BRADLEY MANNING SENTENCED TO 35 YEARS FOR WIKI SPYING

THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN EDWARD SNOWDEN AND BRADLEY MANNING.  On the surface it may appear that differences between Edward Snowden and Bradley Manning are not so great. Both abused security clearances and released classified material in an unauthorized, illegal manner. And yet, my article about Snowden views him a national hero. If he stays true to his cause, the Torah Code indicates he may be elected President of the United States one day due his zealous dedication to Constitutional rights. However, I have no problem with Manning rotting in prison for the next 35 years. While Snowden put his life on the line to expose wrong doing, Manning was just plain wrong in everything he did.  There is no way that he could have read hundreds of thousands of documents that he released for publication. Wikipedia states that, “The material released by Manning included videos of the 12 July 2007 Baghdad airstrike and the 2009 Granai airstrike in Afghanistan; 250,000 United States diplomatic cables; and 500,000 army reports that came to be known as the Iraq War logs and Afghan War logs.” The flippant release of such vast quantities of sensitive information could have led to the deaths of U.S. agents, allies, or could even cause new wars.

        Manning actually used his cross-dressing gender identity problems as an excuse to explain his treason. Perhaps he assumed that a nation with a President obsessed with homosexual “rights” would forgive him because it was politically expedient. If so, the best summation of the differences between Snowden and Manning may be that Snowden worked to end corruption, whereas Manning worked to corrupt and harm the greatest number of people possible.

STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF THE MATRIX. As per my usual protocol, no statistical significance was assigned to the axis term, here the only transliteration found for BRAD MANNING at its lowest skip in wrapped Torah. Odds against a form of SPY or SPIES being on the matrix were about 62 to 1. For IMPRISON there were various tenses that would work, and various English translations for the actual Hebrew word found (bound, in custody, etc.).  In the end I varied my usual protocol for Hebrew only. I sought the frequency of BOUND in English because that was the word used in the English version found on my CodeFinder softeware. As such, that word was found 25 times, and odds against it being on the matrix were about 17 to 1. Finally, the odds against a special case skip (+/- 1 or the absolute skip of the axis term) of WIKI were about 54 to 1. The matrix was thus  judged to exist against odds of about 59,695 to 1 .