from the count, as it came from a non-U.S. citizen.

“First one of these we’ve seen,” said Judge August Bonativa.

“Not a U.S. citizen, not counted.” said Supervisor of Elections Susan Bucher, according to the transcript.

It was at this point where lawyers representing Democratic gubernatorial candidate Andrew Gillum and Sen. Bill Nelson, D-Fla., issued objections -- although they did not give reasons for those objections. The objections were noted, but the vote was still not counted.

3. GENDER - WOMEN ARE FOR THE DEMOCRATS, (REAL) MEN ARE REPUBLICANS. See Figure 2B. It is more common for men to have the courage to fight in a war than for women to do so. Note that on Figure 2C from 2008 through 2018 the ups and downs of support of the Democratic Party by women and men follow a similar pattern, but women were always voting more for the militarily weak Democrat Party. In past times women married younger than they do today and likely voted the way that their husbands did. But because women marry so late today (27.1 in 2018 vs.  20.8 in 1970 - see Table 1 below), if ever, their often lack of concern about military readiness presents an ever-increasing threat to our nation, one that enemies like Putin want to exploit.

        On Figure 1 there is a word for WOMEN at skip +1, but it is part of a bigger word for PEOPLE, so using it for odds calculations is a bit like finding men in the English word for women. Thus it was left off the spreadsheet.

4. (POLITICAL) EDUCATION - EMOTIONAL WOMEN DON'T HAVE THE GUTS TO STAND UP TO GOOFY LIBERAL PROFESSORS, MEN MORE OFTEN DO. See Figure 2C.

5. HOSTILE SEXISM. I didn't know what this term meant until I read the explanation in the Washington Post.  They state that, “hostile sexism,” a set of antagonistic attitudes toward women that stem from a belief that women want to control men. Supposedly men who worry about this are more likely to vote Republican. See Figure 2D.

       In thinking back at my careers as an educator and as a Navy Reserve, then Coast Guard Reserve officer, I have only had five women who were my bosses - all in education. Three were school principals, another was a vice principal, and a fifth was a Science Department chair-person. One (in summer school) was a principal (an African American), at Cutler Ridge Middle School in Miami. She allowed a teacher in a classroom that adjoined mine to leave school early each morning and return just before school ended. The result was day-long riots in the next room. When I complained to her about what was going on I was told, "If you don't like it, you can leave." I immediately went down to the teachers’ lounge and called Coast Guard Pacific Area in Alameda, California. I asked them if they needed a readiness planner for the summer. They said "yes," and asked me how fast could get out there. I said, "Tomorrow." They hired me, and I went right back down to the principal 's office to tender my immediate resignation. God bless the Coast Guard.

       A second principal at Roosevelt Middle School (a magnet school) in West Palm Beach was also nuts. She transferred every white teacher out of the school. Two women disliked Jews. Only a principal at Forest Hill High in West Palm Beach was nice. She very much appreciated what I was doing for her school, helping to raise it from a "D" school (on probation) to an "A" school. However, although in 30 years 4 of my 5 experiences with women bosses were negative, I have never given any thought to a woman trying to control me.  It certainly wasn't a factor in any election that I voted in, nor have I ever heard a Republican express any concern about this issue. I think this problem is one manufactured by liberals at the Washington Post.

       There were no close matches of two words sought for SEXISM with the axis term on Figure 1, but there was a match in 351 letters with DEMOGRAPHIC at skip -82671. However while I don't think that a problem has existed with respect to men worried about women controlling men, perhaps Nancy Pelosi thinks we should change. On 11/9/2018 Pelosi said during an interview in the conference room of her minority-leader suite in the Capitol late Friday (11/9/2018): “What Mueller might not think is indictable could be impeachable.”

       Pelosi said she’s not sure of Trump's mental condition. She thinks he’s degraded the Constitution and American values (hey Nancy - Americans have values, you do not). She says the intelligence assessments are indisputable in showing that Russia interfered in the 2016 election. She thinks the firing of Jeff Sessions and the appointment of Matthew Whitaker as acting attorney general in a clear move against the Mueller probe “is perilously close to a constitutional crisis.” She would like to see evidence for collusion, but thinks maybe there’s something else in his tax returns. Maybe there’s something that’s beyond the special counsel’s scope. Maybe there’s something Trump has yet to do. “That’s why we want to see the documents,” Pelosi said. “Because we’re seeking truth. We’re seeking truth for the American people about the integrity of our elections, and honoring the Constitution.”

