Monitoring of Our Sites by DoD & Level-3 Communications.

     The best instructor that I ever had was a Navy lieutenant named Buckholtz. He taught Navy ROTC at the University of Pennsylvania where I was a midshipman between 1967 and 1968. LT Buckholtz said that as a naval officer I wasn't expected to know the answers to all questions, but I was expected to know how to find them. Then he asked me if I could accomplish a certain task.

    “I think so,” I answered.

    “Wrong answer,” he said. “This is the U.S. Navy. It is a can do organization. You either can do or you can’t. If can do, we need you, if you can’t – get out.”

    I stayed with the Navy for over 10 years until I was passed over for lieutenant commander. Thus I had to get out in 1980. I really missed it. So in 1983 I joined the Coast Guard as an enlisted man (E-5). I then earned a direct commission and became an ensign again. As with the Navy, I wasn't selected for lieutenant commander, and so I retired. Normally when someone is twice passed over, it’s impossible to come back on active duty. But I refused to take “no” for an answer. And so, against all odds, I was recalled to active duty in 2003 and held on active until my 60^th birthday in May, 2017. What did I do at that later age? I wrote Navy and Coast Guard war and disaster response plans.

     That should have been the end of my military career. On the record, it was. Off the record, as I attempt to answer a number of seemingly impossible questions posed by mankind, I find that my writings are constantly under surveillance by NASA which (given my son’s and my writings about Mars) isn't a surprise. It’s the never ending surveillance of our work by the Defense Establishment (especially Army Intelligence at Fort Huachuca, Arizona - who times poses as NASA ) and a defense contractor know as Level-3 Communications that has caught my attention. Fort Huachuca I view as allies. There is some sensitive evidence to indicate that may even have played a role in finding my son a great job. But Level-3 is a more of a mystery because while I often track it back to Fort Huachuca and other legitimate defense sites, I have also on several occasions, as with IP address 95.220.198.8, tracked the Kremlin back to Level-3. When I see security concerns like this I flag them with the certain knowledge that Fort Huachuca will follow up on the tip (although, amusingly, I now know that man of these folks who seem like enemies are in fact Huachuca), . The IP link is not necesarrily evidence of wrong-doing. On Figure 1A the L-3 Network clearly indicates a link with Moscow. I maintain massive records of all Kremlin readers on our sites. See slide 62 on our PowerPoint Mars Correct? Mars is Wet! for an example of what our Russian records look like. Whether Fort Huachuca will ever let my son and I know exactly why they read whatever we write remains to be seen, but in keeping with what LT Buckholtz taught me about finding answers to tough questions, I can find a lot of answers simply by observing who is reading our stuff.

        When checking out readers of special interest I use IP addresses and Reverse IP addresses. What exactlyis a reverse IP? In the Kremlin-Level 3 relationship above the Kremlin IP address is 95.220.198.8. The Level 3 address has the same set of digits, but the groups are reversed. Thus Level 3 there is 8.198.220.95. Among other things, a forward-confirmed reverse DNS verification can create a form of authentication showing a valid relationship between the owner of a domain name and the owner of the server that has been given an IP address.

      In this article I will look at what, if anything, the Code reveals about these people. I'll discuss what’s unusual about their monitoring.  The biggest question is whether they just monitor my son (a PhD in physics) for what we have discovered and can prove about Mars that contradicts NASA, or are they monitoring us for what we know about how the Torah got written, how the future was written into a 3,300 year old text, and how in terms of physics, signals could have sent back in time to the days of Moses, or how they could be sent back in time to the present. Clearly the latter possibilities could have enormous military implications. The record indicates that they closely follow both topics (as does NASA), however in August 2016 I was confronted by an apparent member of the Intelligence Community who left me with the impression that they were extremely interested in some time-related research that they have reason to believe David will eventually be involved with. NASA (in particular NASA Ames) also tracks such articles closely. For example, while I was writing this article, someone at Google Mountain View (where NASA Ames is collocated) with an IP address starting with 66.249.83.xxx accessed my article about Resurrection and Reversing Time.

     I want to be clear up front. I'm a modern Orthodox Jew. I believe in God. But my son, while raised in a religious home, prefers a scientific explanation for what he has watched been found over the last 20 years of my Codes research. I caught Fort Huachuca back on my site as I started to write this article on October 22, 2017. If they want me to cease and desist before I finish the article, they know how to reach me. If their interest is focused on David, they should contact him, but from evidence we have seen of phone tapping, I think they know it's better for them to deal with me directly. I have great loyalty to our military. David can get a little hot headed over all this monitoring. He has to have more (kind) persuasion. 

Figure 1B above shifts the focus to the right from what was shown on Figure 1A to capture a transliteration of (YOU SENT FROM) CASIMIR. The possibility of using the Casimir Effect for time travel will be discussed more at the end of this article, but there is a possibility that this is what Level 3 and DoD are tracking us for. The probability calculation for Figure 1B is given below.

STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF FIGURES 1A and 1B. As per my usual protocol, no statistical significance was assigned to the axis term, here the 60th lowest ELS of LEVEL THREE in wrapped or unwrapped Torah. In Hebrew ROFFMAN can be spelled with as little as 4 letters or as many as 7. If my name were found at a special case skip (+/- 1 or the absolute skip of the axis term) in a single column with LEVEL THREE at the lowest skip, it would be against odds of about 2,209 to 1, but with the axis term ELS rank only at 60, we divide the odds by 60 and can say that the find of my name this way was only against odds of about 36.8 to 1. The most significant a priori term on Figure 1A is MARS. It was found at a special case skip against odds of about 88 to 1. I looked for a transliteration of KOREA at a special case skip too because Level Three (and to a lesser degree Drake Holding Company) and DoD monitor my Torah Codes articles about political and military situations, and I have many articles up about Korea due to the nuclear threat it poses. I found KOREA as desired against odds of about 44 to 1. Overall Figure 1A was found against odds of about 304,241 to 1. 

     With  Figure 1B we sacrifice MARS but gain an ELS of YOU SENT FROM CASIMIR. Of this only the transliteration of FROM CASIMIR was found a priori. I was looking for FROM CASIMIR because I suspect if there is such a thing as a temporal field, it would likely be on a very small (nanometer) scale similar to that found between the plates of a device used to measure Casimir Forces that are described later in this article. It remains to be seen whether Casimir Forces can be related to time travel. An initial assessment of such claims by the Anderson Institute was not supported by my son's evaluation of what they offered for supporting math. But even a broken clock is right twice per day. What is certain is that when I began to write about Casimir in conjunction with sending signals or more into the past, monitoring by Level Three and especially by DoD increased greatly - as though we had touched a nerve. For the past two years I have been investigating whether there might be signals detectable that might be sent from a physics lab in future - one that might employ my son. So I thought it was interesting that the full ELS here of YOU SENT FROM CASIMIR is at the same skip as ROFFMAN, but YOU SENT was only found a posteriori and thus cannot be part of my statistics calculation. The word CASIMIR can spelled at least 11 ways in Hebrew, with the S letter represented by a shin, samech or even a zayin. The letter C can be represented by a caf or qof.  Checking 11 transliterations, I found the one shown against odds of about 50 to 1. I found an ELS of WARNING, but it was not at a special case skip though it did touch BARACK and I have almost a hundred Codes articles posted that warn of all the damage that Barack Hussein Obama did (and will still do) to the United States. These articles are read almost daily by DoD. Figure 1B is slightly larger than Figure 1A. It was found against odds of about 24,999 to 1. That's not as significant as Figure 1A, but I think the overall message is clearer on Figure 1B than it is on Figure 1A.

FIGURE 2 AND ITS STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE. As per my usual protocol, no statistical significance was assigned to the axis term, here the 4th lowest ELS of ROFFMAN in unwrapped Torah. In 20 years of Codes research I don't remember ever doing a matrix like this where my last name is spelled with 7 letters, letter for letter as it is in English - resh (R) vav (O) feh (F) feh (F) mem (M) alef (A) nun (N) - although I see that with this spellling of Roffman at skip -11,258 I can place it with Ark of the Covenant in the open text in a 225-letter matrix.

        The mysterious company that tracks me so closely is Level Three Communications. LEVEL THREE is found on Figure 2, only one skip off that of the axis term. Before factoring in the ELS rank of ROFFMAN, LEVEL THREE is found against odds of about 187 to 1. Level Three reads everything new that I write about Mars. There is a short ELS of MARS at skip -1 on the matrix. It's at a special case skip against odds of about 13 to 1. Other a priori terms BARRY, DAVID and MONITOR all had better than a 68% chance to being somewhere on the 817-letter matrix. However, while no extra value is assigned to MONITOR because it is not at the skip of the 7-letter axis term, it's at the absolute skip of 7-letter LEVEL THREE. So a case could be made for only looking at its frequency at special case skips, but I'll pass on that technique here.The matrix was found against odds of about 1,313 to 1.

        The main thing I sought on this matrix was information about Level Three and why they thought it was worth 708 days nonstop to be on one article on ArkCode.com. Mars came up, but war in the open text required an expansion to 1,222 letters to find. For here let it be said that they read our Mars research. I have other information about them that I will defer publishing for now, but I do appreciate their interest and I'm ready to assist them on defense matters approved by the U.S. Government. Meanwhile, I invite them to track me with their modern equipment while I track them on a 3,300-year old Code. Hey L-3 guys, I'm retired, and this is how I get my kicks. I see you here again this week. Tag! You're it. But I also see a Chinese IP address (125.91.140.192) here again. I've self-censored a lot on this article but the smart move is to move us onto the team in a serious way where can contribute to the program in a meaningful way.

