JUDGE GINSBURG DIES. WAS SHE JEWISH OR AN IDOLATOR?

On the eve of the Jewish New Year, September 18, 2020, liberal Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg died. She was considered a superstar by the American media (even by Foxnews.com). When it came to deciding American law, although Jewish, she totally ignored Jewish law. On Figure 1 the axis term is a transliteration of GINSBURG. RUTH is at the same skip, as is JUDGE and HOMOSEXUAL. Also at the same absolute skip but opposite direction are BABY and APPOINTER. Ginsburg was not HOMOSEXUAL but she performed homosexual marriages before she voted with the Supreme Court to legalize such marriages.  The word BABY was sought with MURDERER (which is there in the open text) because Ginsburg was pro-abortion. There is also a non-special case skip of ABORTION touching HOMOSEXUAL. APPOINTER was sought to see if the man who appointed her to the court was encoded. He is. At skip -1 is CLINTON. Because Ginsburg may be one of the causes of a civil war, I looked for WAR. As part of WAR ON YOUR ENEMIES, it's there. Not shown, three rows above the top line is CIVIL at skip -1, but I didn't want to expand the matrix that much.  This matrix, Figure 1, was found against odds of about 37,334,309 to 1. Figure 2 looks at the same ELS of GINSBURG with SODOM AND GOMORRAH. They are in a 725-letter box against odds of about 84.5 to 1. The full Figure 2 (1,015 letters) with CIVIL and WAR was found against odds of about 891,291 to 1.

ANNUAL ABORTION STATISTICS SINCE GINSBURG JOINED THE SUPREME COURT IN 1993

There have been over 20 million abortions in the U.S. since Ginsburg joined the court (more than 60 million legal abortions have occurred in the United States since 1973).  

• According to the Guttmacher Institute, an estimated 862,320 abortions took place in the United States in 2017—down from 926,240 in 2014. Guttmacher's selected annual abortion estimates for the last 20+ years are listed below:
  

• 2018	2017	2014	2011	2008	2005	2002	2000	1996
  876,000	862,320	926,240	1,060,000	1,210,000	1,210,000	1,290,000	1,310,000	1,360,000

• In 2017, approximately 18% of U.S. pregnancies (excluding spontaneous miscarriages) ended in abortion.

^{WHEN IS AN UNBORN CHILD A HUMAN BABY WITH RIGHTS?}      

       ^{There are some areas where it's hard to make a correct decision based on science or statistics. This is true with respect to when a human life should be legally classified as a human such. Is it at conception, when the heart begins to beat, when the brain develops, when hearing begins, or at birth? Keep in mind that science has no ability to detect or measure a soul. Traditionally while Catholicism says the soul is present at conception, while Judaism indicates that it's instilled at birth. But based on my experience as the father of two boys, each with a different mother, I think it's there before birth. Both boys were subject to an experiment by me before they were both. The objective of the two experiments was to ensure that they would be geniuses. The older boy, born in 1977, had a Puerto Rican mother (my ex-wife). The younger boy, born in 1993, had a South Korean mother (my current wife). The older boy earned a degree in geophysics from MIT but went on to be a chaplain (Orthodox rabbi) in the Air Force Reserve. He is also an actuary. The younger both earned his B.S. in space physics at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University when he was 18, his doctorate in physics from the University of Florida at 23, and he did his post-doctorate at Yale soon after that. Both are clearly geniuses, but as the cliché goes, "Be careful of what you wish for, you just might get it." Both have personality "issues."}

     ^{I started teaching math to each fetus in the last trimester when each child could hear instructions combined with music played or sung through the uterine wall of the mothers. A simple example would be for me to say ONE (followed by a single noisy kiss) and ONE (followed by another singular kiss) ARE TWO (followed by two noisy kisses). This allowed each child to associate a number with word and the concept of addition. The older boy tested out as a genius in his first year. He made a perfect score of 800 on his SAT math test. The younger boy was speaking sentences when he was 3 months 17 days old, and although his math skills didn't show up until he was about 12 years old, he graduated from high school at the age of 16 before racing to all his higher degrees at exceptional speed.  How do I know that both boys could hear me when they were in the womb? After each loud noise (kiss) I would get back a startled reflex kick. The younger one would always start moving around in his mother's womb as soon as I came home from work. While I'm not so pleased with their adult personalites, clearly they both had distinctive personalities while waiting to be born. I would threfore classify them as in every way humans, and I would talso "rule" if I could that any Supreme Court order to permit their execution before birth is murder. In short, I view the likes of Ruth Bader Ginsburg as a mass murderer. However, in cases of rape or serious threats to the life of the mother, I believe there may be times where permission for an abortion should be granted by a court.}

^{A LOOK AT GINSBURG LEGALIZING GAY MARRIAGE.}

    ^{While it is certainly true that American Law does not have to agree with Jewish Law (Torah) the truth is that most American law does have its roots in Torah. That's why that the Speaker of the House looks up at a full face relief of Moses directly in front of her in the House of Representatives. Moses gave us the Torah. Over the thousands of years since he received the Torah, no major monotheistic faith has accepted homosexual marriage. But Ginsburg didn't even wait for the Supreme Court to take up the matter. She conducted such weddings before they were legal. When the issue arose in her court she did not recuse herself. If love is all she is concerned about, and a man loves his dog or a woman loves her horse, would she have approved? If not, why not? As a liberal Democrat Ginsburg seemed to have one main objective: Drive God out of America Law and all morality along with Him.}