         No, Nancy, you do not seek truth. You seek only an excuse to impeach to try to overturn the integrity of the 2016 election. It doesn't matter (to you) that you won't get a conviction in the Senate. What matters is that you complete your collusion with Putin and his disinformation program know as Active Measures which is discussed below in conjunction with Figure 4. 

FIGURE 4 - ONE ACTIVE MEASURE OUT OF MANY PUTIN ACTIVE MEASURES. What are active measures? Wkipedia states:

Active measures (Russian: активные мероприятия) is a term for the actions of political warfare conducted by the Soviet and Russian security services (Cheka, OGPU, NKVD, KGB, FSB) to influence the course of world events, in addition to collecting intelligence and producing "politically correct" assessment of it.^[1] Active measures range "from media manipulations to special actions involving various degrees of violence". They were used both abroad and domestically. They included disinformation, propaganda, counterfeiting official documents, assassinations, and political repression, such as penetration into churches, and persecution of political dissidents.^[1]

How does this relate to the 2016 election? Wikipedia states:

Russia's alleged disinformation campaign, its involvement in the UK's withdrawal from the EU and the election of Donald Trump as President of the United States, and its support of far-right movements in the West has been compared to the Soviet Union's active measures in that it aims to "disrupt and discredit Western democracies".^[26][27]

STATISICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF FIGURE 4. Figure 4 is based on the 5^th lowest ELS of ACTIVE MEASURE. Initially I was looking for one of many active measures - Operation Infektion, which was one of the Russian measures in which fake news was put out blaming the U.S. for inventing AIDS in order to kill all blacks and homosexuals. They planted their fiction in the Indian press, and eventually succeeded in getting Dan Rather to spout their lies on a CBS Evening News.  Initial matrices were not compact enough to meet my standards, so I looked for Active Measures. The plural term offered by Google Translate was too long to have any real chance to be found at an ELS  (12 letters: אמצעים פעילים).  But this article is about only about one active measure - that taken by Russia to interfere with our 2016 election. When I checked Google Translate to find ACTIVE MEASURE, they offered מדד פעיל which only is 7 letters and which has 4 hits in unwrapped Torah (one computer pass through the 304,805 letters of Torah) but 19 hits unwrapped Torah (multiple passes mimicking how Jews read the Torah).

       On Figure 4 the most significant a priori term is PUTIN. Before making adjustments for ELS rank 5 of the axis term, this best spelling of PUTIN was found at a special case skip against odds of about 354 to 1. I looked for Clinton and Trump, but only found CLINTON at a special case skip (-1) against odds of about 6.7 to 1. While it may look impressive that the word for DECEIVER at skip -1 shared a letter yud with ACTIVE MEASURE, it actually had about an 89% chance to be found at a special case skip somewhere on the 861-letter matrix because the letter in a forward direction are part of AND SAID, which is found at a very high frequency in Torah. VOTE was found at skip +1 against odds of about 5 to 1. After dividing the combined odds against the matrix by 5 to take into account ELS rank 5 of the axis term, the matrix was found against odds of about 3,528 to 1.

CONLUSION. Obviously the nation is very closely and extremely deeply and radically divided. Demographics make clear who is on which side, but our Russian enemies like Putin don't care as much about who wins as they do that we will tear our nation apart the way that the Soviet Union was torn apart. With their help America has already elected one Communist (Obama), one CIA Director (John Brennan) and a bunch of Socialist or Communist senators (like Sanders) and Congress members. The divisions seen today somehow managed to be encoded into Torah and published about 3,300 years ago. I do not know if our future can be changed, but it is possible. This article was followed by our Intelligence Community as I wrote it. For those there who waited several days for me to find Figure 4, thanks for your patience. An AI like I envision in Project Creator Decoder would have seen the need to switch the axis term sought faster than I did. You folks know the bottom line - fund Project Creator Decoder!