WHO IS L-3? L3 Technologies, formerly L-3 Communications Holdings, is an American company that supplies command and control, communications, intelligence, surveillance (including of us) and reconnaissance (C3ISR) systems and products, avionics, ocean products, training devices and services, instrumentation, aerospace, and navigation products. Its customers include the Department of Defense, Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Government intelligence agencies, NASA, aerospace contractors and commercial telecommunications and wireless customers. The fact that they serve NASA likely explains why they follow our Mars-related articles on Davidaroffman.com and MarsCorrect.com. That they are involved with instrumentation and aerospace products reinforces why they are likely interested in our work. We totally challenge the reliability of all weather-related instrumentation on the Mars Science Laboratory and on earlier landers on Mars. If you have read our report Abstract before, skip the next two paragraphs. If you haven't then in order to really understand why my son and I are monitored so closely, please read it now: The December 3, 2017 version of our Abstract is as follows:

 BASIC REPORT for MARS CORRECT – CRITIQUE OF ALL NASA MARS WEATHER DATA

ABSTRACT: We present evidence that NASA is seriously understating Martian air pressure. Our 8-year study critiques 1,889 Sols (over 5 terrestrial years, 2.82 Martian years) of highly problematic MSL Rover Environmental Monitoring Station (REMS) weather data, and offers an in depth audit of over 8,311 hourly Viking 1 and 2 weather reports. We discuss analysis of technical papers, NASA documents, and personal interviews of transducer designers. We troubleshoot pressures based on radio occultation/spectroscopy, and the previously accepted small pressure ranges that could be measured by Viking 1 and 2 (18 mbar), Pathfinder and Phoenix (12 mbar), and MSL (11.5 mbar - altered to 14 mbar in 2017). For MSL there were several pressures published at or slightly above the initial advertised upper range of the pressure sensor. Indeed, from August 30 to September 5, 2012 pressures initially published were from 737 mbar to 747 mbar – two orders of magnitude high – only to be retracted. We challenged them all and NASA revised them down, however 8 years into this audit it has come to our attention that of two pressure sensors ordered by NASA for Mars Pathfinder, one of them (Tavis Dash No. 1) could in fact measure up to 1,034 mbar. Further, for the MSL according to an Abstract to the American Geophysical Union for the Fall 2012 meeting, The Finnish Meteorological Institute (FMI) states of their MSL (and Phoenix) Vaisala transducers, “The pressure device measurement range is 0 – 1025 hPa in temperature range of -45°C – 55°C, but its calibration is optimized for the Martian pressure range of 4 – 12 hPa..” So while we originally thought that of the five landers on Mars that had meteorological suites, none of them could measure Earth-like pressures, in fact, assuming that the higher pressure sensor Pathfinder Tavis Dash 1 (0-15 PSIA/1,034 mbar) was sent rather than Tavis Dash 2 (0-0.174 PSIA/12 mbar), three landers were actually equipped to get the job done, but the public was largely kept in the dark about it. All 19 low UV values were removed when we asked about them, although they eventually restored 12 of them. REMS always-sunny opacity reports were contradicted by Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter photos. Why REMS Team data was so wrong is a matter of speculation beyond the basic thrust of this report, but we demonstrate that their weather data was regularly revised after they studied critiques in working versions of this report and on our websites at http://marscorrect.com and http://davidaroffman.com.

We note that Vikings and MSL showed consistent timing of daily pressure spikes which we link to how gas pressure in a sealed container would vary with Absolute temperature, to heating by radioisotope thermoelectric generators (RTGs), and to dust clots at air access tubes and dust filters. Pathfinder, Phoenix and MSL wind measurement failed. Phoenix and MSL pressure transducer design problems included confusion about dust filter location, and lack of information about nearby heat sources due to International Traffic and Arms Regulations (ITAR). NASA Ames could not replicate dust devils at 10 mbar. Rapidly filled MER Spirit tracks required wind speeds of 80 mph at the assumed low pressures. These winds were never recorded on Mars. Nor could NASA explain drifting Barchan sand dunes. Based on the above and dust devils on Arsia Mons to altitudes of 17 km above areoid (Martian equivalent of sea level), spiral storms with 10 km eye-walls above Arsia Mons and similar storms above Olympus Mons (over 21 km high), dust storm opacity, snow at Phoenix, excessive aero braking, liquid water running on the surface in numerous locations at Recurring Slope Lineae (RSL) and stratus clouds 13 km above areoid, we argue for an average pressure at areoid of ~511 mbar rather than the accepted 6.1 mbar. This pressure grows to 1,050 mbar in the Hellas Basin.

       The fact that L-3 also serves the Department of Defense and U.S. Intelligence agencies further explains why they follow Arkcode.com. Although I am an Orthodox Jew, as a member of the military who wrote war plans, my original motivation for Codes research was to learn if the Torah Code can be used to generate actionable military intelligence. I also wanted to know if the Codes could be used to prevent or mitigate the effects of disasters.  While my son wasn't directly hired by L-3 (really by the company that bought out L-3 in 2016: CACI), he did apply for an L-3 position.  As noted above, CACI is a major employer in Brevard County. Indeed their nearest office is under three miles from my home in Cape Canaveral. When I found that an Orlando office of L-3/CACI spent 708 days on one of our articles, I actually went over to their office and had a 30 minute conversation with them about our Mars research. The guy I spoke with, Fred Anderson, promised to set up a chance for me to present my findings to a local astronomy club that he belongs to, but I'm still waiting for a date. However, of course, I wasn't looking for a speaking engagement. I was looking for information about who is monitoring us, and why they are doing so. I also wanted to help David get a local job. I left Fred with my card, David's card and a copy of his CV too. My son really hated living at Yale (too cold and insanely liberal). While he spoke a lot about living up north before his post doc when he experienced his first real winter he quickly developed true appreciation for the paradise we live in down here. There's reason from our IP records to believe that there's a chance that L-3/CACI, or at least their interest in our research may have played a role in David finding employment, but we don't know for sure and we won't push David's luck by asking about it. If they did help him, then we appreciate it, but I'd like to know about their full agenda.

        David, who spent a summer at CERN working on the LHC in 2013, now works with linear accelerators. His post doc at Yale was in the field of Radiation Therapy Physics. And that is the kind of work that he's doing now. While I can't (yet, at least) say that there's any connection with his current job and anything to do with time, a quick search on-line revealed a statement by Stephen Hawking that "Particle accelerators are the closest things we have to time machines." The link just given reveals that:

In 2010, physicist Stephen Hawking wrote an article for the UK paper the Daily Mail explaining how it might be possible to travel through time. We would just need a particle accelerator large enough to accelerate humans the way we accelerate particles, he said.

A person-accelerator with the capabilities of the Large Hadron Collider would move its passengers at close to the speed of light. Because of the effects of special relativity, a period of time that would appear to someone outside the machine to last several years would seem to the accelerating passengers to last only a few days. By the time they stepped off the LHC ride, they would be younger than the rest of us.

Hawking wasn’t actually proposing we try to build such a machine. But he was pointing out a way that time travel already happens today. For example, particles called pi mesons are normally short-lived; they disintegrate after mere millionths of a second. But when they are accelerated to nearly the speed of light, their lifetimes expand dramatically. It seems that these particles are traveling in time, or at least experiencing time more slowly relative to other particles.

        Let's think about what David will work with - linear accelerators. Here I will turn to the text book that he used at Yale  - Radiation Therapy Physics, Second Edition, by William R. Hendee and Geoffrey S. Ibbot. In its discussion of Linear Accelerators (page 77) we find that the velocity of the accelerated electrons can be determined from the classical equation for kinetic energy:

T = ½ m_ev²                         Equation 1

where m_e is the electron's mass and v is its velocity. The text continues by stating:

It is straightforward to calculate the velocity of a 1 eV electron as 1.87 X 10⁷ m/s, or 6.25% of the speed of light. To accelerate electrons to higher energies requires either that the potential difference be increased (impractical at voltages above a few hundred thousand volts), or that the accelerating force be repeated numerous times. Note that the classical equation just given cannot be used once the electron becomes relativistic or when its velocity exceeds approximately 20% of the speed of light.

Before continuing with the summary from radiation therapy physics, let's look at some problems where electron volts are converted into speeds. We calculate that the 1 eV speed should be 0.001978C rather than .0625C.   Please pardon how the square root sign is displayed as

    ___________________    .                                                           

V                       

Given 

1 eV = 1.6 C 10¹⁹ J

c = 3.00 X 10⁸ m/s

m_e = 9.1 X 10^-31 kg

Find the speed of an electron with a kinetic energy of 100 eV.

The relationship between kinetic energy and velocity is

E = γ mc^{2 =} K + mc²

             1

______________  mc²  = K + mc²

   ___________

\/ 1 – (v/c)²

where m is the rest mass of the electron and K is the kinetic energy of the electron. Solving for velocity gives

              1

  ______________  =   K     + 1

   ___________       mc²

\/ 1 – (v/c)²

              1

  ______________  =  (  K     + 1)²

                                  mc²

            1 – (v/c)²

1 – (v/c)² =          1  __

                  (  K     + 1)²

                    mc²

                        1

(v/c)² = 1 -                

                  ( K     + 1)²

                    mc²

           _________

v = c\/ 1 –          1                 (Equation A)

                  ( K     + 1)²

                    mc²

Next convert the kinetic energy into Joules and substitute the appropriate values into Equation A

K = (100 eV) (1.6 X 10-¹⁹Joules) = 1.6 X 10^-17 Joules

                             1 eV

           _________

v = c\/ 1 –          1                                                    = 0.0198c

                  (1.6 X 10^-17 Joules                       + 1)²

                              (9.1 X 10^-31 kg)(3.00 X 10⁸ m/s)²

So for 100 eV an electron has a speed of 1.98% of the speed of light. This makes the calculation from the Radiation Therapy Physics textbook that the velocity of a 1 eV electron is, or 6.25% of the speed of light seem high.

