2 ROCKET EXPLOSIONS, ELON MUSK, AND POSSIBLE SABOTAGE.
One great match does not make a case, but it may hint at the cause of these accidents. Further investgation is required. Posted 11/2/2014
On October 28, 2014 Orbital Science attempted to launch an Antares rocket from Wallops Island, Virginia to the International Space Station. It blew up. Three days later Virgin Galactic launched a test flight of its SpaceShip 2 with two people onboard. It also blew up, killing one of the pilots. Two questions arose after the second explosion. Could it have been sabotage, and if it was, who most stood to benefit? There is no proof yet that it was sabotage, but Elon Musk, who owns SpaceX, probably stands to gain the most. On the two views of the matrix below, the axis term is the only ELS in Torah of ELON MUSK. In a 40-letter box with him, at the same absolute skip, is SABOTAGE. Odds against having SABOTAGE at a special case skip (+/- 1 or the absolute skip of the axis term) so close with ELON MUSK were about 635 to 1.
While the match between ELON MUSK and SABOTAGE is a spectacular one, it’s not enough to summon a grand jury to bring charges against Musk. For starters, we don’t yet know if one of SpaceX rockets will be sabotaged. As we expand the matrix to the left from 40 to 280 letters Musk start to look guiltier, but there is an entirely different interpretation of how ELON MUSK and SABOTAGE are related if we expand the matrix to the right. Moving left we pick up an ELS of ROCKET plus VIRGIN in the open text. It was a VIRGIN Galactic ROCKET that blew up on October 31. We need 280 letters to see all this.
However, moving right we pick up an ELS of ELECTRICITY and TESLA at skip +1, the best case scenario. In searching Internet for ELON MUSK and SABOTAGE several stories pop up about an attempt to sabotage the test drive of his Tesla electric car. The San Jose Mercury news states:
Musk, citing data collected from the car's computer, said the vehicle's electric battery did not run out of juice. He said data also contradicted Broder's statement that he set the cruise control at 54 mph but often drove slower and lowered the heat to save energy. Musk said the car's cruise control was never set to 54 and the average cabin temperature was 72 degrees. He did not address Broder's claim that the car's battery lost "the electrical equivalent of more than two-thirds of the fuel" in the tank when he left it parked overnight. Broder has denied Musk's charge that he "consciously set out to sabotage the test."
STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF THE MATRICES. As per my standard protocol, no statistical significance is assigned to the axis term, here ELON MUSK at its only ELS in wrapped Torah. As was stated above, odds against the close match of ELON MUSK and SABOTAGE in a 40-letter matrix were about 635 to 1. The 280-letter matrix formed by terms with a blue or tan background included VIRGIN in the open text against odds of about 136 to 1, and an ELS of ROCKET against odds of about 3.4 to 1 (ROCKET is a 3-letter word in Hebrew. For terms this short I require all letters in the word to be 3 or fewer letters apart). Odds against SABOTAGE being at a special case skip in the 280-letter matrix decrease to about 91 to 1. Total odds against this matrix are about 42,941 to 1.
What about the TESLA SABOTAGE issue? For TESLA I checked 4 transliterations since there are two letters with an S sound in Hebrew (samech and shin/sin) and two letters for the T sound (tet and tav). There was only one spelling found in Torah, and it was found just once at skip +1 (best case scenario). As such, it was found in the 324-letter orange and blue background boxes with ELON MUSK against odds of about 941 to 1. ELECTRICITY, which powers the TESLA, was found at a non-special case skip in this same area against odds of about 4.4 to 1. Total odds against this matrix were about 327,411 to 1, so it's actually more signficant than the VIRGIN ROCKET matrix.
SO WHAT SHOULD WE BELIEVE? Well, here it's wise to remember that I have not searched for all possible a-priori words. It may be that both sets of terms are appropriate in conjunction with Mr. Musk, however we only now know that the Tesla car part of the matrix is indicated by historical facts. In the event that physical evidence arises to support sabotage, then it would be wise to investigate whether someone from one of Mr. Musk's companies are involved. SpaceX could potentially gain a monopoly if all other private companies fail. The Torah Code does not provide a slam dunk conviction, but it can be used as a tool in conjunction with other traditional evidence to get at the truth of a matter.