JAMES WEBB - TOP MATRIX OF ALL 2016 CANDIDATES

       When James Webb ran for the Senate in 2006, he said that he supported civil unions, not marriage, for gay couples, but he also did not support a constitutional amendment defining marriage as a heterosexual union in the State of Virginia. It's important to understand his opposition to same sex marriage because the moderator of the first Democratic presidential debate on October 13, 2015 was Anderson Cooper, who has admitted to being a homosexual. Cooper was rude to Webb throughout the debate, doing his best to cut him off, limit his ability to be heard, and arguing with him about debate rules. After the debate Webb was so flustered by his treatment that he dropped out and spoke about running as an Independent. He represents the best of what WAS the Democratic Party in the past before it morphed into what looks like a wing of the Communist Party. I suspect that those old Democrats who have not been so repulsed by the New Democratic Party to switch to the Republican Party are in fact Independents today. They don't have a nominating convention, so we don't hear from them much, but if Webb runs as an Independent he may do well enough to show why he has the best of all Torah Codes matrices for the 2016 election. This is shown in the Tables below Figure 1.

       When James Webb ran for the Senate in 2006, he said that he supported civil unions, not marriage, for gay couples, but he also did not support a constitutional amendment defining marriage as a heterosexual union in the State of Virginia. It's important to understand his opposition to same sex marriage because the moderator of the first Democratic presidential debate on October 13, 2015 was Anderson Cooper, who has admitted to being a homosexual. Cooper was rude to Webb throughout the debate, doing his best to cut him off, limit his ability to be heard, and arguing with him about debate rules. After the debate Webb was so flustered by his treatment that he dropped out and spoke about running as an Independent. He represents the best of what WAS the Democratic Party in the past before it morphed into what looks like a wing of the Communist Party. I suspect that those old Democrats who have not been so repulsed by the New Democratic Party to switch to the Republican Party are in fact Independents today. They don't have a nominating convention, so we don't hear from them much, but if Webb runs as an Independent he may do well enough to show why he has the best of all Torah Codes matrices for the 2016 election.

For all candidates (who actually have run or who were listed by the Press as possible candidates) from best to worst, the Torah Codes matrices (with links to them) are ranked as follows with Democrats in blue and Republicans in red:

      With respect to Figure 1, the Hebrew year 5777 can be written with 4 or 5 letters. The last letter is zayin (Z) which is just as rare in Hebrew as Z is in English. Most often when I seek this year in conjunction with a candidate’s name I can only find the short version – tav shin ayin zayin, which while understood as 5777 really only spells 777. Occasionally I find the full correct spelling – hey tav shin ayin zayin. But what is extraordinary about Webb’s matrix is that the skip of hey tav shin ayin zayin is exactly that of JAMES WEBB. Further, PRESIDENT is in the open text only 2 columns right of his name.

JAMES WEBB ON ISRAEL. As for Israel, Philip Gold writes in the Times of Israel:

“I know not what AIPAC or J Street think of Senator Webb. I know not and I care not. Webb’s foreign policy priorities are still evolving, and it’s a long way to November 2016. But his principles seem clear enough. Webb is neither a rampaging interventionist (imperial or humanitarian) nor ready to give anybody blank checks. He opposed the Iraq War and the Bush/neocon delusion. (One of his sons served in Iraq, another in Afghanistan, both as Marines.) He believes that the United States should “assert its national security interests” in the Islamic world but never again become an “occupying power.” He did not mention Israel in his speech.

Fair enough. In this decade of chaos and flux, single-issue fixations can be multi-issue disastrous. I suggest here only that any president who’s good for America will be, at the end of the day, good for Israel. Regarding the specifics of the American-Israeli relationship – again, it’s a long way to 2016. We may presume that Webb will yield neither to bullying nor to threats. My sense of the man is that he’s not easily convinced, but ready to listen. So if he does pull off the electoral upset of the century so far, or even decide to take a serious shot at it, those who speak for Israel had better be ready to make their case. Best they make it a strong one.”

JAMES WEBB ON OTHER ISSUES. I don't agree with some of them, but they are listed at http://www.ontheissues.org/Senate/James_Webb.htm. I would like to see strong support for restoring America's preeminence in space flight.