Now let’s increase the kinetic energy a thousand fold to 100 keV

K = (100 X10³ eV) (1.6 X 10-¹⁹Joules) = 1.6 X 10^-14 Joules

                             1 eV

           _________

v = c\/ 1 –          1                                                    = 0.548c

                  (1.6 X 10^-14 Joules                       + 1)²

                    (9.1 X 10^-31 kg)(3.00 X 10⁸ m/s)²

So for 100 keV an electron has a speed of 54.8% of the speed of light.

Now, let’s look at what happens to speed at 1 MeV.

K = (100 X10⁶ eV) (1.6 X 10-¹⁹Joules) = 1.6 X 10^-13 Joules

                             1 eV

           _________

v = c\/ 1 –          1                                                    = 0.941c

                  (1.6 X 10^-13 Joules                       + 1)²

                              (9.1 X 10^-31 kg)(3.00 X 10⁸ m/s)²

So for 1 MeV an electron has a speed of 94.1% of the speed of light.

       At 1 GeV with K = 1. X 10^-10 Joules the electron gets up to a speed of 99.999987% of light speed. However, my son works with linear accelerators only in the 6 MeV and 18 MeV range.  At 6 MeV the electrons are moving at 0.9969c. That means that for every second the electron might age, the operator would age about 12.7 seconds. At 18 MeV the speed of an electron is 0.9996c.

       At 18 MeV the speed is 0.9996c and for every second the electron ages the operator would see about 35.58 seconds pass. The same ratios would hold with years used as the units of time rather than seconds. But before you get too excited, realize that with linear accelerators the electrons move at best a few meters before hitting their targets and so the actual time differential will be also extremely small. As David says the linear accelerator that he works with now is like a toy compared with what he worked with at C.E.R.N. But "toys" (models) in science and engineering are often useful before constructing full size working units, and whether electrons or larger particles, they can be accelerated in a loop that does not have to have a target like linear accelerators have.

NOW, CONTINUING WITH THE SUMMARY FROM RADIATION THERAPY PHYSICS

       In cyclotrons positive ions (e.g., (¹H+, ²H+, ³He+, or ⁴He⁺⁺) are forced into circular paths by a magnetic field. Polarity reversals across dees result in particle acceleration (A cyclotron accelerates a charged beam particle using a high frequency alternating voltage which is applied between two hollow "D"-shaped sheet metal electrodes called "dees" inside a vacuum chamber). The radius of the orbit followed by the ions within a dee is described by Equation 2:

r = mv/Bq                       Equation 2

where r is the radius in meters, m is the mass of the accelerated particles in kilograms, v is the velocity of the particles in meters per second, q is the charge in coulombs, and B is the magnetic field in webers per square meter. If the magnetic field intensity B and the mass m are constant, the radius of the orbit increases linearly with the velocity of the accelerated particles.

       The time T for a half revolution of the particle in a dee is:

T = πm/Bq                    Equation 3

       If the mass of the particle remains constant, the time for a half-revolution is also constant, and the emergence of the particles from the dees is synchronized easily with changes in polarity. But here is where relativity comes into play. The mass m of a particle with velocity v is:                                                                           

m = m_{0/(1 – v}²_/c²₎ ^½    Equation 4

        Equation 4 is analogous to equation 5 which describes how relativistic velocity affects time passed.

   t = t'_{/(1 – v}²_/c²₎ ^½      Equation 5

     In nuclear medicine the emphasis is on what happens to the mass. m is the mass of the moving particle while m₀ is "rest mass" of the same particle when stationary. V is the velocity of the particle in meters per second and c is the speed of light (3 X 10⁸ meters per second). From Equation 4 we see that the mass of the moving particle is greater than the mass of the same particle when stationary. The change in mass is the relativistic increase in mass with velocity. When the velocity of particles in a cyclotron reaches about 0.2 c, the increased mass of the particles disturbs the synchronization between the emergence of particles from the dees and the changing polarity across the dees.

      A deuteron is the nucleus of a deuterium atom, consisting of a proton and a neutron. Deuterons can be accelerated in a cyclotron to a maximum energy of around 35 MeV. More than that and the relativistic mass increase causes the deuterons to emerge from the dees out of phase with the changing polarity of the dees. In comparison electrons reach the limiting velocity of 0.2 c when their kinetic energy is only 10 kev. Therefore electrons are not accelerated in cyclotrons. In synchrocyclotrons deuterons have been accelerated to energies up to 200 MeV.

       Before turning our attention to time, which is what I think the Government is at least partially interested in with my son for reasons that I will review later in this article, lets take Equation 4 and plug in some numbers to get an idea of how mass changes at a velovity of 0.2 c. Although nobody is (as far as I know) accelerated a mass anywhere near 1 kg, since that's the unit given by the textbook, we'll use that too. For C we will use 1 and for v we will use 0.2.

m = m_{0/(1 – v}²_/c²₎ ^½

m = _{1 kg/(1 – 0.2}²_/1²₎ ^½

m = _{1 kg/(1 – 0.2}²_/1²₎ ^½

m = _{1 kg/(1 – 0.04/1)} ^½

m = _{1 kg/(1 – 0.04)} ^½

m = _{1 kg/(0.96)} ^½

m = _{1 kg/0.97979589711327}

_{m = 1.0206207261 kg}

       A similar distortion would take place with time. Just replace kilograms with years. Moving at 20% of speed of light a particle that ages 1 year would see 1.0206207261 years (about an extra 7.5 days) go by back on Earth. While relativity places strains on humans small particles like nanochips might be more suited for accelerations in the range of 0.2 c. Two issues here are:

(1) How small can a nanochip be?

(2) What are the potential uses of a particle like a nanochip being accelerated?

       When we get to question (2) we'll look at an a incident that leads me to believe our Government took the risk of a temporal anomaly in order to facilitate or expedite development of this technology. Again, to my friends in DoD, if you don't want me writing about this on a public network, you need to contact me or provide a suitable research platform - preferably in the local area at Patrick Air Force Base. As for my son, you might gain access to his skills by offering the company he works for a contract that would allow him to spend the required time to get the necessary math or programming done. David is aware of the level of monitoring going on, and he would like to lead a more normal life. For those who think I'm joking about the monitoring, consider Figure 3 which shows most of my IP address, and my reverse IP address - which is Brookhaven National Laboratory. Why is that significant? Well, earlier I cited an article in which Stephen Hawking said, "Particle accelerators are the closest things we have to time machines." It turns out that the same article tells us this:

The highest temperature recorded by a manmade device was achieved in a particle accelerator.

In 2012, Brookhaven National Laboratory’s Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider achieved a Guinness World Record for producing the world’s hottest manmade temperature, a blazing 7.2 trillion degrees Fahrenheit. But the Long Island-based lab did more than heat things up. It created a small amount of quark-gluon plasma, a state of matter thought to have dominated the universe’s earliest moments. This plasma is so hot that it causes elementary particles called quarks, which generally exist in nature only bound to other quarks, to break apart from one another.

        Is it is coincidence that the phenomal accelerator at Brookhaven is tied into our home? I doubt it, but I'll return to this issue later. For the record I have been asked by many people about how I learned of this connection. The answer is linked to 34 years of naval and Coast Guard service and my love of military matters. I simply pulled a "Crazy Ivan." Kudos to those who know what I mean. For those who don't:

The baffles is the area in the water directly behind a submarine or ship through which a hull-mounted sonar cannot hear. This blind spot is caused by the need to insulate the sonar array, commonly mounted near the bow, from the noise of the vessel's machinery. During the Cold War, one submarine would frequently attempt to follow another by hiding in its baffles. This led to the practice of "clearing the baffles", that is, turning to observe the blind spot and detect any followers. Related maneuvers included the "Crazy Ivan", a hard turn to clear the baffles and position the submarine to attack any followers.

    By pulling a Crazy Ivan I mean that I check my own backside to see who's attaching themselves to my research just like I check everyone else's research (generally on Mars) to see how it relates to the ultimate truth. I have nothing to hide when it comes to Martian weather research. If the Government wants to put out disinformation about Mars, I will expose them whenever I can unless I'm given damn good reason for not doing so. That hasn't happened yet. It might happen with what I know or suspect about movement in time, but I'm not at that point yet. Given all the evil out there (like the possibility that North Korea or Iran will cause a nuclear war) for now I'll give our snooping Government the benefit of the doubt and continue this article. But if you're Government and you track us on a regular basis there's a pretty good chance that we've got record to document the fact.

       The first question we had above was what is the world's smallest nano chip? Well, as of 2015, IBM made one which had the capacity to double processing speeds in smartphones and big data processors. They announced that they had developed functional nano chips measuring just seven nanometres. In comparison, a strand of human DNA is about 2.5 nm and the diameter of a single red blood cell is approximately 7,500 nm. A related but previously unstated question is what is the largest particle that has ever ben accelerated? Here Wikipedia states the following:

Nuclear physicists and cosmologists may use beams of bare atomic nuclei, stripped of electrons, to investigate the structure, interactions, and properties of the nuclei themselves, and of condensed matter at extremely high temperatures and densities, such as might have occurred in the first moments of the Big Bang. These investigations often involve collisions of heavy nuclei – of atoms like iron or gold – at energies of several GeV per nucleon. The largest such particle accelerator is the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) at Brookhaven National Laboratory.

That's curious. Our buddies at the other end of our IP address are also folks who can accelerate the largest particles. But a gold nucleus is only has a diameter of 1.4 X 10^-5 nanometers. However the diameter of a gold nucleus is only a small fraction of the diameter of a gold atom or ion. The approximate atomic radius of gold is 0.1441 nanometers which makes the diameter about 0.2882 nanometers. So the smallest chip, as of 2015, was only a little over 24 times larger than a gold atom.

