AMBASSADOR YOVANOVITCH, HUNTER BIDEN & CRIMINALITY

       Marie Yovanovitch (appointed as our ambassador to Ukraine by President Barack Hussein Obama), admitted during the impeachment hearings that she was prepped by the Obama Administration about Hunter Biden's (improper) job in Ukraine. On the matrix below the axis term is YOVANOVITCH and H. BIDEN is at the same absolute skip. Two Obama-appointed Secretaries of State are on the matrix - KERRY at the same absolute skip as YOVANOVITCH and H. BIDEN, plus CLINTON at skip -1. PRESIDENT touches KERRY and KERRY shares a letter qof with BARACK H. Yovanovitch had to admit that in war the Javelin-tank killing missiles supplied to Ukraine by President Trump were more effective in stopping the Russian tanks than the blankets and meals ready to eat (and nothing else) which were delivered from Obama after Russia invaded Ukraine. WAR is in the open text two lines directly below YOVANOVITCH. The last term required some thought to find. I couldn't find quid pro quo, extortion or bribery (favorite Democrat fantasies about Trump). But right between YOVANOVITCH and WAR is RANSOM. Wikipedia defines ransom as the practice of holding a prisoner or item to extort money or property to secure their release. YOVANOVITCH was called by Schiff to back charges that Trump held back the missiles to force Ukraine to give him what he needs to defeat Joe Biden in next year's election. 

STATISTICAL AND POLITICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF THE MATRIX. The matrix is based on the 26th lowest ELS of YOVANOVITCH. The most significant a priori term was H. (Hunter) BIDEN (son of former Vice President Biden). Before factoring in the ELS rank of the axis term, H. (Hunter) BIDEN was found at a special case skip against odds of about 440 to 1. The second most significant a priori term is WAR. It's there against odds of about 12.7 to 1. Hillary CLINTON was Obama's Secretary of State from the start of his Administration in 2009 until February 1, 2013. She is on the matrix at a special case skip against odds of about 8.2 to 1. After losing to Trump for the presidency in 2016 her hatred of him is absolutely intense. She would do anything in her power to bring him down including pay for the Steele Dossier to falsely accuse the President of collusion with Russia. However she was not Secretary of State when Russia invaded Crimea in Ukraine. The Secretary then was John KERRY who is also on the matrix at a special case skip against odds of about 2.4 to 1. The President who obviously played a role in setting up Trump was Barack H. Obama. While the name Obama is not on the matrix, BARACK H. is here at a special case skip (-1) against odds of about 6.37 to 1, and PRESIDENT is at skip +1 against odds of about 7 to 1. RANSOM had about one chance in 3.7 to be here, but these probabilities are all to be anywhere on a 693-letter matrix and as such do not factor in how the words touch each other. Overall, after factoring in ELS rank 26 of the axis term, the matrix was found against odds of about 717,547 to 1. 

       This matrix was only based on the 26th lowest skip of YOVANOVITCH. Why did I explore it? Because I saw that H. (Hunter) BIDEN was at the same absolute skip (although opposite direction).  It's rare to have a 6 letter key word hook up with an 8 letter axis term at the same absolute skip. If I had chosen the ELS of this YOVANOVITCH transliteration at skip -18,741 (ELS rank 6) then a 5-letter transliteration of CLINTON appears at the same absolute skip in a 72-letter (8 column by 9 row) box. Other transliterations of YOVANOVITCH may well yield more information, but they all take a lot of time to explore which is why I keep asking my biggest fans at DoD to fund Project Creator Decoder.

       I want to be clear. Codes matrices like this one were (or will be) created by an incredible Intelligence. Be it God, an Artificial Intelligence designed by man/the U.S. Military, or aliens in our future, as Isaiah told us, the Encoder does not think like we do. We were told this in Isaiah 55:8 which states, "For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, says the LORD." For example, in Iowa as I write this on November 18, 2019 in the Presidential race in Iowa the current poll for the Democrats shows Pete Buttigieg (a homosexual married to another man), leading with 25% and a close three-way battle for second with Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren at 16%, and former Vice President Joe Biden and Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders each at 15%. Yet three times in Torah the Author condemns homosexuality and twice it indicates that capital punishment is His wish (which is why he destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah). In military actions today many military forces try to avoid or minimize collateral damage, yet in the story of Noah the Author destroys all of humanity except for one family. While I have often complained that it seems like our world is full of liars and incompetents, I am more than aware of hundreds of millions of really good people. But I'm also aware that good is a relative term, and what seems good to me does not seem good to many others (Democrats trying to destroy our President, Communists and radical Muslims).

       The task that the Encoder set out to accomplish is truly astounding. It not only lays out what laws of morality should look like according to the Encoder, but it also gives the early history of the Jewish people from Abraham down to Joshua. And yet, on top all this we are given a portrait of our future or possible futures. It is set down much like an artist would paint a portrait. While I use my left brain (the logical half) to do statistical analyses of what I find, it seems that the Encoder uses His metaphorical right brain (the artistic, emotional half) to string words together to give a picture of the world as He (or It) sees it. We are shown relationships, but relationships in reality can constantly change. People get married, but often divorce. They have children, but sometimes abandon them. And, it's also true that sometimes enemies become friends (although often not until they have fought a war with each other). If not all matrices give the same portrait relationships it's likely because different matrices capture different moments in time.