     ^{What specifically does Torah teach about homosexual behavior? There are three times when the issue is directly addressed. They are as follows:}

^{וְאֶת-זָכָר, לֹא תִשְׁכַּב מִשְׁכְּבֵי אִשָּׁה — תּוֹעֵבָה הִוא
"Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind; it is detestable." (Leviticus 18:22)}

^{.וְאִישׁ אֲשֶׁר יִשְׁכַּב אֶת-זָכָר מִשְׁכְּבֵי אִשָּׁה — תּוֹעֵבָה עָשׂוּ שְׁנֵיהֶם. מוֹת יוּמָתוּ; דְּמֵיהֶם בָּם
"And if a man lie with mankind, as with womankind, both of them have committed a detestable act: They shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them." (Leviticus 20:13)}

^{Further, in the story of Sodom and Gomorrah, the population of htese cities were almost completely destroyed by God because they wanted to homosexually gang rape what turned out to be two angels that visited Lot's house. The story in Genesis 19:1-13 is as follows:}

Sodom and Gomorrah Destroyed (New International Version)

The two angels arrived at Sodom in the evening, and Lot was sitting in the gateway of the city. When he saw them, he got up to meet them and bowed down with his face to the ground. ² “My lords,” he said, “please turn aside to your servant’s house. You can wash your feet and spend the night and then go on your way early in the morning.”

“No,” they answered, “we will spend the night in the square.”

³ But he insisted so strongly that they did go with him and entered his house. He prepared a meal for them, baking bread without yeast, and they ate. ⁴ Before they had gone to bed, all the men from every part of the city of Sodom—both young and old—surrounded the house. ⁵ They called to Lot, “Where are the men who came to you tonight? Bring them out to us so that we can have sex with them.”

⁶ Lot went outside to meet them and shut the door behind him ⁷ and said, “No, my friends. Don’t do this wicked thing. ⁸ Look, I have two daughters who have never slept with a man. Let me bring them out to you, and you can do what you like with them. But don’t do anything to these men, for they have come under the protection of my roof.”

⁹ “Get out of our way,” they replied. “This fellow came here as a foreigner, and now he wants to play the judge! We’ll treat you worse than them.” They kept bringing pressure on Lot and moved forward to break down the door.

¹⁰ But the men inside reached out and pulled Lot back into the house and shut the door. ¹¹ Then they struck the men who were at the door of the house, young and old, with blindness so that they could not find the door.

¹² The two men said to Lot, “Do you have anyone else here—sons-in-law, sons or daughters, or anyone else in the city who belongs to you? Get them out of here, ¹³ because we are going to destroy this place. The outcry to the Lord against its people is so great that he has sent us to destroy it.”

        I must be clear. First - I don't regard versions of Judaism that are not Orthodox as legitimate. The Torah either is from God or it's not. My regular readers know that I'm not happy with this position because I consider myself to be a Modern Orthodox Jew.  Yet, in the course of my 23 years of Torah Code research I have a lot of questions about Who was or will be the Encoder of Torah? The working assumption is that it's God, but the Encoder seems much more likely to predict what horrible things will occur than to actively prevent them from happening. Further it is becoming increasingly obvious to be that the military has developed or will some ability to move in time or at least have signals move in time. That, along with the possibility of alien (or is that angels?) getting involved are all reasons to question the nature of the Encoder/God. At times it seems like I'm dealing with a future-based AI (Artifical Intelligence), but there is no doubt in my mind that the Code is real and deliberately inserted into the Torah text.

       I have not found non-Orthodox Jews who have any willingness to consider an encoded Torah. They want Torah to be easy to understand and easier to ignore. That is obviously what Ginsburg was doing when it came to trying to understand issues of basic morality. This ignorance made it natural for her to back abortion rights and marriages between men having anal sex. In manufacturing a religion without Torah constraints she was not so much a Jew as she was a person who invented her own god. In short, that willingness made her not a practicing Jew. Rather it made her an idolater.

       Jewish Law does not actually execute anyone for homosexuality. There is no record that it ever has, but the laws about it make it clear that God sees such behavior as an abomination.

        Finally, as an Orthodox Jew it is important to me that Ginsburg be replaced by someone with religious convictions based on Biblical morality. Judge Any Barrett meets those standards. It horrified me when Senator Diane Feinstein attacked Barrett, because Feinstein said in reference to Catholicism, "The dogma lives loudly within you." Feinstein, like Ginsburg, is the kind of Jew who disgusts me. I do not believe in the central doctrine of Catholicism, that Jesus is divine and that he died for our sins. Nor am I happy about all the kids raped by priests. But the vast majority of Catholics do not rape little boys and they do accept the general laws of morality that they learned from Moses. The President will announce his decision tomorrow (September 26, 2020). I hope he picks Barrett to put the sinful Feinstein in her place.