      The second question is What are the potential uses of a particle like a nanochip being accelerated? Many times in science we first have to master a process and then we have to wait for technology to provide a practical use for what we have learned. It would have been great if after such acceleration information on the chip would be from the future. But as with an astronaut who flies off into space at speeds approaching light and then returns to Earth younger than his twin brother the information on the chip would be younger than that of chips that just aged at a normal rate. So the question here is when would newer versions of data be preferable to older versions of the same data? The answer may lie with the concept of data degradation. Wikipedia states:

Data degradation can also be used to describe the phenomenon of storage media gradually decaying over the duration of many hundreds of years. The cause of data decay varies depending on the medium:

Solid-state media, such as EPROMs, flash memory and other solid-state drives, store data using electrical charges, which can slowly leak away due to imperfect insulation. The chip itself is not affected by this, so reprogramming it once per decade or so will prevent data decay. The biggest problem can be finding a clean copy of the master data from which the chip may be reprogrammed; frequently, by the time the user discovers the data decay, the master data may be lost.

      Imagine that we want to treat a brain cancer patient with the cancer residing in a crucial part of the brain that's home to critical memories and skills. It might be the case that if we operate we can save the patient's life, but leave person in a vegetative state. Obviously it would be highly preferable to remove the diseased tissue and replace it with a newer version complete with memories and skills. We would then be free to provide drugs that would repress the cancer from reforming in the newer tissue. But here we would need to accelerate living tissue rather than a simple nonliving nanochip. Our knowledge of how to re-inscribe memories on to new tissue is not yet advanced enough.

      So when would it be beneficial to have a new version of data stored using electrical charges? Perhaps with an EMP attack, possibly launched by North Korea, Iran or terrorists who might buy nuclear weapons from cash-starved North Korea. Now here you may be thinking that we could simply use backups like flash drives to preserve clean versions of data. But that too might be destroyed by an EMP attack. Here I come to a major point that I believe merits serious investigation, perhaps by my son one day.

      Let's imagine that we have before us an accelerator. Now consider that it's accelerating particles at speeds where relativity becomes a factor. For those particles time isn't moving at the same rate as it is for any of us outside of the accelerator. I hypothesize a radius of X meters where the rate of time passage inside the device differs from the rate in the surrounding environment. At the "event horizon" of such a time differentiation there should be some kind of temporal field, something that I see lacking for discussions of relativistic events in conjunction with accelerators. If it can be shown that such a field exists, it may be the case that the field would block something like an electromagnetic pulse long enough to preserve data stored on the chip. Further, while David's initial feeling is that the different rate of time flow may be restricted to the relativistic particle, I'm asking him to consider the possibilty that as a relativistic particle moves past a point there may be generated a countercurrent in time - however small - that might enable a signal to travel back in time. But is there any reason to believe that it's worth the effort to detect such a field? Yes. The next section is brought forward and updated from my article entitled WARNING FROM THE FUTURE.

THERE'S MORE GOING ON HERE THAN JUST BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LAB OWNING THE REVERSE IP OF MY ROUTER.      

       When I began to put the Future Warning article up I warned that I might take it down if the U.S. Government made a request for me to do so, or it might be taken down by the Government without my permission.  Larry Taylor put the complete article up on his site. At that time it contained the name of a probable U.S. intelligence agent (first name - Joe) who had followed me and then questioned me about about my research. The interview on August 1, 2016 was, to say the least, the most bizarre encounter that I ever had. He revealed information that could have had a future source. After Larry published my article I decided to black out Joe's last name, and Larry was kind enough to replace the original version of my article with the self-censored version. However, if anyone has a copy of CodeFinder software and knows how to use it, the name can be easily obtained. It's formed by five sequential letters in Torah.

        I think it’s important to avoid transmitting Joe's last name. For those who might believe that I have clear access to the future, let me assure them that it isn't so. Thus I've never won the lotto. The Torah Codes, in general, gives me at best a rough picture of what might occur, but it's very fuzzy. As for Joe, at best he may have been asked to interview me based on new technology, but from the look of his car, he also has likely never won a lottery. If he contacted me per Government instructions it's certain that he would NOT be permitted to have direct access to technology that could be used for personal gain. Therefore he would be unable to respond to an infinite number of requests to help get warning signals back to people who would be killed by accident, or by design. Such technology, if it does or will exist, would likely be restricted to preventing Extinction Level Events. Having stated this, knowing that the original article has been read by the Department of Defense agencies that I wanted to see it, I will leave as much of the original article as I can below, redacting it as seems prudent.

       I know that many of my fans are religious Christians or, like me, Orthodox Jews. However many are from the military or NASA. Again, my original purpose for starting 20 years of Torah Codes research was to determine if the Code is real or an illusion due to poor search protocols. While I soon focused on clues about the location of the Ark of the Covenant, the thrust of most of my matrices relate to whether the Code has data that can be used for contingency planning by the U.S. military. During an interview by the History Channel in 2004 I was asked about who wrote the Code. In my answer (at 2:59 to 3:50 of Part 3 of the show) I discussed three possible sources – (1) God (my belief), (2) aliens from the future (Michael Drosnin’s choice in his book entitled The Bible Code), or (3) a human from the future. Clearly the Author somehow managed to transfer information from the future to the past when the Torah was first transcribed. The disturbing incident that took place in August, 2016 raised another possibility. Figure 4 above was found with an axis term of SIGNAL FROM FUTURE. While the issue of relativity discussed with accelerators earlier did not reveal how signals from the future could travel back in time, the creation and measurement of hypothesized temporal fields may be a necessary step in figuring out how accomplish this task with or without the discovery of transluminal (faster than light) tachyons.

THE INCIDENT LEADING TO FIGURES 4 AND 5.

       On August 1, 2016 I drove my son’s car from my home in Cape Canaveral, Florida to Wells Fargo to pay my mortgage, and then went on to the Cape Canaveral Public Library to return at least one book, and check out another. When I parked there was no other vehicle anywhere nearby. I was inside for not more than 5 minutes. When I came out a man had parked his car 2 spaces left of mine. He was not coming inside the library, but was in fact standing to the right of his car, essentially blocking access to the vehicle that I was using. He seemed to be waiting for me (see the location on Figure 5).

        As is usually the case, I was dressed with a ball cap that reads U.S. Coast Guard Retired and Proudly Served. I was also wearing a navy colored shirt with the name of one of the ten Navy ships or two Coast Guard ships that I served on in my 34 years of active and reserve military duty.

         The gentleman (Joseph) promptly thanked me for my service. I asked him if he was in too, and he said he was during the Vietnam War, so I thanked him for his service. That might have been the end of the incident, except that once I start talking to a vet I generally start swapping sea stories or the like.

       In short order the conversation turned to my Mars and Codes research. But Joe wanted to talk about nanotechnology and about artificial intelligence (AI). And that was when I began to think that there was something odd about what he was describing – because in my hand I was carrying the book that I had just checked out – Slant by Greg Bear. On the inside jacket of the book the second paragraph reads as follows:

       In the sixth decade of the 21^st century the world has been transformed by two things. Nanotechnology has been perfected, giving humans the ability to change their environment and themselves down to the cellular level. And the study of the mind has brought a revolution in both human psychotherapy and artificial intelligence.

       Only when I heard about his interests did I raise the book and show him that I had just selected a book about his concerns.

       We discussed the future dangers inherent in abuse of both types of technology. Eventually, when I began to search for Figure 4 I settled on FUTURE WARNING as in ideal axis term based on what we had discussed. But I also looked for the words ARTIFICIAL and INTELLIGENCE. A word that means fake or ARTIFICIAL touches FUTURE WARNING and it also touches INTELLIGENCE twice. INTELLIGENCE also touches FUTURE WARNING. But there was far more to the incident (which went on for about a half hour) than I’ve just described, and what there was also relates to the matrix as well as to my son’s physics PhD thesis (Resonant Surface Scattering on Nanowires) and to his post-doctoral research into AI at Yale Medical School.

        Joseph made sure to tell me his full name twice, spelling it for me as X-X-X-X-X (the name is redacted here) the second time which was wise because I didn't quite get it right the first time. JOSEPH is on Figures 4 and 5 in the open text. However, because of the sensitivity of the issues discussed, I thought that the name was possibly bogus until I found Figure 5.  While I gave him my card, which reads LT Barry S. Roffman, USCG-Retired, Martian Meteorology Research along with included images of Mars as well as my phone numbers and web sites, he did not have a card for me. With respect to my card, he asked if he could keep it. Frankly I found that a bit odd. His reaction to it was almost akin to what would be expected if I were handing him a historical document.  He also indicated that he had an interest in meteorology.      

FIGURE 5 - JOSEPH IS FULLY DESCRIBED IN THE TORAH CODE, BUT THE FULL ENCODING REQUIRES CLASSIFICATION. With an axis term of SIGNAL FROM FUTURE it only takes 136 letters to show JOSEPH directly above his last name with both names open text or at skip +1. The author (G. BEAR) of the book I showed Joe, plus the word BOOK are all at skip +1. The matrix was found against odds of over 17,000,000 to 1. 

       Joe indicated that he lived near the National Security Agency (NSA) in Fort Meade, Maryland, but he claimed to not work for them although Army Intel might be a possibility. Again, probably the strangest thing about the incident was that he seemed to know of the book that I had just checked out.  On Figure 4 the word BOOK at skip +1 crosses and shares the letter peh with his name. The Hebrew word for BEAR, the author of the book was also at skip +1 three lines below and in the same columns as BOOK. BOOK and BEAR are also at skip +1 on Figure 5.              

       Why do I think Joe might have been Army Intel? We discussed an article that I had up about Hillary Clinton and Edward Snowden. The artwork included an image of Clinton with the question Wanted for president?  Next to it was a photo of Snowden with the words Wanted for treason? I part ways with many in our Intelligence community here. I believe Hillary was guilty of treason for how she handled e-mail plus her actions in the uranium sale to Russia. I think she should be imprisoned for both. I see Snowden as a hero who brought about much needed reform in how the NSA treats our citizens. There is another article about him at President Snowden? He is reshaping our law even now.

       So how does all this relate to Joseph (Joe)? One of the first readers for the Clinton/Snowden story had an IP address for the Lincoln Technical Institute. Their street address is 9325 Snowden River Parkway, Columbia, Maryland. The reverse IP address for them is at Fort Huachuca. I mentioned this to Joe, but I mispronounced the name of the fort - calling it HU-A-CHU-CA. He corrected me, telling me that HUA was one syllable. I asked him how he knew and he informed me that he was based there for three years. I told him that some of the IP addresses of my readers came up on the South Lawn of the White House, but I assumed that was just a generic point on the Google map for Washington. He immediately informed me that the South Lawn was where Marine One, the President's helicopter landed. Again I asked him about how he knew that and he claimed to work with the chopper at the White House for four years! As for Fort Huachuca, they visit here so often that I have an article up about them on this site entitled Fort Huachuca, Spies, MARS, and a Little Martian Humor. Joe is mentioned on the Fort Huachuca article just cited, but the transliteration of his last name on that article is not as good as that on Figure 4 (which is the second best spelling) or Figure 5 (which is the best spelling).

       The conversation (or interview, if that was what it was) was not all entirely friendly. At one point I told him about how I was challenging NASA, and that I had published the names of scientists from the U.S., Netherlands, Canada, Belgium, (West) Germany, Taiwan, Italy, Japan, Switzerland, Scotland, France, Sweden as well as from the Soviet Union and its Warsaw Pact ally Poland who had met in Tokyo and Osaka, Japan at the Third International Conference of Nondestructive Testing in March, 1960. I have seen evidence (presented and discussed elsewhere on this site) that this group was apparently trying to figure out how to counter the technology that was recovered at the Roswell Incident. It was at this point that Joe told me he had heard about someone like me who had his computer impounded by the Government who then loaded child pornography on it. They then prosecuted him for the porno. Joe said the man never owned a computer again.

       My response wasn't friendly. Joe said he was a Catholic. I told him about what I did to the Catholic Church after they baptized my older son against his will, and against mine. I forced them to change their doctrine and annul the baptism. Think I'm kidding? The annulment letter from Archbishop McCarthy of Miami is at http://arkcode.com/images/annument_letter.png and the press coverage in the Miami Herald is at http://arkcode.com/photo4_85.html. The press made it sound like they did me a favor. Actually, they gave me what I wanted because I was suing them for six million dollars, and they knew I would win. See the Release from Liability.  Note: the boy in question went on to earn an MIT geophysics degree, but despite initial orders to Space Command, he entered the Air Force as an Orthodox rabbi in the chaplain corps. My point in bringing up the custody battle was that I'm a bad guy to piss off and I don't back off from a fight. That was the low point in the discussion, but it improved a lot from there - perhaps when we discussed the potential misuse of nanotechnology and/or AI. We spoke about people who claim that AI is a threat to human survival. Examples:

(1) ELON MUSK. In October, 2014, at MIT the SpaceX owner said, “I think we should be very careful about artificial intelligence. If I had to guess at what our biggest existential threat is, it’s probably that. He went on to say “With artificial intelligence we are summoning the demon. In all those stories where there’s the guy with the pentagram and the holy water, it’s like – yeah, he’s sure he can control the demon. Doesn’t work out.”

(2) STEPHEN HAWKING. The professor said, "The primitive forms of artificial intelligence we already have, have proved very useful, but I think the development of full artificial intelligence could spell the end of the human race. Once humans develop artificial intelligence it would take off on its own and design itself on an ever increasing rate. "Humans, who are limited by slow biological evolution, couldn't compete and would be superseded."

(3) BILL GATES. "Humans should be worried about the threat posed by artificial Intelligence," Bill Gates has said. The Microsoft founder said he didn't understand people who were not troubled by the possibility that AI could grow too strong for people to control.

        It's also possible that the conversation took a friendlier turn when I emphasized that David (at the time) would like to work for DoD, and be willing to sign a nondisclosure letter. Of course he is, like me, already fully aware of what's going on behind the scenes, but he isn't as combative in nature as I am. Originally I wrote that for David to sign such a letter he would either have to have a commission or a high paying DoD job, however he seems to like his new job a lot so if he's going to work for Uncle Sam it will probably only come to pass if the company that David is working for is awarded a contract to conduct related research. The company has at least some of the equipment and many of the people needed to accomplish the task, but there would need to be a way to work around some foreign nationals that are employed there. While David was required to file a form with the Department of Homeland Security, there was no requirement for a security clearance that would be mandated for any Government-sponsored research with time. I won't name the company here, but the same minute that David walked out of work on his first day on the job, David called me. At that exact moment Level 3 came up on his web site. (Note that as I added this last sentence on 11/6/2017 I also found it necessary to add three entries for 11/6/2017 at 1:41 p.m. to Table 1 in this article). Later I discovered information that was too sensitive to discuss in an open forum here, so let's go back to the issue of a signal moving back in time.

       When my encounter with Joe ended I asked him to contact me if he had any questions. At first he said he wouldn't, but then he changed his mind and said he might. As I drove away I noticed that his car had Maryland plates. He did not, while in my view, leave the area in the space next to the right of his car. He certainly didn't make any attempt that I could see to enter the library. Based on that my son and I have had discussions about the relative difficulty of moving a signal back in time vs. opening a wormhole large enough for a person. On this issue, physics aside, I would point out that the axis term on Figures 4, 5 and 6 is SIGNAL FROM FUTURE (not PERSON from future).

        Here I want to make a few things clear about what happened long after I checked out Slant by Greg Bear. On June 30, 2017 I went back to the library to check on records pertaining to when I read it and what its overall circulation looked like. Initially I only remembered the gray cover, but I quickly found it in the science fiction section. Oddly, the librarian told me that the book hadn't been checked out since March, 2016 - 5 months before I read it. And it had only been checked out 8 times since they bought it in 2009. Could I have been wrong about when I read it? No. After my encounter with Joe I remember considering taking my son's car into the shop for an oil change with the real intention of looking under it to see if a tracking device had been attached that allowed Joe to follow me to the library. However I didn't go for the change because I believed that if I was being tracked it would more likely have been via my cell phone. However, when I went back to the library on June 30, 2017, it was in search of a more out-of-the-box solution to the question of how Joe knew when and where to find me and, perhaps, what I would be reading. At 2:57 pm on July 5, 2017. I wrote, "I will pause for a day or two - on this part of the article to give DoD some time to react to what I've written. Well, that was before I found Figure 5 which really speaks for itself. If we are not dealing with an actual time traveller, we are almost certainly dealing with a meeting set up due to a signal sent back from the future.

MAJOR UPDATE OF NOVEMBER 22, 2017: This article is already too long, but today I searched the Code for the axis term TIME POLICEMAN or TIME COP. I found it at a minimum skip of 102. I wanted to know if Joseph's last name came up in conjunction with it. While I won't show it here because it's so sensitive, the answer is yes. For my friends at DoD I will tell you how to find it. The entire matrix is contained between Exodus chapter 28 verse 18 and Exodus chapter 28 verse 38. It spans 1,025 of surface text. The matrix has 11 rows, 5 columns (55 characters) and it has Joseph's last name (best spelling) at skip +1 against odds of 1,847 to 1. What this implies is that whether Joseph is himself a time traveler, or merely a guy acting on a signal from the future, he is acting in the capacity of a law enforcement officer who is enforcing issues pertaining to time. However, as for which agency he actually works for, so far I have only seen the word for ESTABLISHMENT come up in the open text, but it requires an expansion to 460 letters to see it all. The term URIM AND THUMMIM in the open text crosses and shares a letter mem with TIME COP. The Urim and Tummin were worn by Aaron and later high priests in Judaism. They were used for divination and cleromancy. In short, their use was related to seeing the future and understanding how to interpret the Law (Torah).

       Before looking at the significance of Figure 5, first let me briefly address Figure 4.

STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF FIGURE 4 AND ASPECTS OF FIGURE 1. No statistical significance was assigned to the axis term, here the 3rd lowest ELS of WARNING FROM FUTURE. Although the final odds make this matrix seem very significant, I don't place Figure 4 in the league of Figure 5 because it requires a row split of 2 to reveal both JOSEPH and Joseph's last name.  JOSEPH had about 1 chance in 2.5 to be on the matrix, and his last name was found against odds of about 15 to 1 (Figure 5 is where the names really shine). On Figure 4 the term in the open text that crosses and shares the first letter (ayin) with WARNING FROM FUTURE is translated as SOOTHSAYER. It's actually clouds, but most Bible translations render the section as talking about soothsayers and diviners. Although this term wasn't sought a priori, when I find a term in the open text that's equivalent of the meaning of the axis term, I break from my usual protocol to seek how likely it was to be there. There was only chance in 173 to have it on the 880-letter matrix. Obviously it was far less likely to share the first letter with WARNING FROM FUTURE. Note: Figures 1A and 1B also had  SOOTHSAYER on them in the open text. SOOTHSAYER AND DIVINERS only occurs once in Torah. It's a terrific term to look for in conjunction with an article about moving signals through time. However while Level 3, Fort Huachuca and the rest of DoD may wonder if I see myself this way, I want to be clear that the answer is no. I see myself as a very hard-working scientific investigator who is seeking proof of extraordinary occurrences that would stand up in a court of law. While I censor a few things in this article like Joseph's last name and some full military IP addresses, I would certainly use them in court if necessary. The phrase SOOTHSAYER AND DIVINERS was found on Figure 1A in the open text against odds of about 263 to 1. It was found in 322 letters with LEVEL THREE and ROFFMAN against odds of about 947 to 1.

       Continuing with Figure 4, TIME and INTELLIGENCE are both at the same absolute skip as WARNING FROM FUTURE. Odds against this were about 11 to 1 for TIME and 5.76 to 1 for INTELLIGENCE. The only other phrase of great interest was YOUR SEED LIKE THE STARS OF HEAVEN. Our planet is quickly reaching its carrying capacity. There's reason to fear that when it is reached an artificial intelligence may decide that Earth is better off without us. These fears were discussed above in conjunction with warnings by Elon Musk, Stephen Hawking and Bill Gates. Perhaps Joseph wanted to warn David about the threat to ensure that one day he would program the necessary precautions to prevent such an outcome. At Yale David used AI programs to predict cancer risk. Recently he was informed that he was hired for his new job in part because of his AI skills. As for total odds against Figure 4 they were about 101,840,161 to 1, but I think it's wiser to focus on individual term significance than on total combined value.

STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF FIGURE 6.  Here the axis term is SIGNAL FROM FUTURE at its 7th lowest skip in wrapped Torah. The primary a priori word sought was JERUSALEM. I sought it and MOUNT SINAI because I wanted to know if there is a link between miracles occurring at both locations and a signal from the future. In the Hebrew text of the Tenach (what Christians call the Old Testament) JERUSALEM occurs 664 times at skip +1 with the 6-letter spelling found on the matrix, and another 5 times with the modern 7-letter spelling. I sought both spellings on the matrix. Note that in the Torah, Jerusalem is never found at skips +1 or -1. So the only other special case skips to seek are those at the absolute skip of the axis term. SIGNAL FROM FUTURE is at skip +49,842. There is only one ELS of JERUSALEM at that absolute skip in Torah. After factoring in ELS Rank 7 of SIGNAL FROM FUTURE there was only one chance in 1,814 to find JERUSALEM in a 24-letter box with the axis term - really less - one chance in 2,721 because there were only 16 letters left to find Jerusalem after the column with SIGNAL FROM FUTURE is eliminated from consideration because its 8 letters conflict with JERUSALEM. Odds against finding JERUSALEM at a special case skip somewhere on the full 442-letter matrix were about 690 to 1. This is why I was shocked to see JERUSALEM so close to SIGNAL FROM FUTURE. But the other a priori key words were also quite significant. Before factoring in the axis term ELS rank of 7, UFO was found at skip +1 againsts odds of about 58 to 1, THE TEMPLE and MOUNT SINAI were each found at skip +1 against odds of about 43.6 to 1 and one of three synonyms sought ofTHE ALIEN was found at a special case skip against odds of about 12 to 1. As for the UFO shown over Temple Mount, videos and worthwhile commentary are found at http://nationalufocenter.com/2014/01/are-the-videos-taken-over-jerusalem-real-or-fake/. In all, odds against Figure 6 occurring by chance alone were about 132,500,832 to 1. As such, the matrix again raises fundamental theological questions of the highest nature. Figure 5, found on July 6, 2017, not only greatly reinforces my concerns, but really removes all doubt that the concerns are valid.

EXPERIMENTAL EFFORT TO DETECT SIGNALS FROM THE FUTURE.

      I was just about to start a time experiment article with the opening statement that for a long time I have noticed that about two tenths of a second after I write words, they are heard on TV. While watching the PBS News Hour on April 1, 2016, as I started to write for a long time the words were then broadcast on the show. On June 9, 2015 I was curious about how often this phenomenon occurred, and I started keeping records.  Table 1 below is the record of my results between June 9, 2015 and September 5, 2016. It was then temporarily suspended, and resumed again on June 22, 2016 stopping on September 4, 2016 and resuming again on June 26, 2017. I do not record names (like Trump) that are constantly on the news. The Table below only shows words that I wrote in conjuncion with my web sites and it's likely that all or almost all of them were written while I was listening to Fox News.

       Are the results below significant? To answer this properly, I need a control group - composed of other prolific writers who record how often they experience the phenomenon. However, it should be noted that I am running at least 2 experiments to detect signals from the future. The experiment below so far (largely) only seems to detect random words which are likely coincidental. Much better is the 20-year old Torah Code Experiment as exemplified by Figures 1B and 5 in this article. Here I often find what appear to be coherent messages. An outstanding example was posted on November 7, 2017 - the Church massacre by Devin Kelley.  Added to these two experiments is an analysis of the reactions of major readers like DoD, NASA, the European Space Agency,  the United Kingdom Ministry of Defense as well as Kremlin and Chinese Government sites. There was a real spike when I first mentioned the Casimir Effect. That may be due to curiosity on their part, or it might indicate that I have touched a nerve. Again, to my U.S. Government friends, if I have touched nerves then I strongly advise you to invite me back into the Team. As for my son, David, he is happy with his current job and has no desire to move to the frozen wastes of the north at a place like Brookhaven National Lab, but he is willing to work from Florida and commute to national labs or DoD sites as necessary.

     The question here is are the words recorded above due to chance alone, to a real phenomenon that needs to be understood, or a deliberate effort to communicate with me? If the last possibility turns out to be operative, then in an effort to let some future experimenter know when to try to reach me, I decided to check to see what time of day is most productive. As Is shown on Figure 7 above and on Table 2 below, this turns out to be between 2:00 p.m. and 2:59 pm. Here it is important to understand something about my typical daily schedule. In general, except for Sabbaths and high Jewish holidays when work (writing in this case) is prohibited, I wake up by 9:00 a.m., check my e-mail and site readership over night, record any significant readers from space agencies, note but generally don't record DoD readers, and then begin writing or Torah Codes research. This goes on until before noon when I perform required morning prayers. Often in the early afternoon I swim about a half mile, then return to work/writing. Other than shopping, or dinner, I usually write until about midnight. Starting in October, 2017 when my son returned from Yale, I typically devote much of Sunday to family activities. Not every term heard in TV after I wrote it gets recorded. Sometimes I'm too busy at the moment they're heard and I forget to record them later. I would estimate that this has occurred about a hundred times between June 2015 and November 2017.

TIME FOR A GEDANKEN-EXPERIMENT? Maybe. Here are some parameters in reference to Table 1:

1. The distance between my TV and my work station (i.e., my dining room table) is 21 feet.

2. Let's say that somehow I am really sensing words broadcast 0.2 seconds before I hear them, although I still lack a control group that allows me to judge if there is anything special about what I notice. For purposes of this thought experiment let's assume that I sensed something from 0.2 seconds in the future because I was temporarily transported and moved at a high rate of speed, or perhaps simply vibrated at a high rate of speed.

3. Now, I want to be clear. Although I have met several people like my friend Commander/Dr. C. B Scott Jones like who claim to have been abducted by aliens, I don't endorse any of their memories. I merely note that people have made such claims.

4. I have no memory of an alien abduction nor do I have any physical symptoms to make me believe that I was so vibrated. I am, here, simply conducting a gedanken-experiment to ask what kind of speeds would be necessary to build up a time difference of 0.2 seconds over a distance of 21 feet.

5. The starting formula that I will work with is:

Δt = Δt'_{/(1 – v}²_/c²₎ ^½

^{We want to solve for v so for starters:}

Δt(1 – v²/c²) ^½ = Δt'

(1 – v²/c²) ^½ = Δt'/Δt

Equating the speed of light to 1, and taking V in terms of C, 1² = 1, so

(1 – v²) ^½ = Δt'/Δt

Squaring both sides

1 – v² = (Δt'/Δt)²

v² =  1 – (Δt'/Δt)²

Taking the square root of both sides

v = [1 – (Δt'/Δt)²]^1/2

^{Before moving on, how long should it take for light to travel 21 feet? The speed of light (c) is 983,571,056 feet per second.}

^{d = vt}

^{21 feet = (983,571,056 feet per second)*time in seconds}

^{t = d/v}

^{time in seconds = (21 feet/983,571,056 feet /second)}

^{thus time in seconds = 0.000000021350770614787184221 seconds}

     Now if there is nothing relativistic going on, it should take each of the mouthed words on Table 1 approximately 2.135 X 10-⁸ seconds to reach my work station. I say mouthed because the sound, of course, will take longer. If we take a human voice at 165 Hz it will take 0.0188093 seconds to travel the 21 feet.

So, the sequence of events being investigated here is as follows:'

(1) The word comes into my mind and is typed or in the process of being typed.

(2) About 0.2 seconds later (+/- 0.1 seconds) I see the word spoken on TV if I am watching TV (Fox News). This is 2.135 X 10-⁸ seconds after the image formed on the screen.

(3) About 0.0188093 seconds later the sound of the word is heard by me.   

     It should be understood that different television sets take noticeably different times to produce the same image and sound. For example, in my living room I have a 34 inch Wide Screen Magnavision TV.  In my rear bedroom there is an old 20 inch (Cathode ray tube) Panasonic TV. We hear a clear echo effect when we are positioned halfway between the two TV's. The Magnavox is on wireless while the Panasonic has a cable connection. The delay in signal reception is somewhat like what happens when I start to write a word or words and then hear it or them on TV. However, my head is not a TV receiver (although, when I was young and in the Navy serving on the aircraft carrier KITTY HAWK in 1970, I was able to hear the SPS-10 surface search radar whenever it swept by my head - with definite noise like zzzzzzz playing on the metal filings in my mouth). My son, David, cannot hear radar, but curiously he can hear frequencies that I and most people can't. He now lives in Satellite Beach, Florida not far from Patrick Air Force Base. But a few miles south there are two condominiums just north of Pelican Beach Park that have high frequency devices meant to keep pigeons off the balconies and roofs. Every time we walked up the beach there he complained about pain in his ear, but I heard nothing. So I visited the office there to see if they could explain the noise. They immediately had the answer and informed me that just one of their tenants could hear the sound too. It might be that like the radar I am sensitive to certain TV signals. That would be very unusual, but much less strange than receiving signals from the future.  A thorough study would have to rule out this possibility.

On producing an advance in time of 0.2 seconds. Earlier we showed that a traveller moving through space at 20% of the speed of light for 1 year would come back to Earth about 7.5 days into the future. Let's first look at the math for it, then do some substitution, and figure out what speed would be required to produce a 0.2 second time advance over over a much shorter time that would fit in with watching a TV while writing an article. Let's say the incident occurred during 5 minutes in which my wife didn't notice me gone because she was in the shower.

       At 20% of light speed here are the numbers for someone who experiences and ages 1 year in space:

t = t^’_{/(1 – v}²_/c²₎ ^½

t = _{1 yr/(1 – 0.2}²_/1²₎ ^½

t = 1 yr/(1 – 0.2²_/1²₎ ^½

t = 1 yr/(1 – 0.04/1) ^½

t = 1 yr/(1 – 0.04) ^½

t = 1 yr/(0.96) ^½

t = 1 yr/0.97979589711327

t = 1.0206207261 years

Moving, as noted earlier, at 20% of speed of light a particle that ages 1 year would see 1.0206207261 years (about an extra 7.5 days) go by back on Earth. At 80% of light speed the 7.5 days grows to 8 months.

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

For a space traveller to see 300 seconds pass on a spaceship and 300.2 seconds pass on back on Earth, what velocity is required?

 300.2 seconds= 300 seconds/(1 – v2/c2) ½  

(1 – v²/c²) ½ = 300 seconds/300.2 seconds

(1 – v²/c²) ½ = 0.99933377748167888

1 – v²/c² = 0.9986679988158

Using 1 for C

1 – v² = 0.9986679988158

1 – 0.9986679988158 = v²

0.0013320011842 = v²

0.036496591052 = v

       That's over 3.6% of the speed of light! This is too fast for an object to remain in orbit. It strains credibility to think that I could have been abducted, accelerated to relativistic velocities, and then returned to my work station with nothing more notreworthy than occassionally typing words that would soon be spoken on TV, so I'm not going to buy or try to sell this as an explanaton for what's happened. But before you blow off the idea of UFO abductions and teleportation, please allow me to point to some evidence backing these concepts. They are found in my article entitled UFO Teleport Beam - And An Air Force Report.

       The surprisingly unclassified report written by Eric W. Davis of Warp Drive Metrics entitled TELEPORTATION PHYSICS STUDY is dated August 2004. It was approved for public release by the Air Force Materiel Command at Edwards Air Force Base. The Report (unless it is part of a deliberate disinformation campaign) offers significant evidence that aliens have in fact visited our planet. The report was pulled from the Internet after it attracted a lot of attention, however before it was taken down I copied it. A print screen of the critical page 56 states published on my other article states, "There are also a small number of credible reports of individuals who reported being teleported to/fromUFOs during a UFO close encounter which were scientifically investigated (Vallee, 1988, 1990, 1997)."

       While the hard thing for me to accept is that anyone could abduct me and then repress my memory, I'm not sure that the energy required to accelerate to such high velocity is more than that required to teleport anyone.

SUGGESTION FOR DAVID RELATIVE TO THE SIZE OF TEMPORAL FIELD. As I updated this article on November 2, 2017 it occurred to me that if temporal fields exist in conjunction with accelerators, they are likely very tiny. But how tiny? My gut feeling is that we should look at the Casimir Effect. Wikipedia states that in quantum field theory, the Casimir effect and the Casimir–Polder force are physical forces arising from a quantized field.

 

      The typical example is of the two uncharged conductive plates in a vacuum, placed a few nanometers apart. Because the strength of the force falls off rapidly with distance, it is measurable only when the distance between the objects is extremely small. On a submicron scale, this force becomes so strong that it becomes the dominant force between uncharged conductors. In fact, at separations of 10 nm – about 100 times the typical size of an atom – the Casimir effect produces the equivalent of about 1 atmosphere of pressure (the precise value depending on surface geometry and other factors).^[6]

QUESTIONS:

(1) What are the size of the plates and                      

(2) How does that size compare with the electromganetic spectrum?      

The answer to question (1) is that each is a square with sides measuring 1 mm: From physicsworld.com, July 18, 2012:

Physicists solve Casimir conundrum. While Casimir originally formulated his theory for parallel plates, actually measuring the force in this way is tricky because it is very difficult to align the plates well enough to perform the experiment. Lamoreaux's breakthrough in 1997 involved measuring the force between a metal plate and a metal sphere – an arrangement that does not require precise alignment. His latest experiment involves measuring the force between a gold-covered sphere of radius 4 mm and an extremely thin membrane of silicon nitride that is also coated with gold. The membrane is just a few hundred nanometres thick and the gold coating is 200 nm think. An important feature of the resulting gold surface is that it is flat to within 3 nm throughout the entire membrane, which is a square with sides measuring 1 mm.

A diagram showing the device used to measure the Casimir force. The silicon nitride (SiN) nanomembrane is shown in grey and the gold surfaces in yellow. (Courtesy: American Physical Society)

 The answer to question (2) is that 1 mm corresponds to an extremely high frequency  (300 GHz) microwave with an energy of 1.24 meV.

 

      Continuing this open discussion with my son, and with the knowledge that DoD and a foreign (friendly) Defense establishment accessed this article immediately after I first wrote about the Casimir Effect, it occurs to me that there is a question of causality that must be considered with respect to the entire time question. I see people that speculate on time travel in conjunction with the Casimir Effect like Dr. David Lewis Anderson who runs time studies at the Anderson Institute. A quick search on line indicates that Anderson is not (at least now) discussed on Wikipedia, and there is an article that claims the Government had an article there pulled down.  Normally, if they think the guy is a nut, they would at least post a criticism of him. So I asked my son, Dr. David Roffman to look at Anderson's math to see if he agreed or could spot immediate red flags, and he did so on November 5, 2017.  Sadly, here is what he sent me:

EVALUATION OF CASIMIR-RELATED CLAIMS MADE BY THE ANDERSON INSTITUTE

Anderson's website provides numerous well known derivations for physical situations that occur with Casimir Effect.  The material is at most at the level of a 1st year graduate course in quantum mechanics or electrodynamics.  His claims of time travel are unsubstantiated as he quickly discusses this after a textbook derivation with no evidence to back up his claims.  It appears that he just does "textbook style derivations" and then makes claims with no way to connect the two.

        This still leaves us with the question of why L-3, DoD and other intruiging players are so interested in David Roffman? It could be that they know he will make a breakthrough. Thus they sent Joseph to confront me at the library in 2016 as described above, and they managed to get Brookhaven on the reverse end of my IP address and bug everything we write in a way that is very easy to follow (and document). But we now know they are "here" almost continually or truly continually. So, in a sense, they may be (perhaps along with me) forcing my son to focus on the topic, though it would help a lot if they simply directed the company that hired him to give him problems that line him up the right way to make the discovery. However, if someone in the future has the technology to send something through time then why take a chance to mess things up by getting our attention as they have? If they did not take the action that we have seen, would it make any difference? Would someone else give them what they want?

       I see that my son wrote about the Casimir Effect when he was just 16. For the record, I will include his article here.

Notes by David A Roffman on Chapter 12 of FRONTIERS IN PROPULSION SCIENCE

Chapter by G. Jordan Maclay (Proffesor Emeritus, University of Illinois),

Quantum Fields LLC, Richland Center, Wisconsin

     Chapter 12 explores how quantum vacuum properties may be applied to propulsion.  Quantum electrodynamics (QED) is a theory of how light and matter interact (the photon is the force exchange particle for electromagnetism).  It has been verified to 1 to 10 billion.  QED predicts that the quantum vacuum (the lowest state of the electromagnetic field) holds a fluctuating virtual photon field.  Although vacuum is everywhere, currently very little force can be derived from it.

    Most efforts in this area revolve around Casimir forces, which arise due to quantum fluctuations.  These forces have recently been used in microelectromechanical systems.  The chapter will consider spacecraft that use the vacuum for hypothetical possibilities, not engineering feasibilities.  To have effective propulsion, breakthroughs in material, methods, and understanding will be necessary.  There are no simple ways to mathematically understand how to achieve success. 

    The field of quantum mechanics is the key to understanding Casimir forces.  This area states that the lowest state is that of the quantum vacuum.  Particles and light are both quantized fields that are fully relativistic.  Any number of photons can exist, and can be easily transformed into coordinate systems (called Lorentz transformations).  In the vacuum, pairs of particles (photons, electron-positron pairs, etc.) appear and disappear instantaneously (virtual pairs).  Fluctuating electromagnetic fields, which composed the vacuum, are quantized.  The vacuum is similar to Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle, where momentum and position continually oscillate in certainty.  Note: Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle ΔP*Δx ≥ h/2 where ΔP is the uncertainty in the momentum and Δx is the uncertainty of the position.  In the lowest state, the oscillator is still vibrating, with an energy ½ hω.  The Δx and ΔP are actually standard deviations.

     A zero-point electromagnetic field is an isotropic fluctuating electromagnetic field that occurs in a particle field, and is present everywhere at zero K with all electromagnetic sources removed.  Fluctuations affect all things in the universe.  This energy comes from virtual photons of energy.  For the quantum vacuum, frequencies that correspond to less than 10^-34 m (Planck length) are ignored.  Energy is predicted to exist in the 10¹¹⁴ J/m³ range.  However, real results have shown it to be hundreds of orders of magnitude less.  This is the greatest discrepancy in scientific history.  Some solutions to this cosmological constant problem have been renormalization, super-symmetry, string theory, and quintessence.  In this system, real photons have less energy than virtual photons.

     Casimir forces were predicted by Heindrick Casimir in 1948.  An important note is that modes with frequencies greater than the plasma frequency aren’t really affected by metal surfaces due to transparency of metal at those levels.  To not have infinite quantities, the finite change in energy of the vacuum due to surfaces must be computed.  These forces can act differently for differently shaped formations.  For a cube or sphere, Casimir forces jut outward.  However, for a rectangular cavity, the forces may be outward, inward, or zero.  For application to space travel, it is hoped that by transferring energy (arising from radiation pressure) from virtual photons to surfaces, net propulsion can be generated.

     The dynamic Casimir effect has parallel plates that should move rapidly, and that can cause an excited state of the vacuum between the plates (this causes the creation of real photons).  Unfortunately, this has yet to be observed through experimentation.  A vibrating mirror could be used here for space propulsion.

    Even though the Casimir effect is well known, there are still alternative explanations.  The observed effects could just be derivatives of Van der Waals forces.  They could also be interpreted in terms of source fields.

    Despite all of our knowledge, this field, like many others, has limitations on what can be calculated.  Parallel plate geometry (almost sphere-flat plate geometry) has been the only for which results have been calculated.  Other surfaces are too difficult to calculate.  Right angles provide a real source of trouble.  Properties of binding energies are typically ignored.

    The force wasn’t accurately measured until 1998.  Typically measurements are made by having one surface flat, and the other curved.  Recent work has confirmed effects and predictions for finite conductivity, surface roughness, temperature, and uncertainty in dielectric functions.

    Parallel plate Casimir forces result in an inverse fourth power relationship as the plates change in distance for conducting surfaces.  The sticking of micromachined membranes to each other may be caused by these forces.  However, for semiconductor surfaces, the equation for force is more complicated.  For this situation, it is possible to tune plasma frequency by light, temperature, or voltage.  Arnold et al. were able to see an increase in Casimir forces due to light.  This has yet to be repeated though. 

    As for space propulsion, it is possible, but is not efficient.  An important fact in this area is that if vacuum energy is independent of craft position, then energy and momentum are constant.  The space ship mentioned in the book is that of quantum sails.  One would think symmetry of radiation pressure must be broken.  Equal virtual photon impacts on both sides of a sail will produce no net force.  Different materials on each side of the sail will make no difference.  Temperature gradients may, however, may cause a force to be exerted.  Invariance of zero-point fluctuations is a precept of the quantum vacuum.  If this didn’t exist, then it would be possible to find a universal rest frame for the universe.  But if that were true, then special relativity would be false.  While it would seem that thermal effects could generate propulsion, causality may throw this pleasant result out.  The real question is how to remove energy from the vacuum.

    There have been ideas about using negative vacuum energy density to assist in propulsion.  This would make negative mass (or so it is hoped).  As discussed in earlier chapters, this has repulsive properties, and could provide endless propulsion.  However, there has been no negative vacuum energy density ever produced (it is always positive).  If success occurs, then it may also be possible to generate wormholes.  It may be possible to reduce mass through this approach.

    A dynamic system is another possibility for propulsion.  The vibrating mirror is one such approach.  A mirror is powered to generate radiation.  Such a rate of vibration starts at zero, increases, and then returns to zero.  The book considers ideal conditions, and efficiency.  All photons produced are assumed to fly off in one direction (and not all over the place).  Efficiency is still very low, with a momentum to energy ratio of about 1/c (the speed of light).  The following are ignored in this setup: mass change in the craft, radiative mass shifts, fluctuations and divergence issues, and dissipative force that made the mirror vibrate.  Based on the dynamic Casimir effect and known science, 10^-5 photons will emitted per second.

    Chapter 12 goes further by proposing a craft that relies 100% on the quantum vacuum.  The motor that would power the mirrors could be run off quantum energy.  Quantum energy could be collected via perfectly conducting (uncharged) parallel plates.  Casimir forces would do work on the plates, and with a reversible isothermal process, success could achieved (mirrors would accelerate).  A best-case result of such a rocket would peak at 8 m/s.  This is about 10³ fold less than a chemical rocket.  While propulsion is possible, an assistive power source would be a good idea to have.

    Mirrors could produce a velocity 3 x 10^-20 m/s².  This is inefficient and slow.  Not all hope is lost, as the chapter provides ideas to increase acceleration.  A typical response to this problem is to use the dynamic Casimir effect, which hasn’t been proven yet.  In 1994, it was predicted (by Law) that a resonant response of the vacuum to an oscillating mirror in a one-dimensional cavity would occur. 

     If the oscillation frequency is equal to the odd integer multiple of the fundamental optical resonance frequency, then (for the GHz range) it possible to increase acceleration of the theoretical craft by a factor 10⁹ (to 3 x 10^-11).  By raising temperature of a 1cm cavity to 290K, it is possible to provide another increase of 10³.  This means that after ten years, a velocity of 10m/s is reached (three orders of magnitude less than Voyager).

    Results are very dependent upon assumptions.  The book used plate mass/area and systems liberally.  However, for the oscillation amplitudes, conservative estimates were used.  To create large amplitudes (for oscillation) it may be necessary to use carbon-nanotubes.  Another approach is creating a large gradient of an index of refraction using a plasma front.  When the gas and the semiconductor in this approach are viewed, the acceleration of the mirror can be 10²⁰ m/s².  There will be Fourier components, and there is still much work to be done in this area.  It may also be possible to focus the fluctuations of the vacuum electromagnetic field.

    While all this may seem to be great, there is still too much unknown in physics.  We still cannot magnify Casimir forces to the macroscopic levels.  Complex geometries and facts of interest from them are still all in the dark.  There is no consensus for the general outlook and the effects of materials.  Numerous tests are needed to find closure on negative mass claims and the dynamic Casimir effect.  The only real use of Casimir forces has been in micro and nano-electromechanical systems.  There are more possibilities to be discovered here, including quantum torque. Only time will tell if success waits, but miniaturization and progress are expected.

NOTES TO DOD AT FORT HUACHUCA AND LEVEL 3 on 11/6/2017 and 11/16/2017. Good to see you all back here again. My Fort friends were on this article at 12:14:53 MST7MDT, at 16/Nov/2017:08:39:15 MST7MDT on an old version of a link to our Basic Report and, Level 3 visited David's diplomas and transcripts up at http://davidaroffman.com/photo4_42.html at 13:07:41 MST7MDT. A day without Huachuca is almost like a day without sunshine (as I update this article in 11/16/2017 I see you back again at the reverse IP of Drake Holdings LLC at 16/Nov/2017:04:32:45 MST7MDT on Sections 5 and 6 of our Basic Report). If you're not going to invite us out there think about visiting us for the upcoming Falcon Heavy launch. The dinner and beer are on me. We will have a dynamite view plus double sonic booms on landing of the first stage boosters. Like me, David and my wife would love to meet you folks. OK, I promise, if you show up, I won't write about it unless you ask me to (but you really should be using a generic DoD IP address rather than one that traces directly to Huachuca unless you are trying to deceive an enemy state).

       As for Level 3, my offer to Fred Anderson at your in Cape Canaveral remains open - I will speak to his astronomical group about the true situation on Mars. Yes, I'm being a bit sarcastic, but you've got to know that you've earned it. I don't care how much monitoring of our sites is done by the Government although if Huachuca would simply use their own IP address I would neither publish it nor make a big deal out if it. I see other DoD sites here on a regular basis and I don't write about them. I consider DoD as being like my family. Uncle Sam is my major target audience for a high percent of what I write. But while I heard a neighbor here recently said that it wasn't always clear where to draw the line between L-3 (now CACI) and the Government, and while I know that they do a lot of important work for our government, the initial view from here raised questions of whether someone at L-3/CACI is cyberstalking our family - especially whoever spent 708 days nonstop on David's site from August 2015 to July 5, 2017 (see the top half of Figure 2). That's not still our concern, but time - the partial focus of this article - is precious. If our Government wants David to do something relative to time research we would appreciate notification sooner rather than later, and we would hope that the notification will involve me as well as my son. He can focus on any problem like a laser, but sometimes (in part with the help of the Torah Code) it helps him a lot if I can suggest where the laser should be aimed.

       It is important that all U.S. players here understand that this family will not respond well to the likes of the threat discussed earlier in conjunction with Joseph at the library. Nor was it smart to hang up on me when I called Fort Huachuca. Nor is it in our best interests for me to try to reach you via this site because my attempts to reach you via this forum interest of the Chinese and other potential adversaries. There was a Chinese reverse IP that accessed this article on the day that it was posted (42.176.44.67 in Shenyang and again since then). There is also the issue of the Kremlin IP that reversed into L-3 (Figure 2) and there was also play detected here between DoD and Iranian sites. In short, as I keep saying, we need to have a civil conversation. Our belief that NASA grossly under-reported Martian air pressure was recently proven right when ESA had to raise the orbit of its ExoMars 2016 satellite. This is discussed in Section 16.1 of our Mars Report. Note that ESA stated, "The move was mandated by 'excessive density of Mars' atmosphere.” It remains to be seen whether my son will solve the time question, but again if you want him to get involved with it, while not essential, you would be well advised to let me know first.